WS MUSINGSWORLD SYSTEMS MUSINGS · INTERSECTIONALITY FINDER

U.S. bi-national and heritage community · eligible high reliability

U.S.–Zimbabwe community

A country-specific aggregate research profile. It does not identify dual citizens and should not be treated as a description of every person.

What this record observesForeign birth: true · reported ancestry: false · citizenship status available: true · confirmed dual citizenship: false.

Community at a glance

Observed country-of-birth population31,555Margin of error ± 2,606
Foreign-born estimate29,376Margin of error ± 2,436
Unweighted sample1,248Reliability: high
Citizenship compositionNaturalized Us Citizen 50.2% · Not Us Citizen 42.9%Status in the aggregate cohort, not loyalty or civic commitment
Ancestry-linked estimateNot availableCrosswalk remains under governance review
Leading statesTexas, California, New YorkPresence, not demographic resemblance
Leading metrosNot availableNo research PUMA-to-metro allocation
Source period2020–2024ACS 5-year PUMS

Where this community lives

State count and share view. Location quotient and state-relative fields are available in the underlying state-profile asset.

Texas/TX5,126 · 16.2%
California/CA2,749 · 8.7%
New York/NY2,185 · 6.9%
Indiana/IN1,678 · 5.3%
Florida/FL1,412 · 4.5%
Georgia/GA1,285 · 4.1%
North Carolina/NC1,136 · 3.6%
Maryland/MD1,107 · 3.5%
Ohio/OH1,097 · 3.5%
New Jersey/NJ1,005 · 3.2%
Accessible state presence table
StateEstimateShare of communityLocation quotientReliability
Texas/TX5,12616.2%1.802247limited
California/CA2,7498.7%0.742673limited
New York/NY2,1856.9%1.168195limited
Indiana/IN1,6785.3%2.599618limited
Florida/FL1,4124.5%0.668577limited
Georgia/GA1,2854.1%1.246654limited
North Carolina/NC1,1363.6%1.123669limited
Maryland/MD1,1073.5%1.893264limited
Ohio/OH1,0973.5%0.985876limited
New Jersey/NJ1,0053.2%1.141611limited

Metropolitan profiles are withheld in this run because PUMS does not identify metropolitan areas and no research PUMA-to-metro allocation was authorized.

Race, ethnicity, and ancestry

Race, Hispanic or Latino origin, ancestry, country of birth, citizenship, and language remain separate concepts. These are aggregate estimates.

Race distribution

Asian Alone3.0%
Estimate 958 ± 234; unweighted sample 64.
Black Alone69.2%
Estimate 21,839 ± 2,321; unweighted sample 722.
Nhpi AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 1; public estimate withheld.
Some Other Race AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 17; public estimate withheld.
Two Or More Races8.3%
Estimate 2,614 ± 630; unweighted sample 129.
White Alone17.9%
Estimate 5,655 ± 760; unweighted sample 315.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Hispanic or Latino origin

Hispanic Or LatinoSuppressed
Unweighted sample 9; public estimate withheld.
Not Hispanic Or Latino99.7%
Estimate 31,449 ± 2,587; unweighted sample 1239.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Ancestry composition is not published because the available country crosswalk is pending research deterministic validation. Hispanic or Latino origin is not treated as race.

Age, households, and economic structure

Age

18 To 3427.5%
Estimate 8,685 ± 1,050; unweighted sample 276.
35 To 4932.9%
Estimate 10,374 ± 1,643; unweighted sample 358.
50 To 6420.8%
Estimate 6,550 ± 852; unweighted sample 318.
65 And Over11.2%
Estimate 3,523 ± 523; unweighted sample 212.
Under 187.7%
Estimate 2,423 ± 732; unweighted sample 84.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Sex as reported by the source

Female46.8%
Estimate 14,762 ± 1,447; unweighted sample 615.
Male53.2%
Estimate 16,793 ± 1,776; unweighted sample 633.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Nativity and citizenship

Born Abroad Of Us Parent6.9%
Estimate 2,179 ± 580; unweighted sample 89.
Naturalized Us Citizen50.2%
Estimate 15,851 ± 1,426; unweighted sample 695.
Not Us Citizen42.9%
Estimate 13,525 ± 1,725; unweighted sample 464.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Period of entry

2010 To 201926.7%
Estimate 8,411 ± 1,234; unweighted sample 296.
2020 Or Later15.4%
Estimate 4,861 ± 1,143; unweighted sample 171.
Before 201057.9%
Estimate 18,283 ± 1,703; unweighted sample 781.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Age at migration

18 To 3444.8%
Estimate 14,128 ± 1,695; unweighted sample 547.
35 To 4915.2%
Estimate 4,800 ± 794; unweighted sample 216.
50 And Over3.6%
Estimate 1,141 ± 330; unweighted sample 55.
Under 1836.4%
Estimate 11,486 ± 1,448; unweighted sample 430.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Language and English proficiency

English Only47.0%
Estimate 14,694 ± 1,552; unweighted sample 624.
Not At AllSuppressed
Unweighted sample 6; public estimate withheld.
Not WellSuppressed
Unweighted sample 12; public estimate withheld.
Very Well44.5%
Estimate 13,900 ± 1,856; unweighted sample 521.
Well7.0%
Estimate 2,184 ± 620; unweighted sample 77.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Household size

Five Or More People14.5%
Estimate 3,197 ± 546; unweighted sample 118.
One Person21.2%
Estimate 4,672 ± 900; unweighted sample 154.
Three Or Four People33.3%
Estimate 7,357 ± 1,080; unweighted sample 307.
Two People31.0%
Estimate 6,848 ± 845; unweighted sample 312.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Household type

Family Household72.2%
Estimate 15,946 ± 1,378; unweighted sample 675.
Nonfamily Household27.8%
Estimate 6,128 ± 917; unweighted sample 216.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Multigenerational household

Multigenerational5.5%
Estimate 1,211 ± 404; unweighted sample 44.
Not Multigenerational94.5%
Estimate 20,863 ± 1,713; unweighted sample 847.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Households with children

Children Present35.6%
Estimate 7,855 ± 1,084; unweighted sample 291.
No Children Present64.4%
Estimate 14,219 ± 1,493; unweighted sample 600.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Education

Bachelors26.9%
Estimate 7,213 ± 1,070; unweighted sample 302.
Graduate Or Professional34.9%
Estimate 9,372 ± 1,141; unweighted sample 363.
High School Or Equivalent11.2%
Estimate 3,005 ± 673; unweighted sample 110.
Less Than High School4.1%
Estimate 1,104 ± 430; unweighted sample 35.
Some College Or Associate22.9%
Estimate 6,150 ± 998; unweighted sample 247.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Employment

Armed ForcesSuppressed
Unweighted sample 4; public estimate withheld.
Employed73.7%
Estimate 21,555 ± 2,026; unweighted sample 821.
Not In Labor Force23.2%
Estimate 6,788 ± 985; unweighted sample 318.
Unemployed2.5%
Estimate 736 ± 231; unweighted sample 29.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Occupation

Management Business Science Arts61.1%
Estimate 15,588 ± 1,437; unweighted sample 615.
Military SpecificSuppressed
Unweighted sample 1; public estimate withheld.
Natural Resources Construction Maintenance3.6%
Estimate 920 ± 335; unweighted sample 30.
Production Transportation Material Moving6.3%
Estimate 1,597 ± 498; unweighted sample 57.
Sales And Office15.2%
Estimate 3,883 ± 495; unweighted sample 172.
Service13.7%
Estimate 3,494 ± 991; unweighted sample 107.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Industry

Agriculture Forestry Fishing MiningSuppressed
Unweighted sample 5; public estimate withheld.
Arts Entertainment Hospitality6.3%
Estimate 1,601 ± 691; unweighted sample 51.
Construction3.5%
Estimate 882 ± 318; unweighted sample 36.
Education Health Social Services29.9%
Estimate 7,544 ± 1,086; unweighted sample 298.
Finance Insurance Real Estate9.1%
Estimate 2,308 ± 620; unweighted sample 83.
Information4.3%
Estimate 1,098 ± 435; unweighted sample 35.
Manufacturing6.3%
Estimate 1,579 ± 435; unweighted sample 60.
MilitarySuppressed
Unweighted sample 4; public estimate withheld.
Other Services5.1%
Estimate 1,297 ± 382; unweighted sample 54.
Professional Administrative16.2%
Estimate 4,102 ± 582; unweighted sample 168.
Public Administration4.7%
Estimate 1,187 ± 446; unweighted sample 39.
Retail Trade6.2%
Estimate 1,562 ± 454; unweighted sample 74.
Transportation Utilities5.0%
Estimate 1,271 ± 389; unweighted sample 46.
Wholesale TradeSuppressed
Unweighted sample 17; public estimate withheld.
Other Or Suppressed3.2%
Estimate 819 ± Not enough reliable data; unweighted sample 26.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Personal income

100000 Or More24.8%
Estimate 7,301 ± 1,019; unweighted sample 302.
1 To 2499919.6%
Estimate 5,772 ± 803; unweighted sample 252.
25000 To 4999915.3%
Estimate 4,491 ± 759; unweighted sample 191.
50000 To 9999928.6%
Estimate 8,420 ± 1,254; unweighted sample 291.
Zero Or Negative11.6%
Estimate 3,420 ± 796; unweighted sample 141.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Poverty

100 To 199 Percent10.0%
Estimate 3,065 ± 942; unweighted sample 103.
200 To 399 Percent23.4%
Estimate 7,185 ± 1,205; unweighted sample 270.
400 Percent Or More57.3%
Estimate 17,612 ± 1,835; unweighted sample 693.
Below 100 Percent9.4%
Estimate 2,897 ± 689; unweighted sample 110.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Health insurance

Covered90.5%
Estimate 28,557 ± 2,357; unweighted sample 1148.
Not Covered9.5%
Estimate 2,998 ± 914; unweighted sample 100.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Disability

With Disability6.3%
Estimate 1,981 ± 421; unweighted sample 101.
Without Disability93.7%
Estimate 29,574 ± 2,490; unweighted sample 1147.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Housing tenure

Occupied Without Cash Rent2.1%
Estimate 471 ± 213; unweighted sample 20.
Owned Free And Clear14.5%
Estimate 3,204 ± 545; unweighted sample 169.
Owned With Mortgage44.6%
Estimate 9,854 ± 1,234; unweighted sample 424.
Rented38.7%
Estimate 8,545 ± 1,016; unweighted sample 278.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Housing-cost burden

30 To 49 Percent19.1%
Estimate 1,601 ± 427; unweighted sample 66.
50 Percent Or More18.8%
Estimate 1,580 ± 405; unweighted sample 55.
Under 30 Percent62.1%
Estimate 5,216 ± 835; unweighted sample 153.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: moderate.

Residential tenure length

Established Residence23.1%
Estimate 5,093 ± 636; unweighted sample 272.
Mid Term Residence43.9%
Estimate 9,684 ± 1,070; unweighted sample 367.
Recent Move33.1%
Estimate 7,297 ± 1,049; unweighted sample 252.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Residential mobility

Arrived From Outside Us4.6%
Estimate 1,463 ± 449; unweighted sample 63.
Different House In Us13.7%
Estimate 4,314 ± 725; unweighted sample 161.
Same House81.7%
Estimate 25,709 ± 2,309; unweighted sample 1023.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

How this community differs across states

Highest community presence

  1. Texas/TX — 5,126
  2. California/CA — 2,749
  3. New York/NY — 2,185
  4. Indiana/IN — 1,678
  5. Florida/FL — 1,412
  6. Georgia/GA — 1,285
  7. North Carolina/NC — 1,136
  8. Maryland/MD — 1,107
  9. Ohio/OH — 1,097
  10. New Jersey/NJ — 1,005

Highest location quotient

  1. Indiana/IN — 2.60
  2. Maryland/MD — 1.89
  3. Texas/TX — 1.80
  4. Oregon/OR — 1.32
  5. Georgia/GA — 1.25
  6. New York/NY — 1.17
  7. Virginia/VA — 1.16
  8. Massachusetts/MA — 1.15
  9. New Jersey/NJ — 1.14
  10. North Carolina/NC — 1.12

Closest surrounding demographic contexts

  1. Colorado/CO — 94.2%
  2. District of Columbia/DC — 94.0%
  3. Maryland/MD — 93.6%
  4. New Jersey/NJ — 93.6%
  5. Washington/WA — 92.9%
  6. Virginia/VA — 92.9%
  7. Connecticut/CT — 92.7%
  8. Massachusetts/MA — 92.6%
  9. New Hampshire/NH — 92.6%
  10. Alaska/AK — 92.4%

Highest presence and closest surrounding context answer different questions and are never substituted for one another.

How this community compares with the United States

State-context comparisons use the same source period and composition schema. National community averages should not be treated as characteristics of any person.

The U.S.–Zimbabwe community contains materially different racial, ethnic, generational, linguistic, geographic, household, and socioeconomic profiles. National averages should not be treated as characteristics of every person.

Closest demographic peers

Peer rankings use population and settlement, migration, race and ethnicity, age and household, education and economic structure, language, and housing as separately disclosed dimensions.

Closest demographic peer 1

U.S.–Kuwait community

91.4% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 91.4% · without: 91.4% · rank change: 0.

Strongest similarities: Education, work, and income, Age and household, Migration, nativity, and generation

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Housing and mobility, Migration, nativity, and generation

View dimension scores
Age and household
92.8%
Education, work, and income
95.1%
Housing and mobility
92.3%
Migration, nativity, and generation
92.6%
Population and settlement
87.5%
Population scale
96.4%
Settlement concentration
94.6%
State footprint
71.6%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Closest demographic peer 2

U.S.–Sri Lanka community

90.3% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 90.3% · without: 90.3% · rank change: 0.

Strongest similarities: Age and household, Education, work, and income, Housing and mobility

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Migration, nativity, and generation, Housing and mobility

View dimension scores
Age and household
96.4%
Education, work, and income
96.3%
Housing and mobility
96.0%
Migration, nativity, and generation
92.7%
Population and settlement
80.6%
Population scale
90.6%
Settlement concentration
90.7%
State footprint
60.6%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Closest demographic peer 3

U.S.–New Zealand community

90.2% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 90.2% · without: 90.2% · rank change: 0.

Strongest similarities: Age and household, Housing and mobility, Education, work, and income

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Migration, nativity, and generation, Education, work, and income

View dimension scores
Age and household
97.0%
Education, work, and income
93.4%
Housing and mobility
95.4%
Migration, nativity, and generation
92.5%
Population and settlement
82.3%
Population scale
96.2%
Settlement concentration
95.9%
State footprint
54.8%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Largest measured differences

The comparison asset reports the lowest demographic structural similarities without describing communities as enemies, opposites, incompatible groups, or unlikely allies.

  1. U.S.–Mexico community — 69.8% measured structural similarity
  2. U.S.–Cuba community — 73.1% measured structural similarity
  3. U.S.–Guatemala community — 74.8% measured structural similarity

Explore peers in Ally Finder

Data quality

Profile state
eligible_high_reliability
Reliable dimensions
19
Observed basis
Country of birth in the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year PUMS

Suppressed cells remain labeled. Missing values and shared zeroes do not create similarity.

What should not be inferred

Aggregate demographic similarity does not establish agreement, alliance, representation, consent, endorsement, political behavior, nationality, dual citizenship, religion, caste, tribe, sect, or individual identity.

How the comparison was calculated

Dimension-specific categorical distributions use square-root Jensen–Shannon distance; ordered distributions use bounded Wasserstein distance; population totals use log-scaled distance; and state footprints use Jensen–Shannon distance. Available reliable dimensions are combined with versioned weights. KNN is a retrieval method, not a public claim about alliance.

Weights · Sources · Data quality