WS MUSINGSWORLD SYSTEMS MUSINGS · INTERSECTIONALITY FINDER

U.S. bi-national and heritage community · eligible high reliability

U.S.–Paraguay community

A country-specific aggregate research profile. It does not identify dual citizens and should not be treated as a description of every person.

What this record observesForeign birth: true · reported ancestry: false · citizenship status available: true · confirmed dual citizenship: false.

Community at a glance

Observed country-of-birth population23,926Margin of error ± 1,893
Foreign-born estimate21,735Margin of error ± 1,936
Unweighted sample1,022Reliability: high
Citizenship compositionNaturalized Us Citizen 53.5% · Not Us Citizen 37.4%Status in the aggregate cohort, not loyalty or civic commitment
Ancestry-linked estimateNot availableCrosswalk remains under governance review
Leading statesNew York, Florida, New JerseyPresence, not demographic resemblance
Leading metrosNot availableNo research PUMA-to-metro allocation
Source period2020–2024ACS 5-year PUMS

Where this community lives

State count and share view. Location quotient and state-relative fields are available in the underlying state-profile asset.

New York/NY4,173 · 17.4%
Florida/FL3,605 · 15.1%
New Jersey/NJ2,815 · 11.8%
California/CA1,566 · 6.5%
Virginia/VA1,380 · 5.8%
Texas/TX1,280 · 5.3%
Maryland/MD964 · 4.0%
Pennsylvania/PA762 · 3.2%
Georgia/GA534 · 2.2%
Accessible state presence table
StateEstimateShare of communityLocation quotientReliability
New York/NY4,17317.4%2.942458limited
Florida/FL3,60515.1%2.25123limited
New Jersey/NJ2,81511.8%4.217243limited
California/CA1,5666.5%0.557973limited
Virginia/VA1,3805.8%2.219096limited
Texas/TX1,2805.3%0.593531limited
Maryland/MD9644.0%2.174396limited
Pennsylvania/PA7623.2%0.819339limited
Georgia/GA5342.2%0.683254suppressed

Metropolitan profiles are withheld in this run because PUMS does not identify metropolitan areas and no research PUMA-to-metro allocation was authorized.

Race, ethnicity, and ancestry

Race, Hispanic or Latino origin, ancestry, country of birth, citizenship, and language remain separate concepts. These are aggregate estimates.

Race distribution

Aian AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 21; public estimate withheld.
Asian Alone3.2%
Estimate 760 ± 273; unweighted sample 37.
Black AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 1; public estimate withheld.
Nhpi AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 1; public estimate withheld.
Some Other Race Alone28.2%
Estimate 6,753 ± 1,134; unweighted sample 270.
Two Or More Races44.2%
Estimate 10,578 ± 1,395; unweighted sample 405.
White Alone22.5%
Estimate 5,394 ± 860; unweighted sample 287.
Other Or Suppressed1.8%
Estimate 441 ± Not enough reliable data; unweighted sample 23.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Hispanic or Latino origin

Hispanic Or Latino89.8%
Estimate 21,494 ± 1,854; unweighted sample 884.
Not Hispanic Or Latino10.2%
Estimate 2,432 ± 520; unweighted sample 138.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Ancestry composition is not published because the available country crosswalk is pending research deterministic validation. Hispanic or Latino origin is not treated as race.

Age, households, and economic structure

Age

18 To 3430.7%
Estimate 7,340 ± 894; unweighted sample 322.
35 To 4929.4%
Estimate 7,030 ± 1,067; unweighted sample 270.
50 To 6421.7%
Estimate 5,181 ± 851; unweighted sample 210.
65 And Over13.1%
Estimate 3,132 ± 604; unweighted sample 173.
Under 185.2%
Estimate 1,243 ± 455; unweighted sample 47.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Sex as reported by the source

Female54.2%
Estimate 12,956 ± 1,188; unweighted sample 582.
Male45.8%
Estimate 10,970 ± 1,246; unweighted sample 440.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Nativity and citizenship

Born Abroad Of Us Parent9.2%
Estimate 2,191 ± 504; unweighted sample 104.
Naturalized Us Citizen53.5%
Estimate 12,790 ± 1,680; unweighted sample 533.
Not Us Citizen37.4%
Estimate 8,945 ± 1,052; unweighted sample 385.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Period of entry

2010 To 201920.3%
Estimate 4,846 ± 841; unweighted sample 206.
2020 Or Later9.4%
Estimate 2,245 ± 648; unweighted sample 98.
Before 201070.4%
Estimate 16,835 ± 1,661; unweighted sample 718.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Age at migration

18 To 3441.5%
Estimate 9,921 ± 1,173; unweighted sample 454.
35 To 499.8%
Estimate 2,350 ± 516; unweighted sample 93.
50 And Over2.0%
Estimate 477 ± 210; unweighted sample 28.
Under 1846.7%
Estimate 11,178 ± 1,365; unweighted sample 447.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Language and English proficiency

English Only19.5%
Estimate 4,644 ± 759; unweighted sample 221.
Not At All3.7%
Estimate 890 ± 295; unweighted sample 27.
Not Well9.9%
Estimate 2,352 ± 479; unweighted sample 99.
Very Well47.7%
Estimate 11,345 ± 1,563; unweighted sample 458.
Well19.1%
Estimate 4,551 ± 797; unweighted sample 211.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Household size

Five Or More People18.1%
Estimate 3,209 ± 691; unweighted sample 113.
One Person13.7%
Estimate 2,421 ± 549; unweighted sample 88.
Three Or Four People40.6%
Estimate 7,179 ± 909; unweighted sample 301.
Two People27.6%
Estimate 4,875 ± 753; unweighted sample 223.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Household type

Family Household78.2%
Estimate 13,836 ± 1,276; unweighted sample 588.
Nonfamily Household21.8%
Estimate 3,848 ± 746; unweighted sample 137.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Multigenerational household

Multigenerational5.3%
Estimate 937 ± 300; unweighted sample 40.
Not Multigenerational94.7%
Estimate 16,747 ± 1,442; unweighted sample 685.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Households with children

Children Present35.4%
Estimate 6,258 ± 884; unweighted sample 235.
No Children Present64.6%
Estimate 11,426 ± 1,139; unweighted sample 490.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Education

Bachelors24.6%
Estimate 5,246 ± 924; unweighted sample 194.
Graduate Or Professional15.5%
Estimate 3,297 ± 611; unweighted sample 151.
High School Or Equivalent21.9%
Estimate 4,680 ± 706; unweighted sample 209.
Less Than High School12.5%
Estimate 2,663 ± 629; unweighted sample 121.
Some College Or Associate25.5%
Estimate 5,445 ± 888; unweighted sample 205.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Employment

Armed ForcesSuppressed
Unweighted sample 4; public estimate withheld.
Employed69.8%
Estimate 15,917 ± 1,481; unweighted sample 645.
Not In Labor Force25.2%
Estimate 5,745 ± 778; unweighted sample 288.
Unemployed4.8%
Estimate 1,099 ± 437; unweighted sample 45.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Occupation

Management Business Science Arts40.5%
Estimate 7,763 ± 976; unweighted sample 323.
Military SpecificSuppressed
Unweighted sample 2; public estimate withheld.
Natural Resources Construction Maintenance7.1%
Estimate 1,371 ± 358; unweighted sample 65.
Production Transportation Material Moving8.9%
Estimate 1,704 ± 472; unweighted sample 75.
Sales And Office16.3%
Estimate 3,137 ± 629; unweighted sample 135.
Service27.0%
Estimate 5,180 ± 910; unweighted sample 188.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Industry

Agriculture Forestry Fishing MiningSuppressed
Unweighted sample 8; public estimate withheld.
Arts Entertainment Hospitality10.2%
Estimate 1,929 ± 400; unweighted sample 83.
Construction7.7%
Estimate 1,467 ± 377; unweighted sample 63.
Education Health Social Services23.3%
Estimate 4,417 ± 771; unweighted sample 197.
Finance Insurance Real Estate5.1%
Estimate 968 ± 340; unweighted sample 43.
InformationSuppressed
Unweighted sample 11; public estimate withheld.
Manufacturing3.4%
Estimate 653 ± 245; unweighted sample 37.
MilitarySuppressed
Unweighted sample 5; public estimate withheld.
Other Services10.4%
Estimate 1,971 ± 648; unweighted sample 69.
Professional Administrative16.4%
Estimate 3,107 ± 739; unweighted sample 106.
Public Administration4.5%
Estimate 844 ± 315; unweighted sample 33.
Retail Trade9.4%
Estimate 1,776 ± 434; unweighted sample 77.
Transportation Utilities5.0%
Estimate 945 ± 340; unweighted sample 39.
Wholesale TradeSuppressed
Unweighted sample 9; public estimate withheld.
Other Or Suppressed4.7%
Estimate 886 ± Not enough reliable data; unweighted sample 33.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Personal income

100000 Or More12.5%
Estimate 2,854 ± 658; unweighted sample 124.
1 To 2499924.0%
Estimate 5,496 ± 699; unweighted sample 292.
25000 To 4999926.7%
Estimate 6,103 ± 893; unweighted sample 222.
50000 To 9999922.8%
Estimate 5,217 ± 944; unweighted sample 200.
Zero Or Negative14.1%
Estimate 3,230 ± 671; unweighted sample 148.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Poverty

100 To 199 Percent19.5%
Estimate 4,579 ± 849; unweighted sample 145.
200 To 399 Percent34.1%
Estimate 7,995 ± 1,468; unweighted sample 315.
400 Percent Or More38.1%
Estimate 8,934 ± 1,000; unweighted sample 407.
Below 100 Percent8.2%
Estimate 1,920 ± 498; unweighted sample 100.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Health insurance

Covered80.8%
Estimate 19,337 ± 1,712; unweighted sample 864.
Not Covered19.2%
Estimate 4,589 ± 736; unweighted sample 158.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Disability

With Disability8.2%
Estimate 1,950 ± 439; unweighted sample 97.
Without Disability91.8%
Estimate 21,976 ± 1,949; unweighted sample 925.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Housing tenure

Occupied Without Cash RentSuppressed
Unweighted sample 9; public estimate withheld.
Owned Free And Clear17.0%
Estimate 3,007 ± 490; unweighted sample 163.
Owned With Mortgage39.8%
Estimate 7,046 ± 821; unweighted sample 316.
Rented42.2%
Estimate 7,461 ± 1,112; unweighted sample 237.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Housing-cost burden

30 To 49 Percent23.5%
Estimate 1,701 ± 601; unweighted sample 50.
50 Percent Or More23.2%
Estimate 1,678 ± 487; unweighted sample 56.
Under 30 Percent53.4%
Estimate 3,866 ± 814; unweighted sample 126.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: moderate.

Residential tenure length

Established Residence33.2%
Estimate 5,872 ± 715; unweighted sample 272.
Mid Term Residence36.8%
Estimate 6,509 ± 887; unweighted sample 288.
Recent Move30.0%
Estimate 5,303 ± 1,020; unweighted sample 165.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Residential mobility

Arrived From Outside UsSuppressed
Unweighted sample 21; public estimate withheld.
Different House In Us13.5%
Estimate 3,230 ± 727; unweighted sample 137.
Same House84.6%
Estimate 20,248 ± 1,835; unweighted sample 864.
Other Or Suppressed1.9%
Estimate 448 ± Not enough reliable data; unweighted sample 21.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

How this community differs across states

Highest community presence

  1. New York/NY — 4,173
  2. Florida/FL — 3,605
  3. New Jersey/NJ — 2,815
  4. California/CA — 1,566
  5. Virginia/VA — 1,380
  6. Texas/TX — 1,280
  7. Maryland/MD — 964
  8. Pennsylvania/PA — 762
  9. Georgia/GA — 534

Highest location quotient

  1. New Jersey/NJ — 4.22
  2. New York/NY — 2.94
  3. Florida/FL — 2.25
  4. Virginia/VA — 2.22
  5. Maryland/MD — 2.17
  6. Pennsylvania/PA — 0.82
  7. Georgia/GA — 0.68
  8. Texas/TX — 0.59
  9. California/CA — 0.56

Closest surrounding demographic contexts

  1. California/CA — 84.3%
  2. Texas/TX — 84.2%
  3. Vermont/VT — 83.1%
  4. New Mexico/NM — 82.8%
  5. Nevada/NV — 82.0%
  6. Arizona/AZ — 82.0%
  7. Rhode Island/RI — 81.7%
  8. Florida/FL — 81.6%
  9. New Jersey/NJ — 80.4%
  10. New York/NY — 79.8%

Highest presence and closest surrounding context answer different questions and are never substituted for one another.

How this community compares with the United States

State-context comparisons use the same source period and composition schema. National community averages should not be treated as characteristics of any person.

The U.S.–Paraguay community contains materially different racial, ethnic, generational, linguistic, geographic, household, and socioeconomic profiles. National averages should not be treated as characteristics of every person.

Closest demographic peers

Peer rankings use population and settlement, migration, race and ethnicity, age and household, education and economic structure, language, and housing as separately disclosed dimensions.

Closest demographic peer 1

U.S.–Slovakia community

91.8% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 91.8% · without: 91.8% · rank change: 0.

Strongest similarities: Age and household, Migration, nativity, and generation, Housing and mobility

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Education, work, and income, Housing and mobility

View dimension scores
Age and household
95.8%
Education, work, and income
90.5%
Housing and mobility
92.8%
Migration, nativity, and generation
94.5%
Population and settlement
89.0%
Population scale
97.5%
Settlement concentration
97.3%
State footprint
72.4%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Closest demographic peer 2

U.S.–Costa Rica community

89.8% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 89.8% · without: 89.3% · rank change: 2.

Strongest similarities: Age and household, Migration, nativity, and generation, Education, work, and income

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable), Housing and mobility

View dimension scores
Age and household
97.8%
Education, work, and income
96.7%
Housing and mobility
93.2%
Language
93.9%
Migration, nativity, and generation
97.7%
Population and settlement
74.1%
Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable)
92.0%
Population scale
77.5%
Settlement concentration
93.5%
State footprint
51.2%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Closest demographic peer 3

U.S.–Ivory Coast community

89.6% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 89.6% · without: 89.6% · rank change: -1.

Strongest similarities: Age and household, Migration, nativity, and generation, Education, work, and income

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Housing and mobility, Education, work, and income

View dimension scores
Age and household
94.9%
Education, work, and income
92.7%
Housing and mobility
89.7%
Migration, nativity, and generation
94.6%
Population and settlement
82.5%
Population scale
95.0%
Settlement concentration
96.4%
State footprint
56.1%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Largest measured differences

The comparison asset reports the lowest demographic structural similarities without describing communities as enemies, opposites, incompatible groups, or unlikely allies.

  1. U.S.–India community — 62.7% measured structural similarity
  2. U.S.–Vietnam community — 63.4% measured structural similarity
  3. U.S.–Rwanda community — 63.7% measured structural similarity

Explore peers in Ally Finder

Data quality

Profile state
eligible_high_reliability
Reliable dimensions
21
Observed basis
Country of birth in the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year PUMS

Suppressed cells remain labeled. Missing values and shared zeroes do not create similarity.

What should not be inferred

Aggregate demographic similarity does not establish agreement, alliance, representation, consent, endorsement, political behavior, nationality, dual citizenship, religion, caste, tribe, sect, or individual identity.

How the comparison was calculated

Dimension-specific categorical distributions use square-root Jensen–Shannon distance; ordered distributions use bounded Wasserstein distance; population totals use log-scaled distance; and state footprints use Jensen–Shannon distance. Available reliable dimensions are combined with versioned weights. KNN is a retrieval method, not a public claim about alliance.

Weights · Sources · Data quality