WS MUSINGSWORLD SYSTEMS MUSINGS · INTERSECTIONALITY FINDER

U.S. bi-national and heritage community · eligible high reliability

U.S.–Norway community

A country-specific aggregate research profile. It does not identify dual citizens and should not be treated as a description of every person.

What this record observesForeign birth: true · reported ancestry: false · citizenship status available: true · confirmed dual citizenship: false.

Community at a glance

Observed country-of-birth population25,889Margin of error ± 1,952
Foreign-born estimate21,333Margin of error ± 1,764
Unweighted sample1,446Reliability: high
Citizenship compositionNot Us Citizen 44.3% · Naturalized Us Citizen 38.1%Status in the aggregate cohort, not loyalty or civic commitment
Ancestry-linked estimateNot availableCrosswalk remains under governance review
Leading statesCalifornia, Texas, New YorkPresence, not demographic resemblance
Leading metrosNot availableNo research PUMA-to-metro allocation
Source period2020–2024ACS 5-year PUMS

Where this community lives

State count and share view. Location quotient and state-relative fields are available in the underlying state-profile asset.

California/CA4,272 · 16.5%
Texas/TX2,626 · 10.1%
New York/NY2,600 · 10.0%
Florida/FL2,167 · 8.4%
Washington/WA1,637 · 6.3%
New Jersey/NJ883 · 3.4%
Oregon/OR800 · 3.1%
Connecticut/CT746 · 2.9%
Pennsylvania/PA716 · 2.8%
Illinois/IL649 · 2.5%
Accessible state presence table
StateEstimateShare of communityLocation quotientReliability
California/CA4,27216.5%1.406719moderate
Texas/TX2,62610.1%1.125339limited
New York/NY2,60010.0%1.694299limited
Florida/FL2,1678.4%1.250629limited
Washington/WA1,6376.3%2.709485limited
New Jersey/NJ8833.4%1.222548limited
Oregon/OR8003.1%2.432717limited
Connecticut/CT7462.9%2.662679limited
Pennsylvania/PA7162.8%0.711503limited
Illinois/IL6492.5%0.661375limited

Metropolitan profiles are withheld in this run because PUMS does not identify metropolitan areas and no research PUMA-to-metro allocation was authorized.

Race, ethnicity, and ancestry

Race, Hispanic or Latino origin, ancestry, country of birth, citizenship, and language remain separate concepts. These are aggregate estimates.

Race distribution

Aian AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 1; public estimate withheld.
Asian Alone2.3%
Estimate 595 ± 225; unweighted sample 31.
Black AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 7; public estimate withheld.
Nhpi AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 1; public estimate withheld.
Some Other Race AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 7; public estimate withheld.
Two Or More Races2.0%
Estimate 525 ± 217; unweighted sample 42.
White Alone93.1%
Estimate 24,091 ± 1,892; unweighted sample 1357.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Hispanic or Latino origin

Hispanic Or LatinoSuppressed
Unweighted sample 18; public estimate withheld.
Not Hispanic Or Latino98.6%
Estimate 25,515 ± 1,917; unweighted sample 1428.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Ancestry composition is not published because the available country crosswalk is pending research deterministic validation. Hispanic or Latino origin is not treated as race.

Age, households, and economic structure

Age

18 To 3423.3%
Estimate 6,044 ± 965; unweighted sample 293.
35 To 4916.5%
Estimate 4,262 ± 783; unweighted sample 222.
50 To 6421.9%
Estimate 5,666 ± 588; unweighted sample 321.
65 And Over32.3%
Estimate 8,368 ± 782; unweighted sample 536.
Under 186.0%
Estimate 1,549 ± 527; unweighted sample 74.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Sex as reported by the source

Female53.0%
Estimate 13,718 ± 1,432; unweighted sample 751.
Male47.0%
Estimate 12,171 ± 1,106; unweighted sample 695.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Nativity and citizenship

Born Abroad Of Us Parent17.6%
Estimate 4,556 ± 734; unweighted sample 244.
Naturalized Us Citizen38.1%
Estimate 9,855 ± 886; unweighted sample 586.
Not Us Citizen44.3%
Estimate 11,478 ± 1,449; unweighted sample 616.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Period of entry

2010 To 201916.9%
Estimate 4,382 ± 1,004; unweighted sample 229.
2020 Or Later11.3%
Estimate 2,918 ± 844; unweighted sample 146.
Before 201071.8%
Estimate 18,589 ± 1,332; unweighted sample 1071.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Age at migration

18 To 3444.3%
Estimate 11,457 ± 1,269; unweighted sample 614.
35 To 497.4%
Estimate 1,912 ± 344; unweighted sample 121.
50 And Over2.9%
Estimate 751 ± 255; unweighted sample 44.
Under 1845.5%
Estimate 11,769 ± 1,202; unweighted sample 667.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Language and English proficiency

English Only47.4%
Estimate 12,085 ± 1,113; unweighted sample 687.
Not WellSuppressed
Unweighted sample 13; public estimate withheld.
Very Well46.1%
Estimate 11,743 ± 1,210; unweighted sample 664.
Well5.5%
Estimate 1,407 ± 421; unweighted sample 67.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Household size

Five Or More People8.5%
Estimate 1,862 ± 406; unweighted sample 109.
One Person19.5%
Estimate 4,265 ± 664; unweighted sample 224.
Three Or Four People29.6%
Estimate 6,467 ± 926; unweighted sample 341.
Two People42.4%
Estimate 9,261 ± 879; unweighted sample 523.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Household type

Family Household69.1%
Estimate 15,092 ± 1,319; unweighted sample 880.
Nonfamily Household30.9%
Estimate 6,763 ± 767; unweighted sample 317.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Multigenerational household

Multigenerational3.0%
Estimate 661 ± 238; unweighted sample 35.
Not Multigenerational97.0%
Estimate 21,194 ± 1,530; unweighted sample 1162.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Households with children

Children Present24.3%
Estimate 5,305 ± 779; unweighted sample 282.
No Children Present75.7%
Estimate 16,550 ± 1,209; unweighted sample 915.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Education

Bachelors29.4%
Estimate 6,262 ± 795; unweighted sample 317.
Graduate Or Professional28.5%
Estimate 6,073 ± 863; unweighted sample 341.
High School Or Equivalent12.1%
Estimate 2,589 ± 438; unweighted sample 163.
Less Than High School2.3%
Estimate 497 ± 164; unweighted sample 38.
Some College Or Associate27.7%
Estimate 5,904 ± 763; unweighted sample 336.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Employment

Armed ForcesSuppressed
Unweighted sample 3; public estimate withheld.
Employed51.6%
Estimate 12,672 ± 1,236; unweighted sample 656.
Not In Labor Force46.7%
Estimate 11,471 ± 1,263; unweighted sample 703.
Unemployed1.5%
Estimate 359 ± 140; unweighted sample 22.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Occupation

Management Business Science Arts62.5%
Estimate 10,191 ± 1,037; unweighted sample 534.
Military SpecificSuppressed
Unweighted sample 2; public estimate withheld.
Natural Resources Construction Maintenance4.5%
Estimate 736 ± 251; unweighted sample 40.
Production Transportation Material Moving9.7%
Estimate 1,578 ± 390; unweighted sample 65.
Sales And Office16.5%
Estimate 2,682 ± 537; unweighted sample 153.
Service6.6%
Estimate 1,078 ± 288; unweighted sample 77.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Industry

Agriculture Forestry Fishing MiningSuppressed
Unweighted sample 17; public estimate withheld.
Arts Entertainment Hospitality7.2%
Estimate 1,132 ± 335; unweighted sample 70.
Construction4.4%
Estimate 693 ± 222; unweighted sample 36.
Education Health Social Services23.3%
Estimate 3,664 ± 554; unweighted sample 200.
Finance Insurance Real Estate7.5%
Estimate 1,177 ± 318; unweighted sample 69.
Information2.4%
Estimate 373 ± 158; unweighted sample 20.
Manufacturing7.7%
Estimate 1,204 ± 275; unweighted sample 67.
MilitarySuppressed
Unweighted sample 3; public estimate withheld.
Other Services4.1%
Estimate 644 ± 267; unweighted sample 41.
Professional Administrative18.6%
Estimate 2,923 ± 439; unweighted sample 159.
Public Administration3.5%
Estimate 548 ± 204; unweighted sample 34.
Retail Trade10.7%
Estimate 1,685 ± 538; unweighted sample 73.
Transportation Utilities6.9%
Estimate 1,078 ± 396; unweighted sample 45.
Wholesale TradeSuppressed
Unweighted sample 19; public estimate withheld.
Other Or Suppressed3.9%
Estimate 609 ± Not enough reliable data; unweighted sample 39.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Personal income

100000 Or More26.6%
Estimate 6,538 ± 786; unweighted sample 361.
1 To 2499923.3%
Estimate 5,725 ± 613; unweighted sample 371.
25000 To 4999918.3%
Estimate 4,501 ± 663; unweighted sample 236.
50000 To 9999920.7%
Estimate 5,102 ± 733; unweighted sample 257.
Zero Or Negative11.2%
Estimate 2,752 ± 748; unweighted sample 162.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Poverty

100 To 199 Percent9.5%
Estimate 2,338 ± 533; unweighted sample 125.
200 To 399 Percent20.9%
Estimate 5,160 ± 629; unweighted sample 280.
400 Percent Or More60.1%
Estimate 14,848 ± 1,507; unweighted sample 803.
Below 100 Percent9.6%
Estimate 2,372 ± 742; unweighted sample 125.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Health insurance

Covered95.6%
Estimate 24,754 ± 1,970; unweighted sample 1381.
Not Covered4.4%
Estimate 1,135 ± 389; unweighted sample 65.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Disability

With Disability14.0%
Estimate 3,616 ± 602; unweighted sample 231.
Without Disability86.0%
Estimate 22,273 ± 1,911; unweighted sample 1215.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Housing tenure

Occupied Without Cash RentSuppressed
Unweighted sample 14; public estimate withheld.
Owned Free And Clear27.7%
Estimate 6,062 ± 555; unweighted sample 398.
Owned With Mortgage42.3%
Estimate 9,240 ± 936; unweighted sample 526.
Rented28.7%
Estimate 6,274 ± 918; unweighted sample 259.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Housing-cost burden

30 To 49 Percent20.2%
Estimate 1,222 ± 283; unweighted sample 61.
50 Percent Or More21.7%
Estimate 1,310 ± 420; unweighted sample 51.
Under 30 Percent58.1%
Estimate 3,508 ± 736; unweighted sample 141.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: moderate.

Residential tenure length

Established Residence42.4%
Estimate 9,264 ± 902; unweighted sample 573.
Mid Term Residence33.4%
Estimate 7,295 ± 774; unweighted sample 399.
Recent Move24.2%
Estimate 5,296 ± 861; unweighted sample 225.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Residential mobility

Arrived From Outside Us9.2%
Estimate 2,389 ± 1,070; unweighted sample 101.
Different House In Us11.8%
Estimate 3,056 ± 535; unweighted sample 150.
Same House78.9%
Estimate 20,406 ± 1,507; unweighted sample 1193.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

How this community differs across states

Highest community presence

  1. California/CA — 4,272
  2. Texas/TX — 2,626
  3. New York/NY — 2,600
  4. Florida/FL — 2,167
  5. Washington/WA — 1,637
  6. New Jersey/NJ — 883
  7. Oregon/OR — 800
  8. Connecticut/CT — 746
  9. Pennsylvania/PA — 716
  10. Illinois/IL — 649

Highest location quotient

  1. Washington/WA — 2.71
  2. Connecticut/CT — 2.66
  3. Oregon/OR — 2.43
  4. Utah/UT — 1.87
  5. New York/NY — 1.69
  6. California/CA — 1.41
  7. Colorado/CO — 1.34
  8. Florida/FL — 1.25
  9. New Jersey/NJ — 1.22
  10. Maryland/MD — 1.17

Closest surrounding demographic contexts

  1. New Hampshire/NH — 94.9%
  2. Massachusetts/MA — 94.8%
  3. Connecticut/CT — 94.5%
  4. Vermont/VT — 94.3%
  5. District of Columbia/DC — 94.2%
  6. Maryland/MD — 94.2%
  7. Washington/WA — 93.7%
  8. Minnesota/MN — 93.7%
  9. Rhode Island/RI — 93.6%
  10. Hawaii/HI — 93.6%

Highest presence and closest surrounding context answer different questions and are never substituted for one another.

How this community compares with the United States

State-context comparisons use the same source period and composition schema. National community averages should not be treated as characteristics of any person.

The U.S.–Norway community contains materially different racial, ethnic, generational, linguistic, geographic, household, and socioeconomic profiles. National averages should not be treated as characteristics of every person.

Closest demographic peers

Peer rankings use population and settlement, migration, race and ethnicity, age and household, education and economic structure, language, and housing as separately disclosed dimensions.

Closest demographic peer 1

U.S.–Denmark community

93.9% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 93.9% · without: 93.9% · rank change: 0.

Strongest similarities: Age and household, Education, work, and income, Migration, nativity, and generation

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Housing and mobility, Migration, nativity, and generation

View dimension scores
Age and household
97.8%
Education, work, and income
97.4%
Housing and mobility
93.6%
Migration, nativity, and generation
94.5%
Population and settlement
90.1%
Population scale
98.8%
Settlement concentration
97.2%
State footprint
74.3%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Closest demographic peer 2

U.S.–Switzerland community

93.0% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 93.0% · without: 93.0% · rank change: 0.

Strongest similarities: Age and household, Education, work, and income, Migration, nativity, and generation

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Housing and mobility, Migration, nativity, and generation

View dimension scores
Age and household
97.8%
Education, work, and income
97.3%
Housing and mobility
95.4%
Migration, nativity, and generation
95.9%
Population and settlement
85.9%
Population scale
90.3%
Settlement concentration
96.2%
State footprint
71.0%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Closest demographic peer 3

U.S.–Sweden community

92.2% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 92.2% · without: 92.2% · rank change: 0.

Strongest similarities: Housing and mobility, Age and household, Migration, nativity, and generation

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Education, work, and income, Migration, nativity, and generation

View dimension scores
Age and household
96.2%
Education, work, and income
94.9%
Housing and mobility
97.1%
Migration, nativity, and generation
95.7%
Population and settlement
85.1%
Population scale
89.6%
Settlement concentration
96.0%
State footprint
69.8%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Largest measured differences

The comparison asset reports the lowest demographic structural similarities without describing communities as enemies, opposites, incompatible groups, or unlikely allies.

  1. U.S.–Mexico community — 70.9% measured structural similarity
  2. U.S.–Cuba community — 72.7% measured structural similarity
  3. U.S.–Honduras community — 73.6% measured structural similarity

Explore peers in Ally Finder

Data quality

Profile state
eligible_high_reliability
Reliable dimensions
18
Observed basis
Country of birth in the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year PUMS

Suppressed cells remain labeled. Missing values and shared zeroes do not create similarity.

What should not be inferred

Aggregate demographic similarity does not establish agreement, alliance, representation, consent, endorsement, political behavior, nationality, dual citizenship, religion, caste, tribe, sect, or individual identity.

How the comparison was calculated

Dimension-specific categorical distributions use square-root Jensen–Shannon distance; ordered distributions use bounded Wasserstein distance; population totals use log-scaled distance; and state footprints use Jensen–Shannon distance. Available reliable dimensions are combined with versioned weights. KNN is a retrieval method, not a public claim about alliance.

Weights · Sources · Data quality