U.S. bi-national and heritage community · eligible high reliability

U.S.–Venezuela community

A country-specific aggregate research profile. It does not identify dual citizens and should not be treated as a description of every person.

What this record observesForeign birth: true · reported ancestry: false · citizenship status available: true · confirmed dual citizenship: false.

Community at a glance

Observed country-of-birth population730,261Margin of error ± 14,520

Foreign-born estimate696,285Margin of error ± 13,940

Unweighted sample25,669Reliability: high

Citizenship compositionNot Us Citizen 68.2% · Naturalized Us Citizen 27.2%Status in the aggregate cohort, not loyalty or civic commitment

Ancestry-linked estimateNot availableCrosswalk remains under governance review

Leading statesFlorida, Texas, GeorgiaPresence, not demographic resemblance

Leading metrosNot availableNo research PUMA-to-metro allocation

Source period2020–2024ACS 5-year PUMS

Where this community lives

State count and share view. Location quotient and state-relative fields are available in the underlying state-profile asset.

Florida/FL

335,151 · 45.9%

Texas/TX

110,485 · 15.1%

Georgia/GA

28,087 · 3.8%

New York/NY

25,052 · 3.4%

California/CA

23,371 · 3.2%

Illinois/IL

19,876 · 2.7%

New Jersey/NJ

18,324 · 2.5%

North Carolina/NC

14,615 · 2.0%

Utah/UT

13,711 · 1.9%

Tennessee/TN

12,683 · 1.7%

Accessible state presence table
State	Estimate	Share of community	Location quotient	Reliability
Florida/FL	335,151	45.9%	6.857205	high
Texas/TX	110,485	15.1%	1.67853	high
Georgia/GA	28,087	3.8%	1.177438	high
New York/NY	25,052	3.4%	0.578757	high
California/CA	23,371	3.2%	0.272829	high
Illinois/IL	19,876	2.7%	0.718074	high
New Jersey/NJ	18,324	2.5%	0.89942	high
North Carolina/NC	14,615	2.0%	0.624668	high
Utah/UT	13,711	1.9%	1.85369	moderate
Tennessee/TN	12,683	1.7%	0.823173	moderate

Metropolitan profiles are withheld in this run because PUMS does not identify metropolitan areas and no research PUMA-to-metro allocation was authorized.

Race, ethnicity, and ancestry

Race, Hispanic or Latino origin, ancestry, country of birth, citizenship, and language remain separate concepts. These are aggregate estimates.

Race distribution

Aian Alone0.5%

Estimate 3,362 ± 1,164; unweighted sample 125.

Asian Alone0.6%

Estimate 4,158 ± 744; unweighted sample 224.

Black Alone0.7%

Estimate 5,218 ± 1,101; unweighted sample 170.

Nhpi AloneSuppressed

Unweighted sample 7; public estimate withheld.

Some Other Race Alone28.9%

Estimate 211,401 ± 8,769; unweighted sample 7200.

Two Or More Races52.5%

Estimate 383,356 ± 11,333; unweighted sample 13423.

White Alone16.8%

Estimate 122,639 ± 5,836; unweighted sample 4520.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Hispanic or Latino origin

Hispanic Or Latino96.9%

Estimate 707,837 ± 14,258; unweighted sample 24588.

Not Hispanic Or Latino3.1%

Estimate 22,424 ± 1,911; unweighted sample 1081.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Ancestry composition is not published because the available country crosswalk is pending research deterministic validation. Hispanic or Latino origin is not treated as race.

Age, households, and economic structure

Age

18 To 3427.6%

Estimate 201,649 ± 6,115; unweighted sample 6851.

35 To 4930.6%

Estimate 223,376 ± 6,373; unweighted sample 7417.

50 To 6418.9%

Estimate 138,230 ± 4,851; unweighted sample 5363.

65 And Over8.7%

Estimate 63,682 ± 2,651; unweighted sample 2843.

Under 1814.1%

Estimate 103,324 ± 4,706; unweighted sample 3195.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Sex as reported by the source

Female50.9%

Estimate 371,975 ± 8,550; unweighted sample 13480.

Male49.1%

Estimate 358,286 ± 8,085; unweighted sample 12189.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Nativity and citizenship

Born Abroad Of Us Parent4.7%

Estimate 33,976 ± 2,560; unweighted sample 1426.

Naturalized Us Citizen27.2%

Estimate 198,601 ± 6,422; unweighted sample 8361.

Not Us Citizen68.2%

Estimate 497,684 ± 12,187; unweighted sample 15882.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Period of entry

2010 To 201944.0%

Estimate 321,234 ± 9,675; unweighted sample 11010.

2020 Or Later25.5%

Estimate 185,942 ± 8,477; unweighted sample 5676.

Before 201030.5%

Estimate 223,085 ± 6,494; unweighted sample 8983.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Age at migration

18 To 3437.2%

Estimate 271,828 ± 6,983; unweighted sample 9422.

35 To 4919.2%

Estimate 140,078 ± 5,308; unweighted sample 4862.

50 And Over9.1%

Estimate 66,182 ± 3,042; unweighted sample 2529.

Under 1834.5%

Estimate 252,173 ± 7,401; unweighted sample 8856.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Language and English proficiency

English Only7.9%

Estimate 56,549 ± 2,988; unweighted sample 2212.

Not At All13.0%

Estimate 93,652 ± 4,930; unweighted sample 2812.

Not Well19.8%

Estimate 142,231 ± 5,105; unweighted sample 4608.

Very Well37.6%

Estimate 270,642 ± 7,211; unweighted sample 10233.

Well21.8%

Estimate 156,621 ± 6,157; unweighted sample 5539.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Household size

Five Or More People17.0%

Estimate 62,647 ± 2,942; unweighted sample 2190.

One Person11.6%

Estimate 42,720 ± 2,604; unweighted sample 1462.

Three Or Four People43.4%

Estimate 160,148 ± 4,393; unweighted sample 5786.

Two People28.1%

Estimate 103,534 ± 3,839; unweighted sample 4105.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Household type

Family Household79.1%

Estimate 291,979 ± 5,974; unweighted sample 10889.

Nonfamily Household20.9%

Estimate 77,070 ± 3,072; unweighted sample 2654.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Multigenerational household

Multigenerational8.8%

Estimate 32,523 ± 2,100; unweighted sample 1195.

Not Multigenerational91.2%

Estimate 336,526 ± 6,504; unweighted sample 12348.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Households with children

Children Present40.2%

Estimate 148,428 ± 4,098; unweighted sample 5115.

No Children Present59.8%

Estimate 220,621 ± 5,617; unweighted sample 8428.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Education

Bachelors33.4%

Estimate 187,490 ± 5,049; unweighted sample 6692.

Graduate Or Professional18.3%

Estimate 102,690 ± 3,660; unweighted sample 4152.

High School Or Equivalent18.0%

Estimate 101,111 ± 4,626; unweighted sample 3308.

Less Than High School8.1%

Estimate 45,524 ± 2,668; unweighted sample 1625.

Some College Or Associate22.1%

Estimate 124,134 ± 3,970; unweighted sample 4447.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Employment

Armed Forces0.2%

Estimate 993 ± 345; unweighted sample 44.

Employed71.2%

Estimate 456,885 ± 10,270; unweighted sample 15868.

Not In Labor Force24.4%

Estimate 156,885 ± 5,172; unweighted sample 6141.

Unemployed4.2%

Estimate 26,906 ± 1,964; unweighted sample 941.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Occupation

Management Business Science Arts34.4%

Estimate 181,147 ± 4,983; unweighted sample 7272.

Military SpecificSuppressed

Unweighted sample 20; public estimate withheld.

Natural Resources Construction Maintenance10.1%

Estimate 53,028 ± 2,798; unweighted sample 1657.

Production Transportation Material Moving16.8%

Estimate 88,733 ± 4,350; unweighted sample 2761.

Sales And Office20.4%

Estimate 107,617 ± 4,373; unweighted sample 3816.

Service18.2%

Estimate 95,946 ± 3,720; unweighted sample 3191.

Other Or Suppressed0.1%

Estimate 513 ± Not enough reliable data; unweighted sample 20.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Industry

Agriculture Forestry Fishing Mining0.5%

Estimate 2,349 ± 573; unweighted sample 83.

Arts Entertainment Hospitality11.6%

Estimate 60,222 ± 3,318; unweighted sample 2040.

Construction9.2%

Estimate 47,465 ± 2,687; unweighted sample 1528.

Education Health Social Services14.5%

Estimate 74,956 ± 2,904; unweighted sample 3012.

Finance Insurance Real Estate6.5%

Estimate 33,819 ± 2,139; unweighted sample 1289.

Information1.8%

Estimate 9,438 ± 1,176; unweighted sample 355.

Manufacturing8.9%

Estimate 46,347 ± 2,850; unweighted sample 1635.

Military0.2%

Estimate 1,023 ± 342; unweighted sample 46.

Other Services5.6%

Estimate 29,212 ± 2,140; unweighted sample 1014.

Professional Administrative14.7%

Estimate 76,382 ± 3,262; unweighted sample 2814.

Public Administration1.5%

Estimate 7,728 ± 1,010; unweighted sample 334.

Retail Trade11.0%

Estimate 57,239 ± 2,765; unweighted sample 1953.

Transportation Utilities10.5%

Estimate 54,537 ± 3,223; unweighted sample 1685.

Wholesale Trade3.4%

Estimate 17,439 ± 1,774; unweighted sample 639.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Personal income

100000 Or More9.5%

Estimate 61,591 ± 2,629; unweighted sample 2511.

1 To 2499926.5%

Estimate 172,227 ± 5,494; unweighted sample 6243.

25000 To 4999927.5%

Estimate 178,575 ± 6,084; unweighted sample 5830.

50000 To 9999918.0%

Estimate 116,749 ± 4,401; unweighted sample 4264.

Zero Or Negative18.5%

Estimate 120,092 ± 4,769; unweighted sample 4385.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Poverty

100 To 199 Percent20.7%

Estimate 149,869 ± 7,046; unweighted sample 4844.

200 To 399 Percent34.4%

Estimate 249,080 ± 8,712; unweighted sample 8420.

400 Percent Or More29.3%

Estimate 212,124 ± 7,854; unweighted sample 8396.

Below 100 Percent15.6%

Estimate 112,901 ± 6,756; unweighted sample 3609.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Health insurance

Covered81.4%

Estimate 594,670 ± 12,514; unweighted sample 21447.

Not Covered18.6%

Estimate 135,591 ± 6,128; unweighted sample 4222.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Disability

With Disability5.9%

Estimate 42,873 ± 2,373; unweighted sample 1758.

Without Disability94.1%

Estimate 687,388 ± 13,948; unweighted sample 23911.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Housing tenure

Occupied Without Cash Rent1.2%

Estimate 4,415 ± 642; unweighted sample 181.

Owned Free And Clear13.3%

Estimate 49,032 ± 1,976; unweighted sample 2284.

Owned With Mortgage30.4%

Estimate 112,029 ± 4,219; unweighted sample 4718.

Rented55.2%

Estimate 203,573 ± 5,143; unweighted sample 6360.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Housing-cost burden

30 To 49 Percent29.2%

Estimate 57,783 ± 2,880; unweighted sample 1806.

50 Percent Or More28.6%

Estimate 56,507 ± 2,997; unweighted sample 1746.

Under 30 Percent42.2%

Estimate 83,595 ± 3,306; unweighted sample 2663.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Residential tenure length

Established Residence15.9%

Estimate 58,532 ± 2,503; unweighted sample 2737.

Mid Term Residence43.1%

Estimate 159,128 ± 4,744; unweighted sample 5882.

Recent Move41.0%

Estimate 151,389 ± 4,879; unweighted sample 4924.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Residential mobility

Arrived From Outside Us7.9%

Estimate 57,733 ± 4,439; unweighted sample 1926.

Different House In Us17.1%

Estimate 125,063 ± 5,859; unweighted sample 4089.

Same House74.9%

Estimate 546,651 ± 12,997; unweighted sample 19633.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

How this community differs across states

Highest community presence

Florida/FL — 335,151
Texas/TX — 110,485
Georgia/GA — 28,087
New York/NY — 25,052
California/CA — 23,371
Illinois/IL — 19,876
New Jersey/NJ — 18,324
North Carolina/NC — 14,615
Utah/UT — 13,711
Tennessee/TN — 12,683

Highest location quotient

Florida/FL — 6.86
Utah/UT — 1.85
Texas/TX — 1.68
Georgia/GA — 1.18
District of Columbia/DC — 1.03
New Jersey/NJ — 0.90
Colorado/CO — 0.88
Rhode Island/RI — 0.86
Tennessee/TN — 0.82
Indiana/IN — 0.73

Closest surrounding demographic contexts

Texas/TX — 84.1%
California/CA — 82.9%
Montana/MT — 82.7%
New Mexico/NM — 82.5%
North Dakota/ND — 82.1%
Florida/FL — 81.5%
Nevada/NV — 81.4%
Vermont/VT — 81.4%
Arizona/AZ — 81.1%
New Jersey/NJ — 80.6%

Highest presence and closest surrounding context answer different questions and are never substituted for one another.

How this community compares with the United States

State-context comparisons use the same source period and composition schema. National community averages should not be treated as characteristics of any person.

The U.S.–Venezuela community contains materially different racial, ethnic, generational, linguistic, geographic, household, and socioeconomic profiles. National averages should not be treated as characteristics of every person.

Closest demographic peers

Peer rankings use population and settlement, migration, race and ethnicity, age and household, education and economic structure, language, and housing as separately disclosed dimensions.

Closest demographic peer 1

U.S.–Colombia community

90.6% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 90.6% · without: 89.7% · rank change: 1.

Strongest similarities: Age and household, Education, work, and income, Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable)

Largest differences: Migration, nativity, and generation, Population and settlement, Housing and mobility

View dimension scores

Age and household: 95.3%
Education, work, and income: 94.3%
Housing and mobility: 91.9%
Language: 94.0%
Migration, nativity, and generation: 83.9%
Population and settlement: 86.5%
Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable): 94.3%
Population scale: 95.0%
Settlement concentration: 92.8%
State footprint: 71.8%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Closest demographic peer 2

U.S.–Nicaragua community

89.4% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 89.4% · without: 88.4% · rank change: 1.

Strongest similarities: Age and household, Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable), Language

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Migration, nativity, and generation, Education, work, and income

View dimension scores

Age and household: 96.1%
Education, work, and income: 89.7%
Housing and mobility: 91.9%
Language: 93.1%
Migration, nativity, and generation: 85.3%
Population and settlement: 84.1%
Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable): 93.2%
Population scale: 88.3%
Settlement concentration: 97.5%
State footprint: 66.6%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Closest demographic peer 3

U.S.–Peru community

88.5% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 88.5% · without: 86.3% · rank change: 2.

Strongest similarities: Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable), Age and household, Education, work, and income

Largest differences: Migration, nativity, and generation, Population and settlement, Housing and mobility

View dimension scores

Age and household: 95.9%
Education, work, and income: 93.4%
Housing and mobility: 88.2%
Language: 90.7%
Migration, nativity, and generation: 79.3%
Population and settlement: 80.6%
Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable): 97.4%
Population scale: 94.9%
Settlement concentration: 88.1%
State footprint: 58.8%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Largest measured differences

The comparison asset reports the lowest demographic structural similarities without describing communities as enemies, opposites, incompatible groups, or unlikely allies.

U.S.–Iceland community — 50.8% measured structural similarity
U.S.–Montenegro community — 53.2% measured structural similarity
U.S.–Greece community — 61.2% measured structural similarity

Explore peers in Ally Finder

Data quality

Profile state: eligible_high_reliability
Reliable dimensions: 23
Observed basis: Country of birth in the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year PUMS

Suppressed cells remain labeled. Missing values and shared zeroes do not create similarity.

What should not be inferred

Aggregate demographic similarity does not establish agreement, alliance, representation, consent, endorsement, political behavior, nationality, dual citizenship, religion, caste, tribe, sect, or individual identity.

How the comparison was calculated

Dimension-specific categorical distributions use square-root Jensen–Shannon distance; ordered distributions use bounded Wasserstein distance; population totals use log-scaled distance; and state footprints use Jensen–Shannon distance. Available reliable dimensions are combined with versioned weights. KNN is a retrieval method, not a public claim about alliance.

Weights · Sources · Data quality