WS MUSINGSWORLD SYSTEMS MUSINGS · INTERSECTIONALITY FINDER

U.S. bi-national and heritage community · eligible high reliability

U.S.–Kuwait community

A country-specific aggregate research profile. It does not identify dual citizens and should not be treated as a description of every person.

What this record observesForeign birth: true · reported ancestry: false · citizenship status available: true · confirmed dual citizenship: false.

Community at a glance

Observed country-of-birth population40,546Margin of error ± 2,943
Foreign-born estimate35,931Margin of error ± 2,860
Unweighted sample1,611Reliability: high
Citizenship compositionNaturalized Us Citizen 57.5% · Not Us Citizen 31.1%Status in the aggregate cohort, not loyalty or civic commitment
Ancestry-linked estimateNot availableCrosswalk remains under governance review
Leading statesCalifornia, Texas, FloridaPresence, not demographic resemblance
Leading metrosNot availableNo research PUMA-to-metro allocation
Source period2020–2024ACS 5-year PUMS

Where this community lives

State count and share view. Location quotient and state-relative fields are available in the underlying state-profile asset.

California/CA7,070 · 17.4%
Texas/TX5,670 · 14.0%
Florida/FL3,182 · 7.8%
Illinois/IL2,241 · 5.5%
New York/NY2,124 · 5.2%
Ohio/OH1,379 · 3.4%
Virginia/VA1,355 · 3.3%
New Jersey/NJ1,326 · 3.3%
Michigan/MI1,278 · 3.2%
Massachusetts/MA1,164 · 2.9%
Accessible state presence table
StateEstimateShare of communityLocation quotientReliability
California/CA7,07017.4%1.486492moderate
Texas/TX5,67014.0%1.551454moderate
Florida/FL3,1827.8%1.172565limited
Illinois/IL2,2415.5%1.458184limited
New York/NY2,1245.2%0.883769limited
Ohio/OH1,3793.4%0.964495limited
Virginia/VA1,3553.3%1.285755limited
New Jersey/NJ1,3263.3%1.172238limited
Michigan/MI1,2783.2%1.047522limited
Massachusetts/MA1,1642.9%1.364981limited

Metropolitan profiles are withheld in this run because PUMS does not identify metropolitan areas and no research PUMA-to-metro allocation was authorized.

Race, ethnicity, and ancestry

Race, Hispanic or Latino origin, ancestry, country of birth, citizenship, and language remain separate concepts. These are aggregate estimates.

Race distribution

Asian Alone20.6%
Estimate 8,350 ± 1,076; unweighted sample 383.
Black Alone2.3%
Estimate 933 ± 422; unweighted sample 29.
Nhpi AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 1; public estimate withheld.
Some Other Race AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 14; public estimate withheld.
Two Or More Races5.6%
Estimate 2,260 ± 488; unweighted sample 87.
White Alone70.6%
Estimate 28,634 ± 2,402; unweighted sample 1097.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Hispanic or Latino origin

Hispanic Or Latino1.0%
Estimate 418 ± 205; unweighted sample 22.
Not Hispanic Or Latino99.0%
Estimate 40,128 ± 2,975; unweighted sample 1589.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Ancestry composition is not published because the available country crosswalk is pending research deterministic validation. Hispanic or Latino origin is not treated as race.

Age, households, and economic structure

Age

18 To 3422.1%
Estimate 8,971 ± 1,317; unweighted sample 344.
35 To 4938.1%
Estimate 15,458 ± 1,900; unweighted sample 577.
50 To 6425.5%
Estimate 10,358 ± 1,143; unweighted sample 455.
65 And Over2.2%
Estimate 892 ± 262; unweighted sample 51.
Under 1812.0%
Estimate 4,867 ± 910; unweighted sample 184.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Sex as reported by the source

Female43.8%
Estimate 17,745 ± 1,674; unweighted sample 732.
Male56.2%
Estimate 22,801 ± 1,849; unweighted sample 879.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Nativity and citizenship

Born Abroad Of Us Parent11.4%
Estimate 4,615 ± 881; unweighted sample 179.
Naturalized Us Citizen57.5%
Estimate 23,310 ± 2,115; unweighted sample 961.
Not Us Citizen31.1%
Estimate 12,621 ± 1,695; unweighted sample 471.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Period of entry

2010 To 201932.4%
Estimate 13,133 ± 1,698; unweighted sample 477.
2020 Or Later10.2%
Estimate 4,146 ± 906; unweighted sample 161.
Before 201057.4%
Estimate 23,267 ± 2,144; unweighted sample 973.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Age at migration

18 To 3443.2%
Estimate 17,504 ± 1,937; unweighted sample 676.
35 To 496.9%
Estimate 2,793 ± 455; unweighted sample 127.
50 And Over1.6%
Estimate 630 ± 239; unweighted sample 24.
Under 1848.4%
Estimate 19,619 ± 1,981; unweighted sample 784.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Language and English proficiency

English Only25.4%
Estimate 10,121 ± 1,336; unweighted sample 401.
Not At AllSuppressed
Unweighted sample 4; public estimate withheld.
Not Well3.3%
Estimate 1,324 ± 406; unweighted sample 50.
Very Well56.1%
Estimate 22,366 ± 1,978; unweighted sample 917.
Well14.9%
Estimate 5,930 ± 992; unweighted sample 217.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Household size

Five Or More People24.7%
Estimate 7,962 ± 1,122; unweighted sample 303.
One Person14.9%
Estimate 4,804 ± 819; unweighted sample 159.
Three Or Four People42.0%
Estimate 13,524 ± 1,399; unweighted sample 571.
Two People18.4%
Estimate 5,947 ± 853; unweighted sample 256.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Household type

Family Household80.4%
Estimate 25,911 ± 2,056; unweighted sample 1061.
Nonfamily Household19.6%
Estimate 6,326 ± 925; unweighted sample 228.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Multigenerational household

Multigenerational7.9%
Estimate 2,535 ± 559; unweighted sample 97.
Not Multigenerational92.1%
Estimate 29,702 ± 2,212; unweighted sample 1192.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Households with children

Children Present49.5%
Estimate 15,959 ± 1,581; unweighted sample 619.
No Children Present50.5%
Estimate 16,278 ± 1,399; unweighted sample 670.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Education

Bachelors35.8%
Estimate 11,164 ± 1,309; unweighted sample 444.
Graduate Or Professional25.7%
Estimate 8,023 ± 940; unweighted sample 377.
High School Or Equivalent14.0%
Estimate 4,362 ± 889; unweighted sample 163.
Less Than High School4.7%
Estimate 1,469 ± 428; unweighted sample 57.
Some College Or Associate19.7%
Estimate 6,147 ± 959; unweighted sample 232.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Employment

Armed ForcesSuppressed
Unweighted sample 7; public estimate withheld.
Employed65.3%
Estimate 23,604 ± 2,052; unweighted sample 953.
Not In Labor Force30.1%
Estimate 10,869 ± 1,321; unweighted sample 430.
Unemployed4.1%
Estimate 1,487 ± 419; unweighted sample 59.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Occupation

Management Business Science Arts56.6%
Estimate 15,738 ± 1,484; unweighted sample 678.
Military SpecificSuppressed
Unweighted sample 4; public estimate withheld.
Natural Resources Construction Maintenance3.8%
Estimate 1,059 ± 296; unweighted sample 42.
Production Transportation Material Moving9.8%
Estimate 2,713 ± 501; unweighted sample 95.
Sales And Office19.4%
Estimate 5,389 ± 940; unweighted sample 213.
Service10.0%
Estimate 2,767 ± 524; unweighted sample 109.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Industry

Arts Entertainment Hospitality6.4%
Estimate 1,767 ± 613; unweighted sample 69.
Construction5.2%
Estimate 1,426 ± 414; unweighted sample 56.
Education Health Social Services22.7%
Estimate 6,236 ± 823; unweighted sample 283.
Finance Insurance Real Estate7.7%
Estimate 2,122 ± 478; unweighted sample 96.
Information2.8%
Estimate 776 ± 279; unweighted sample 31.
Manufacturing8.3%
Estimate 2,289 ± 512; unweighted sample 96.
MilitarySuppressed
Unweighted sample 7; public estimate withheld.
Other Services3.7%
Estimate 1,007 ± 278; unweighted sample 42.
Professional Administrative15.7%
Estimate 4,314 ± 774; unweighted sample 183.
Public Administration4.1%
Estimate 1,140 ± 371; unweighted sample 41.
Retail Trade14.2%
Estimate 3,903 ± 812; unweighted sample 136.
Transportation Utilities6.9%
Estimate 1,892 ± 555; unweighted sample 64.
Wholesale Trade1.7%
Estimate 464 ± 211; unweighted sample 21.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Personal income

100000 Or More25.2%
Estimate 9,206 ± 1,129; unweighted sample 402.
1 To 2499919.3%
Estimate 7,073 ± 930; unweighted sample 298.
25000 To 4999917.8%
Estimate 6,499 ± 989; unweighted sample 229.
50000 To 9999916.9%
Estimate 6,183 ± 725; unweighted sample 261.
Zero Or Negative20.9%
Estimate 7,643 ± 1,253; unweighted sample 275.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Poverty

100 To 199 Percent15.8%
Estimate 6,359 ± 1,421; unweighted sample 228.
200 To 399 Percent20.8%
Estimate 8,401 ± 1,167; unweighted sample 325.
400 Percent Or More46.2%
Estimate 18,650 ± 1,482; unweighted sample 815.
Below 100 Percent17.2%
Estimate 6,956 ± 1,166; unweighted sample 230.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Health insurance

Covered89.5%
Estimate 36,300 ± 2,650; unweighted sample 1462.
Not Covered10.5%
Estimate 4,246 ± 923; unweighted sample 149.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Disability

With Disability5.5%
Estimate 2,232 ± 501; unweighted sample 100.
Without Disability94.5%
Estimate 38,314 ± 2,855; unweighted sample 1511.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Housing tenure

Occupied Without Cash RentSuppressed
Unweighted sample 9; public estimate withheld.
Owned Free And Clear16.2%
Estimate 5,215 ± 728; unweighted sample 251.
Owned With Mortgage44.4%
Estimate 14,301 ± 1,453; unweighted sample 576.
Rented39.0%
Estimate 12,559 ± 1,336; unweighted sample 453.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Housing-cost burden

30 To 49 Percent25.2%
Estimate 2,901 ± 573; unweighted sample 93.
50 Percent Or More35.4%
Estimate 4,076 ± 765; unweighted sample 135.
Under 30 Percent39.4%
Estimate 4,538 ± 577; unweighted sample 199.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: moderate.

Residential tenure length

Established Residence25.0%
Estimate 8,063 ± 1,010; unweighted sample 367.
Mid Term Residence45.1%
Estimate 14,532 ± 1,353; unweighted sample 564.
Recent Move29.9%
Estimate 9,642 ± 1,182; unweighted sample 358.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Residential mobility

Arrived From Outside Us4.7%
Estimate 1,885 ± 574; unweighted sample 69.
Different House In Us13.0%
Estimate 5,254 ± 958; unweighted sample 188.
Same House82.3%
Estimate 33,205 ± 2,462; unweighted sample 1351.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

How this community differs across states

Highest community presence

  1. California/CA — 7,070
  2. Texas/TX — 5,670
  3. Florida/FL — 3,182
  4. Illinois/IL — 2,241
  5. New York/NY — 2,124
  6. Ohio/OH — 1,379
  7. Virginia/VA — 1,355
  8. New Jersey/NJ — 1,326
  9. Michigan/MI — 1,278
  10. Massachusetts/MA — 1,164

Highest location quotient

  1. Texas/TX — 1.55
  2. California/CA — 1.49
  3. Illinois/IL — 1.46
  4. Massachusetts/MA — 1.36
  5. Virginia/VA — 1.29
  6. Arizona/AZ — 1.18
  7. Florida/FL — 1.17
  8. New Jersey/NJ — 1.17
  9. Maryland/MD — 1.07
  10. Michigan/MI — 1.05

Closest surrounding demographic contexts

  1. Alaska/AK — 91.5%
  2. Vermont/VT — 91.3%
  3. North Dakota/ND — 91.2%
  4. Montana/MT — 91.2%
  5. South Dakota/SD — 91.0%
  6. Maine/ME — 91.0%
  7. Virginia/VA — 90.7%
  8. Missouri/MO — 90.7%
  9. Minnesota/MN — 90.6%
  10. Ohio/OH — 90.4%

Highest presence and closest surrounding context answer different questions and are never substituted for one another.

How this community compares with the United States

State-context comparisons use the same source period and composition schema. National community averages should not be treated as characteristics of any person.

The U.S.–Kuwait community contains materially different racial, ethnic, generational, linguistic, geographic, household, and socioeconomic profiles. National averages should not be treated as characteristics of every person.

Closest demographic peers

Peer rankings use population and settlement, migration, race and ethnicity, age and household, education and economic structure, language, and housing as separately disclosed dimensions.

Closest demographic peer 1

U.S.–Jordan community

93.1% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 93.1% · without: 91.8% · rank change: 0.

Strongest similarities: Housing and mobility, Migration, nativity, and generation, Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable)

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Education, work, and income, Age and household

View dimension scores
Age and household
96.8%
Education, work, and income
93.1%
Housing and mobility
98.1%
Migration, nativity, and generation
98.0%
Population and settlement
83.0%
Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable)
97.8%
Population scale
86.9%
Settlement concentration
96.0%
State footprint
66.2%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Closest demographic peer 2

U.S.–New Zealand community

92.0% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 92.0% · without: 89.9% · rank change: 12.

Strongest similarities: Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable), Education, work, and income, Age and household

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Housing and mobility, Migration, nativity, and generation

View dimension scores
Age and household
92.2%
Education, work, and income
92.3%
Housing and mobility
90.0%
Migration, nativity, and generation
91.4%
Population and settlement
86.7%
Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable)
99.6%
Population scale
99.8%
Settlement concentration
95.3%
State footprint
65.0%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Closest demographic peer 3

U.S.–Singapore community

91.9% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 91.9% · without: 90.1% · rank change: 6.

Strongest similarities: Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable), Housing and mobility, Education, work, and income

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Age and household, Migration, nativity, and generation

View dimension scores
Age and household
90.9%
Education, work, and income
92.1%
Housing and mobility
92.3%
Migration, nativity, and generation
91.4%
Population and settlement
86.9%
Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable)
98.8%
Population scale
98.2%
Settlement concentration
94.0%
State footprint
68.5%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Largest measured differences

The comparison asset reports the lowest demographic structural similarities without describing communities as enemies, opposites, incompatible groups, or unlikely allies.

  1. U.S.–Mexico community — 58.8% measured structural similarity
  2. U.S.–Cuba community — 59.8% measured structural similarity
  3. U.S.–Dominican Republic community — 62.2% measured structural similarity

Explore peers in Ally Finder

Data quality

Profile state
eligible_high_reliability
Reliable dimensions
18
Observed basis
Country of birth in the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year PUMS

Suppressed cells remain labeled. Missing values and shared zeroes do not create similarity.

What should not be inferred

Aggregate demographic similarity does not establish agreement, alliance, representation, consent, endorsement, political behavior, nationality, dual citizenship, religion, caste, tribe, sect, or individual identity.

How the comparison was calculated

Dimension-specific categorical distributions use square-root Jensen–Shannon distance; ordered distributions use bounded Wasserstein distance; population totals use log-scaled distance; and state footprints use Jensen–Shannon distance. Available reliable dimensions are combined with versioned weights. KNN is a retrieval method, not a public claim about alliance.

Weights · Sources · Data quality