WS MUSINGSWORLD SYSTEMS MUSINGS · INTERSECTIONALITY FINDER

U.S. bi-national and heritage community · eligible high reliability

U.S.–Iceland community

A country-specific aggregate research profile. It does not identify dual citizens and should not be treated as a description of every person.

What this record observesForeign birth: true · reported ancestry: false · citizenship status available: true · confirmed dual citizenship: false.

Community at a glance

Observed country-of-birth population11,294Margin of error ± 1,297
Foreign-born estimate5,772Margin of error ± 850
Unweighted sample532Reliability: high
Citizenship compositionBorn Abroad Of Us Parent 48.9% · Naturalized Us Citizen 27.9%Status in the aggregate cohort, not loyalty or civic commitment
Ancestry-linked estimateNot availableCrosswalk remains under governance review
Leading statesFlorida, California, VirginiaPresence, not demographic resemblance
Leading metrosNot availableNo research PUMA-to-metro allocation
Source period2020–2024ACS 5-year PUMS

Where this community lives

State count and share view. Location quotient and state-relative fields are available in the underlying state-profile asset.

Florida/FL1,519 · 13.4%
California/CA1,415 · 12.5%
Virginia/VA860 · 7.6%
Texas/TX750 · 6.6%
North Carolina/NC473 · 4.2%
New York/NY401 · 3.6%
Maryland/MD330 · 2.9%
Accessible state presence table
StateEstimateShare of communityLocation quotientReliability
Florida/FL1,51913.4%2.009531limited
California/CA1,41512.5%1.068071limited
Virginia/VA8607.6%2.929663limited
Texas/TX7506.6%0.736745limited
North Carolina/NC4734.2%1.307199suppressed
New York/NY4013.6%0.599003suppressed
Maryland/MD3302.9%1.576877suppressed

Metropolitan profiles are withheld in this run because PUMS does not identify metropolitan areas and no research PUMA-to-metro allocation was authorized.

Race, ethnicity, and ancestry

Race, Hispanic or Latino origin, ancestry, country of birth, citizenship, and language remain separate concepts. These are aggregate estimates.

Race distribution

Aian AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 1; public estimate withheld.
Asian AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 7; public estimate withheld.
Black Alone9.0%
Estimate 1,011 ± 448; unweighted sample 23.
Nhpi AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 1; public estimate withheld.
Some Other Race AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 10; public estimate withheld.
Two Or More Races7.7%
Estimate 874 ± 320; unweighted sample 34.
White Alone79.4%
Estimate 8,973 ± 1,081; unweighted sample 456.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Hispanic or Latino origin

Hispanic Or LatinoSuppressed
Unweighted sample 20; public estimate withheld.
Not Hispanic Or Latino96.5%
Estimate 10,903 ± 1,244; unweighted sample 512.
Other Or Suppressed3.5%
Estimate 391 ± Not enough reliable data; unweighted sample 20.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Ancestry composition is not published because the available country crosswalk is pending research deterministic validation. Hispanic or Latino origin is not treated as race.

Age, households, and economic structure

Age

18 To 3430.4%
Estimate 3,434 ± 648; unweighted sample 133.
35 To 4925.6%
Estimate 2,894 ± 546; unweighted sample 138.
50 To 6422.3%
Estimate 2,517 ± 603; unweighted sample 127.
65 And Over15.5%
Estimate 1,756 ± 404; unweighted sample 107.
Under 186.1%
Estimate 693 ± 304; unweighted sample 27.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Sex as reported by the source

Female50.6%
Estimate 5,713 ± 748; unweighted sample 258.
Male49.4%
Estimate 5,581 ± 911; unweighted sample 274.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Nativity and citizenship

Born Abroad Of Us Parent48.9%
Estimate 5,522 ± 846; unweighted sample 265.
Naturalized Us Citizen27.9%
Estimate 3,155 ± 644; unweighted sample 160.
Not Us Citizen23.2%
Estimate 2,617 ± 682; unweighted sample 107.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Period of entry

2010 To 201914.3%
Estimate 1,620 ± 542; unweighted sample 63.
2020 Or Later3.3%
Estimate 378 ± 164; unweighted sample 25.
Before 201082.3%
Estimate 9,296 ± 1,192; unweighted sample 444.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Age at migration

18 To 3423.9%
Estimate 2,695 ± 542; unweighted sample 139.
35 To 494.6%
Estimate 514 ± 211; unweighted sample 29.
50 And OverSuppressed
Unweighted sample 6; public estimate withheld.
Under 1870.6%
Estimate 7,971 ± 1,045; unweighted sample 358.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Language and English proficiency

English Only61.2%
Estimate 6,868 ± 820; unweighted sample 334.
Not At AllSuppressed
Unweighted sample 1; public estimate withheld.
Not WellSuppressed
Unweighted sample 10; public estimate withheld.
Very Well32.2%
Estimate 3,616 ± 715; unweighted sample 163.
WellSuppressed
Unweighted sample 19; public estimate withheld.
Other Or Suppressed6.6%
Estimate 738 ± Not enough reliable data; unweighted sample 30.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Household size

Five Or More People13.4%
Estimate 1,314 ± 411; unweighted sample 44.
One Person13.8%
Estimate 1,351 ± 471; unweighted sample 51.
Three Or Four People33.7%
Estimate 3,306 ± 668; unweighted sample 157.
Two People39.1%
Estimate 3,831 ± 642; unweighted sample 194.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: moderate.

Household type

Family Household69.1%
Estimate 6,770 ± 765; unweighted sample 342.
Nonfamily Household30.9%
Estimate 3,032 ± 705; unweighted sample 104.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: moderate.

Multigenerational household

Multigenerational5.9%
Estimate 582 ± 271; unweighted sample 25.
Not Multigenerational94.1%
Estimate 9,220 ± 1,068; unweighted sample 421.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: moderate.

Households with children

Children Present29.8%
Estimate 2,925 ± 552; unweighted sample 130.
No Children Present70.2%
Estimate 6,877 ± 1,020; unweighted sample 316.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: moderate.

Education

Bachelors24.4%
Estimate 2,290 ± 468; unweighted sample 110.
Graduate Or Professional19.5%
Estimate 1,828 ± 434; unweighted sample 104.
High School Or Equivalent23.2%
Estimate 2,177 ± 673; unweighted sample 81.
Less Than High SchoolSuppressed
Unweighted sample 17; public estimate withheld.
Some College Or Associate29.8%
Estimate 2,799 ± 581; unweighted sample 134.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Employment

Armed ForcesSuppressed
Unweighted sample 2; public estimate withheld.
Employed68.2%
Estimate 7,329 ± 1,037; unweighted sample 316.
Not In Labor Force28.8%
Estimate 3,093 ± 557; unweighted sample 182.
UnemployedSuppressed
Unweighted sample 12; public estimate withheld.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Occupation

Management Business Science Arts50.7%
Estimate 4,534 ± 723; unweighted sample 220.
Military SpecificSuppressed
Unweighted sample 2; public estimate withheld.
Natural Resources Construction Maintenance7.4%
Estimate 657 ± 311; unweighted sample 21.
Production Transportation Material Moving9.1%
Estimate 814 ± 351; unweighted sample 31.
Sales And Office17.0%
Estimate 1,521 ± 430; unweighted sample 68.
Service15.4%
Estimate 1,375 ± 382; unweighted sample 55.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Industry

Agriculture Forestry Fishing MiningSuppressed
Unweighted sample 2; public estimate withheld.
Arts Entertainment Hospitality8.8%
Estimate 777 ± 285; unweighted sample 35.
ConstructionSuppressed
Unweighted sample 13; public estimate withheld.
Education Health Social Services23.4%
Estimate 2,073 ± 426; unweighted sample 105.
Finance Insurance Real Estate8.8%
Estimate 782 ± 359; unweighted sample 27.
InformationSuppressed
Unweighted sample 11; public estimate withheld.
Manufacturing4.4%
Estimate 388 ± 163; unweighted sample 25.
MilitarySuppressed
Unweighted sample 2; public estimate withheld.
Other ServicesSuppressed
Unweighted sample 19; public estimate withheld.
Professional Administrative15.1%
Estimate 1,339 ± 367; unweighted sample 62.
Public AdministrationSuppressed
Unweighted sample 19; public estimate withheld.
Retail Trade11.0%
Estimate 971 ± 337; unweighted sample 40.
Transportation UtilitiesSuppressed
Unweighted sample 18; public estimate withheld.
Wholesale TradeSuppressed
Unweighted sample 13; public estimate withheld.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Personal income

100000 Or More19.5%
Estimate 2,120 ± 432; unweighted sample 122.
1 To 2499917.4%
Estimate 1,899 ± 364; unweighted sample 109.
25000 To 4999921.2%
Estimate 2,303 ± 625; unweighted sample 102.
50000 To 9999928.0%
Estimate 3,046 ± 614; unweighted sample 115.
Zero Or Negative14.0%
Estimate 1,519 ± 519; unweighted sample 68.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Poverty

100 To 199 Percent9.3%
Estimate 1,028 ± 355; unweighted sample 50.
200 To 399 Percent32.3%
Estimate 3,556 ± 884; unweighted sample 130.
400 Percent Or More49.9%
Estimate 5,504 ± 744; unweighted sample 275.
Below 100 Percent8.5%
Estimate 938 ± 358; unweighted sample 43.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: moderate.

Health insurance

Covered93.6%
Estimate 10,569 ± 1,308; unweighted sample 498.
Not Covered6.4%
Estimate 725 ± 228; unweighted sample 34.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Disability

With Disability14.8%
Estimate 1,668 ± 472; unweighted sample 87.
Without Disability85.2%
Estimate 9,626 ± 1,099; unweighted sample 445.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Housing tenure

Occupied Without Cash RentSuppressed
Unweighted sample 4; public estimate withheld.
Owned Free And Clear20.9%
Estimate 2,050 ± 415; unweighted sample 110.
Owned With Mortgage46.6%
Estimate 4,563 ± 751; unweighted sample 217.
Rented32.1%
Estimate 3,144 ± 655; unweighted sample 115.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Housing-cost burden

30 To 49 PercentSuppressed
Unweighted sample 14; public estimate withheld.
50 Percent Or More19.8%
Estimate 573 ± 239; unweighted sample 24.
Under 30 Percent65.0%
Estimate 1,886 ± 459; unweighted sample 73.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Residential tenure length

Established Residence36.0%
Estimate 3,530 ± 661; unweighted sample 184.
Mid Term Residence37.6%
Estimate 3,686 ± 586; unweighted sample 165.
Recent Move26.4%
Estimate 2,586 ± 568; unweighted sample 97.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: moderate.

Residential mobility

Arrived From Outside UsSuppressed
Unweighted sample 13; public estimate withheld.
Different House In Us15.0%
Estimate 1,692 ± 511; unweighted sample 64.
Same House83.2%
Estimate 9,402 ± 1,109; unweighted sample 455.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

How this community differs across states

Highest community presence

  1. Florida/FL — 1,519
  2. California/CA — 1,415
  3. Virginia/VA — 860
  4. Texas/TX — 750
  5. North Carolina/NC — 473
  6. New York/NY — 401
  7. Maryland/MD — 330

Highest location quotient

  1. Virginia/VA — 2.93
  2. Florida/FL — 2.01
  3. Maryland/MD — 1.58
  4. North Carolina/NC — 1.31
  5. California/CA — 1.07
  6. Texas/TX — 0.74
  7. New York/NY — 0.60

Closest surrounding demographic contexts

  1. Vermont/VT — 94.4%
  2. North Dakota/ND — 93.7%
  3. Montana/MT — 93.0%
  4. New Hampshire/NH — 90.8%
  5. Virginia/VA — 90.4%
  6. Washington/WA — 90.4%
  7. Maryland/MD — 90.3%
  8. Minnesota/MN — 90.2%
  9. Maine/ME — 90.1%
  10. Delaware/DE — 90.0%

Highest presence and closest surrounding context answer different questions and are never substituted for one another.

How this community compares with the United States

State-context comparisons use the same source period and composition schema. National community averages should not be treated as characteristics of any person.

The U.S.–Iceland community contains materially different racial, ethnic, generational, linguistic, geographic, household, and socioeconomic profiles. National averages should not be treated as characteristics of every person.

Closest demographic peers

Peer rankings use population and settlement, migration, race and ethnicity, age and household, education and economic structure, language, and housing as separately disclosed dimensions.

Closest demographic peer 1

U.S.–Libya community

86.1% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 86.1% · without: 86.1% · rank change: 0.

Strongest similarities: Housing and mobility, Age and household, Education, work, and income

Largest differences: Migration, nativity, and generation, Population and settlement, Education, work, and income

View dimension scores
Age and household
94.4%
Education, work, and income
91.2%
Housing and mobility
95.4%
Migration, nativity, and generation
80.1%
Population and settlement
81.3%
Population scale
91.9%
Settlement concentration
94.1%
State footprint
57.9%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Closest demographic peer 2

U.S.–Norway community

84.8% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 84.8% · without: 84.8% · rank change: 0.

Strongest similarities: Education, work, and income, Housing and mobility, Age and household

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Migration, nativity, and generation, Age and household

View dimension scores
Age and household
95.0%
Education, work, and income
96.9%
Housing and mobility
95.7%
Migration, nativity, and generation
80.8%
Population and settlement
73.8%
Population scale
88.0%
Settlement concentration
85.4%
State footprint
48.1%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Closest demographic peer 3

U.S.–Zambia community

84.3% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 84.3% · without: 84.3% · rank change: 0.

Strongest similarities: Age and household, Housing and mobility, Education, work, and income

Largest differences: Migration, nativity, and generation, Population and settlement, Education, work, and income

View dimension scores
Age and household
93.6%
Education, work, and income
91.9%
Housing and mobility
93.5%
Migration, nativity, and generation
72.1%
Population and settlement
81.5%
Population scale
92.4%
Settlement concentration
95.8%
State footprint
56.4%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Largest measured differences

The comparison asset reports the lowest demographic structural similarities without describing communities as enemies, opposites, incompatible groups, or unlikely allies.

  1. U.S.–Mexico community — 48.9% measured structural similarity
  2. U.S.–Honduras community — 49.7% measured structural similarity
  3. U.S.–Guatemala community — 50.4% measured structural similarity

Explore peers in Ally Finder

Data quality

Profile state
eligible_high_reliability
Reliable dimensions
15
Observed basis
Country of birth in the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year PUMS

Suppressed cells remain labeled. Missing values and shared zeroes do not create similarity.

What should not be inferred

Aggregate demographic similarity does not establish agreement, alliance, representation, consent, endorsement, political behavior, nationality, dual citizenship, religion, caste, tribe, sect, or individual identity.

How the comparison was calculated

Dimension-specific categorical distributions use square-root Jensen–Shannon distance; ordered distributions use bounded Wasserstein distance; population totals use log-scaled distance; and state footprints use Jensen–Shannon distance. Available reliable dimensions are combined with versioned weights. KNN is a retrieval method, not a public claim about alliance.

Weights · Sources · Data quality