U.S. bi-national and heritage community · eligible high reliability

U.S.–Lithuania community

A country-specific aggregate research profile. It does not identify dual citizens and should not be treated as a description of every person.

What this record observesForeign birth: true · reported ancestry: false · citizenship status available: true · confirmed dual citizenship: false.

Community at a glance

Observed country-of-birth population36,818Margin of error ± 2,583

Foreign-born estimate34,942Margin of error ± 2,554

Unweighted sample1,620Reliability: high

Citizenship compositionNaturalized Us Citizen 59.6% · Not Us Citizen 35.3%Status in the aggregate cohort, not loyalty or civic commitment

Ancestry-linked estimateNot availableCrosswalk remains under governance review

Leading statesIllinois, Florida, CaliforniaPresence, not demographic resemblance

Leading metrosNot availableNo research PUMA-to-metro allocation

Source period2020–2024ACS 5-year PUMS

Where this community lives

State count and share view. Location quotient and state-relative fields are available in the underlying state-profile asset.

Illinois/IL

11,800 · 32.0%

Florida/FL

3,733 · 10.1%

California/CA

3,528 · 9.6%

New York/NY

3,505 · 9.5%

New Jersey/NJ

1,532 · 4.2%

Texas/TX

1,310 · 3.6%

Massachusetts/MA

1,151 · 3.1%

Pennsylvania/PA

1,148 · 3.1%

Maryland/MD

971 · 2.6%

Connecticut/CT

738 · 2.0%

Accessible state presence table
State	Estimate	Share of community	Location quotient	Reliability
Illinois/IL	11,800	32.0%	8.455521	moderate
Florida/FL	3,733	10.1%	1.514895	limited
California/CA	3,528	9.6%	0.816883	limited
New York/NY	3,505	9.5%	1.606053	limited
New Jersey/NJ	1,532	4.2%	1.491485	limited
Texas/TX	1,310	3.6%	0.394744	limited
Massachusetts/MA	1,151	3.1%	1.486403	limited
Pennsylvania/PA	1,148	3.1%	0.802159	limited
Maryland/MD	971	2.6%	1.423282	limited
Connecticut/CT	738	2.0%	1.852215	limited

Metropolitan profiles are withheld in this run because PUMS does not identify metropolitan areas and no research PUMA-to-metro allocation was authorized.

Race, ethnicity, and ancestry

Race, Hispanic or Latino origin, ancestry, country of birth, citizenship, and language remain separate concepts. These are aggregate estimates.

Race distribution

Asian AloneSuppressed

Unweighted sample 2; public estimate withheld.

Some Other Race AloneSuppressed

Unweighted sample 4; public estimate withheld.

Two Or More RacesSuppressed

Unweighted sample 11; public estimate withheld.

White Alone99.3%

Estimate 36,545 ± 2,565; unweighted sample 1603.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Hispanic or Latino origin

Hispanic Or LatinoSuppressed

Unweighted sample 4; public estimate withheld.

Not Hispanic Or Latino99.7%

Estimate 36,721 ± 2,576; unweighted sample 1616.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Ancestry composition is not published because the available country crosswalk is pending research deterministic validation. Hispanic or Latino origin is not treated as race.

Age, households, and economic structure

Age

18 To 3418.0%

Estimate 6,609 ± 863; unweighted sample 264.

35 To 4933.7%

Estimate 12,396 ± 1,479; unweighted sample 520.

50 To 6423.1%

Estimate 8,506 ± 1,264; unweighted sample 360.

65 And Over20.8%

Estimate 7,661 ± 1,036; unweighted sample 413.

Under 184.5%

Estimate 1,646 ± 531; unweighted sample 63.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Sex as reported by the source

Female57.6%

Estimate 21,214 ± 1,705; unweighted sample 957.

Male42.4%

Estimate 15,604 ± 1,404; unweighted sample 663.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Nativity and citizenship

Born Abroad Of Us Parent5.1%

Estimate 1,876 ± 549; unweighted sample 79.

Naturalized Us Citizen59.6%

Estimate 21,954 ± 1,959; unweighted sample 1050.

Not Us Citizen35.3%

Estimate 12,988 ± 1,411; unweighted sample 491.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Period of entry

2010 To 201922.9%

Estimate 8,446 ± 1,135; unweighted sample 293.

2020 Or Later4.5%

Estimate 1,670 ± 515; unweighted sample 69.

Before 201072.5%

Estimate 26,702 ± 2,117; unweighted sample 1258.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Age at migration

18 To 3447.0%

Estimate 17,321 ± 1,799; unweighted sample 757.

35 To 4913.2%

Estimate 4,878 ± 765; unweighted sample 222.

50 And Over4.6%

Estimate 1,680 ± 527; unweighted sample 65.

Under 1835.1%

Estimate 12,939 ± 1,249; unweighted sample 576.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Language and English proficiency

English Only21.1%

Estimate 7,680 ± 1,013; unweighted sample 363.

Not At AllSuppressed

Unweighted sample 17; public estimate withheld.

Not Well7.1%

Estimate 2,605 ± 592; unweighted sample 107.

Very Well48.6%

Estimate 17,702 ± 1,497; unweighted sample 800.

Well22.2%

Estimate 8,111 ± 1,224; unweighted sample 324.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Household size

Five Or More People8.3%

Estimate 2,267 ± 515; unweighted sample 91.

One Person20.6%

Estimate 5,628 ± 937; unweighted sample 236.

Three Or Four People34.7%

Estimate 9,461 ± 924; unweighted sample 426.

Two People36.4%

Estimate 9,913 ± 1,090; unweighted sample 458.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Household type

Family Household73.7%

Estimate 20,096 ± 1,410; unweighted sample 904.

Nonfamily Household26.3%

Estimate 7,173 ± 1,049; unweighted sample 307.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Multigenerational household

Multigenerational3.8%

Estimate 1,046 ± 321; unweighted sample 52.

Not Multigenerational96.2%

Estimate 26,223 ± 1,882; unweighted sample 1159.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Households with children

Children Present31.6%

Estimate 8,618 ± 986; unweighted sample 368.

No Children Present68.4%

Estimate 18,651 ± 1,792; unweighted sample 843.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Education

Bachelors33.8%

Estimate 11,320 ± 1,331; unweighted sample 498.

Graduate Or Professional24.3%

Estimate 8,133 ± 954; unweighted sample 370.

High School Or Equivalent13.7%

Estimate 4,596 ± 694; unweighted sample 210.

Less Than High School3.9%

Estimate 1,296 ± 317; unweighted sample 67.

Some College Or Associate24.2%

Estimate 8,113 ± 1,140; unweighted sample 346.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Employment

Armed ForcesSuppressed

Unweighted sample 2; public estimate withheld.

Employed64.3%

Estimate 22,793 ± 1,889; unweighted sample 965.

Not In Labor Force33.7%

Estimate 11,959 ± 1,168; unweighted sample 563.

Unemployed1.8%

Estimate 650 ± 237; unweighted sample 37.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Occupation

Management Business Science Arts48.7%

Estimate 13,385 ± 1,327; unweighted sample 584.

Military SpecificSuppressed

Unweighted sample 2; public estimate withheld.

Natural Resources Construction Maintenance7.9%

Estimate 2,170 ± 523; unweighted sample 76.

Production Transportation Material Moving9.9%

Estimate 2,723 ± 602; unweighted sample 126.

Sales And Office15.1%

Estimate 4,147 ± 825; unweighted sample 173.

Service18.2%

Estimate 5,014 ± 855; unweighted sample 206.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Industry

Agriculture Forestry Fishing MiningSuppressed

Unweighted sample 4; public estimate withheld.

Arts Entertainment Hospitality8.9%

Estimate 2,426 ± 696; unweighted sample 89.

Construction7.1%

Estimate 1,944 ± 513; unweighted sample 71.

Education Health Social Services22.6%

Estimate 6,180 ± 924; unweighted sample 294.

Finance Insurance Real Estate6.0%

Estimate 1,642 ± 451; unweighted sample 63.

InformationSuppressed

Unweighted sample 14; public estimate withheld.

Manufacturing6.5%

Estimate 1,763 ± 434; unweighted sample 90.

MilitarySuppressed

Unweighted sample 2; public estimate withheld.

Other Services6.7%

Estimate 1,839 ± 485; unweighted sample 82.

Professional Administrative17.2%

Estimate 4,698 ± 886; unweighted sample 174.

Public Administration2.7%

Estimate 727 ± 243; unweighted sample 33.

Retail Trade8.3%

Estimate 2,263 ± 466; unweighted sample 105.

Transportation Utilities9.7%

Estimate 2,643 ± 708; unweighted sample 107.

Wholesale Trade2.5%

Estimate 675 ± 334; unweighted sample 29.

Other Or Suppressed1.9%

Estimate 522 ± Not enough reliable data; unweighted sample 20.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Personal income

100000 Or More17.9%

Estimate 6,370 ± 876; unweighted sample 285.

1 To 2499924.8%

Estimate 8,823 ± 1,109; unweighted sample 414.

25000 To 4999920.9%

Estimate 7,429 ± 1,078; unweighted sample 325.

50000 To 9999926.2%

Estimate 9,314 ± 1,083; unweighted sample 400.

Zero Or Negative10.1%

Estimate 3,588 ± 628; unweighted sample 147.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Poverty

100 To 199 Percent13.1%

Estimate 4,783 ± 1,016; unweighted sample 219.

200 To 399 Percent26.3%

Estimate 9,612 ± 1,475; unweighted sample 391.

400 Percent Or More52.5%

Estimate 19,207 ± 1,931; unweighted sample 861.

Below 100 Percent8.2%

Estimate 2,993 ± 651; unweighted sample 124.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Health insurance

Covered87.9%

Estimate 32,357 ± 2,275; unweighted sample 1478.

Not Covered12.1%

Estimate 4,461 ± 1,004; unweighted sample 142.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Disability

With Disability10.8%

Estimate 3,965 ± 689; unweighted sample 216.

Without Disability89.2%

Estimate 32,853 ± 2,405; unweighted sample 1404.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Housing tenure

Occupied Without Cash RentSuppressed

Unweighted sample 14; public estimate withheld.

Owned Free And Clear26.1%

Estimate 7,114 ± 808; unweighted sample 378.

Owned With Mortgage44.1%

Estimate 12,017 ± 1,194; unweighted sample 529.

Rented28.5%

Estimate 7,760 ± 1,085; unweighted sample 290.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Housing-cost burden

30 To 49 Percent18.2%

Estimate 1,393 ± 405; unweighted sample 56.

50 Percent Or More28.7%

Estimate 2,195 ± 601; unweighted sample 73.

Under 30 Percent53.0%

Estimate 4,052 ± 692; unweighted sample 157.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: moderate.

Residential tenure length

Established Residence40.7%

Estimate 11,095 ± 1,167; unweighted sample 560.

Mid Term Residence39.3%

Estimate 10,707 ± 1,212; unweighted sample 445.

Recent Move20.0%

Estimate 5,467 ± 1,010; unweighted sample 206.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Residential mobility

Arrived From Outside UsSuppressed

Unweighted sample 32; public estimate withheld.

Different House In Us8.7%

Estimate 3,182 ± 667; unweighted sample 146.

Same House88.9%

Estimate 32,698 ± 2,528; unweighted sample 1440.

Other Or Suppressed2.4%

Estimate 888 ± Not enough reliable data; unweighted sample 32.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

How this community differs across states

Highest community presence

Illinois/IL — 11,800
Florida/FL — 3,733
California/CA — 3,528
New York/NY — 3,505
New Jersey/NJ — 1,532
Texas/TX — 1,310
Massachusetts/MA — 1,151
Pennsylvania/PA — 1,148
Maryland/MD — 971
Connecticut/CT — 738

Highest location quotient

Illinois/IL — 8.46
Connecticut/CT — 1.85
New York/NY — 1.61
Florida/FL — 1.51
New Jersey/NJ — 1.49
Massachusetts/MA — 1.49
Maryland/MD — 1.42
Nevada/NV — 0.98
Colorado/CO — 0.87
California/CA — 0.82

Closest surrounding demographic contexts

Colorado/CO — 94.6%
New Jersey/NJ — 94.4%
Maryland/MD — 94.3%
Connecticut/CT — 94.0%
Virginia/VA — 93.8%
New Hampshire/NH — 93.7%
Washington/WA — 93.4%
Massachusetts/MA — 93.4%
Minnesota/MN — 93.3%
Delaware/DE — 93.2%

Highest presence and closest surrounding context answer different questions and are never substituted for one another.

How this community compares with the United States

State-context comparisons use the same source period and composition schema. National community averages should not be treated as characteristics of any person.

The U.S.–Lithuania community contains materially different racial, ethnic, generational, linguistic, geographic, household, and socioeconomic profiles. National averages should not be treated as characteristics of every person.

Closest demographic peers

Peer rankings use population and settlement, migration, race and ethnicity, age and household, education and economic structure, language, and housing as separately disclosed dimensions.

Closest demographic peer 1

U.S.–Serbia community

91.5% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 91.5% · without: 91.5% · rank change: 0.

Strongest similarities: Age and household, Migration, nativity, and generation, Education, work, and income

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Housing and mobility, Education, work, and income

View dimension scores

Age and household: 97.6%
Education, work, and income: 94.7%
Housing and mobility: 91.1%
Migration, nativity, and generation: 97.0%
Population and settlement: 84.0%
Population scale: 97.4%
Settlement concentration: 88.1%
State footprint: 66.4%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Closest demographic peer 2

U.S.–Slovakia community

91.3% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 91.3% · without: 91.3% · rank change: 0.

Strongest similarities: Housing and mobility, Migration, nativity, and generation, Age and household

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Education, work, and income, Age and household

View dimension scores

Age and household: 97.2%
Education, work, and income: 94.3%
Housing and mobility: 98.5%
Migration, nativity, and generation: 97.2%
Population and settlement: 80.7%
Population scale: 91.2%
Settlement concentration: 88.3%
State footprint: 62.5%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Closest demographic peer 3

U.S.–Czechia community

90.3% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 90.3% · without: 90.3% · rank change: 0.

Strongest similarities: Age and household, Migration, nativity, and generation, Education, work, and income

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Housing and mobility, Education, work, and income

View dimension scores

Age and household: 97.5%
Education, work, and income: 94.2%
Housing and mobility: 92.6%
Migration, nativity, and generation: 96.8%
Population and settlement: 80.3%
Population scale: 97.2%
Settlement concentration: 89.5%
State footprint: 54.1%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Largest measured differences

The comparison asset reports the lowest demographic structural similarities without describing communities as enemies, opposites, incompatible groups, or unlikely allies.

U.S.–Mexico community — 72.9% measured structural similarity
U.S.–Honduras community — 73.0% measured structural similarity
U.S.–Guatemala community — 74.0% measured structural similarity

Explore peers in Ally Finder

Data quality

Profile state: eligible_high_reliability
Reliable dimensions: 18
Observed basis: Country of birth in the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year PUMS

Suppressed cells remain labeled. Missing values and shared zeroes do not create similarity.

What should not be inferred

Aggregate demographic similarity does not establish agreement, alliance, representation, consent, endorsement, political behavior, nationality, dual citizenship, religion, caste, tribe, sect, or individual identity.

How the comparison was calculated

Dimension-specific categorical distributions use square-root Jensen–Shannon distance; ordered distributions use bounded Wasserstein distance; population totals use log-scaled distance; and state footprints use Jensen–Shannon distance. Available reliable dimensions are combined with versioned weights. KNN is a retrieval method, not a public claim about alliance.

Weights · Sources · Data quality