WS MUSINGSWORLD SYSTEMS MUSINGS · INTERSECTIONALITY FINDER

U.S. bi-national and heritage community · eligible high reliability

U.S.–Czechia community

A country-specific aggregate research profile. It does not identify dual citizens and should not be treated as a description of every person.

What this record observesForeign birth: true · reported ancestry: false · citizenship status available: true · confirmed dual citizenship: false.

Community at a glance

Observed country-of-birth population30,241Margin of error ± 1,923
Foreign-born estimate27,884Margin of error ± 1,781
Unweighted sample1,448Reliability: high
Citizenship compositionNaturalized Us Citizen 56.6% · Not Us Citizen 35.6%Status in the aggregate cohort, not loyalty or civic commitment
Ancestry-linked estimateNot availableCrosswalk remains under governance review
Leading statesCalifornia, Florida, New YorkPresence, not demographic resemblance
Leading metrosNot availableNo research PUMA-to-metro allocation
Source period2020–2024ACS 5-year PUMS

Where this community lives

State count and share view. Location quotient and state-relative fields are available in the underlying state-profile asset.

California/CA5,600 · 18.5%
Florida/FL3,868 · 12.8%
New York/NY2,942 · 9.7%
Illinois/IL1,931 · 6.4%
Arizona/AZ1,295 · 4.3%
Texas/TX1,245 · 4.1%
Colorado/CO1,189 · 3.9%
New Jersey/NJ1,187 · 3.9%
Washington/WA1,155 · 3.8%
Pennsylvania/PA1,073 · 3.5%
Accessible state presence table
StateEstimateShare of communityLocation quotientReliability
California/CA5,60018.5%1.57864moderate
Florida/FL3,86812.8%1.911063moderate
New York/NY2,9429.7%1.641264limited
Illinois/IL1,9316.4%1.68463limited
Arizona/AZ1,2954.3%1.943703limited
Texas/TX1,2454.1%0.456748limited
Colorado/CO1,1893.9%2.246313limited
New Jersey/NJ1,1873.9%1.406938limited
Washington/WA1,1553.8%1.636587limited
Pennsylvania/PA1,0733.5%0.912814limited

Metropolitan profiles are withheld in this run because PUMS does not identify metropolitan areas and no research PUMA-to-metro allocation was authorized.

Race, ethnicity, and ancestry

Race, Hispanic or Latino origin, ancestry, country of birth, citizenship, and language remain separate concepts. These are aggregate estimates.

Race distribution

Asian AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 7; public estimate withheld.
Black AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 6; public estimate withheld.
Some Other Race AloneSuppressed
Unweighted sample 8; public estimate withheld.
Two Or More RacesSuppressed
Unweighted sample 19; public estimate withheld.
White Alone96.3%
Estimate 29,114 ± 1,833; unweighted sample 1408.
Other Or Suppressed3.7%
Estimate 1,127 ± Not enough reliable data; unweighted sample 40.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Hispanic or Latino origin

Hispanic Or LatinoSuppressed
Unweighted sample 5; public estimate withheld.
Not Hispanic Or Latino99.7%
Estimate 30,158 ± 1,916; unweighted sample 1443.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Ancestry composition is not published because the available country crosswalk is pending research deterministic validation. Hispanic or Latino origin is not treated as race.

Age, households, and economic structure

Age

18 To 3417.6%
Estimate 5,308 ± 748; unweighted sample 210.
35 To 4936.1%
Estimate 10,907 ± 1,145; unweighted sample 481.
50 To 6421.4%
Estimate 6,458 ± 826; unweighted sample 321.
65 And Over19.9%
Estimate 6,033 ± 724; unweighted sample 367.
Under 185.1%
Estimate 1,535 ± 504; unweighted sample 69.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Sex as reported by the source

Female59.7%
Estimate 18,059 ± 1,240; unweighted sample 868.
Male40.3%
Estimate 12,182 ± 1,245; unweighted sample 580.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Nativity and citizenship

Born Abroad Of Us Parent7.8%
Estimate 2,357 ± 572; unweighted sample 111.
Naturalized Us Citizen56.6%
Estimate 17,108 ± 1,206; unweighted sample 907.
Not Us Citizen35.6%
Estimate 10,776 ± 1,362; unweighted sample 430.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Period of entry

2010 To 201921.8%
Estimate 6,583 ± 928; unweighted sample 293.
2020 Or Later7.6%
Estimate 2,298 ± 645; unweighted sample 106.
Before 201070.6%
Estimate 21,360 ± 1,620; unweighted sample 1049.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Age at migration

18 To 3451.7%
Estimate 15,630 ± 1,110; unweighted sample 781.
35 To 4911.5%
Estimate 3,466 ± 794; unweighted sample 162.
50 And Over2.3%
Estimate 692 ± 266; unweighted sample 39.
Under 1834.6%
Estimate 10,453 ± 1,091; unweighted sample 466.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Language and English proficiency

English Only35.3%
Estimate 10,547 ± 1,075; unweighted sample 476.
Not At AllSuppressed
Unweighted sample 7; public estimate withheld.
Not Well3.6%
Estimate 1,065 ± 455; unweighted sample 35.
Very Well47.9%
Estimate 14,290 ± 1,328; unweighted sample 706.
Well12.3%
Estimate 3,678 ± 556; unweighted sample 206.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Household size

Five Or More People8.9%
Estimate 2,187 ± 460; unweighted sample 100.
One Person19.7%
Estimate 4,831 ± 651; unweighted sample 218.
Three Or Four People38.5%
Estimate 9,467 ± 969; unweighted sample 437.
Two People32.9%
Estimate 8,095 ± 698; unweighted sample 437.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Household type

Family Household70.4%
Estimate 17,313 ± 1,304; unweighted sample 885.
Nonfamily Household29.6%
Estimate 7,267 ± 807; unweighted sample 307.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Multigenerational household

Multigenerational2.5%
Estimate 621 ± 217; unweighted sample 32.
Not Multigenerational97.5%
Estimate 23,959 ± 1,442; unweighted sample 1160.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Households with children

Children Present35.9%
Estimate 8,834 ± 919; unweighted sample 404.
No Children Present64.1%
Estimate 15,746 ± 1,073; unweighted sample 788.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Education

Bachelors20.0%
Estimate 5,383 ± 834; unweighted sample 267.
Graduate Or Professional28.0%
Estimate 7,525 ± 907; unweighted sample 379.
High School Or Equivalent22.3%
Estimate 5,998 ± 929; unweighted sample 270.
Less Than High School3.8%
Estimate 1,033 ± 352; unweighted sample 53.
Some College Or Associate25.9%
Estimate 6,976 ± 815; unweighted sample 335.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Employment

Armed ForcesSuppressed
Unweighted sample 2; public estimate withheld.
Employed63.6%
Estimate 18,472 ± 1,513; unweighted sample 841.
Not In Labor Force32.9%
Estimate 9,545 ± 900; unweighted sample 516.
Unemployed3.4%
Estimate 977 ± 351; unweighted sample 33.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Occupation

Management Business Science Arts50.2%
Estimate 11,300 ± 944; unweighted sample 548.
Military SpecificSuppressed
Unweighted sample 1; public estimate withheld.
Natural Resources Construction Maintenance8.2%
Estimate 1,837 ± 467; unweighted sample 77.
Production Transportation Material Moving5.5%
Estimate 1,228 ± 370; unweighted sample 59.
Sales And Office18.3%
Estimate 4,114 ± 836; unweighted sample 186.
Service17.8%
Estimate 4,011 ± 780; unweighted sample 164.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Industry

Agriculture Forestry Fishing MiningSuppressed
Unweighted sample 8; public estimate withheld.
Arts Entertainment Hospitality9.9%
Estimate 2,179 ± 508; unweighted sample 92.
Construction8.8%
Estimate 1,930 ± 525; unweighted sample 75.
Education Health Social Services22.5%
Estimate 4,947 ± 742; unweighted sample 237.
Finance Insurance Real Estate6.3%
Estimate 1,395 ± 362; unweighted sample 59.
Information2.6%
Estimate 578 ± 276; unweighted sample 27.
Manufacturing6.1%
Estimate 1,346 ± 284; unweighted sample 76.
MilitarySuppressed
Unweighted sample 2; public estimate withheld.
Other Services6.4%
Estimate 1,401 ± 433; unweighted sample 66.
Professional Administrative18.3%
Estimate 4,025 ± 706; unweighted sample 194.
Public Administration4.1%
Estimate 899 ± 291; unweighted sample 40.
Retail Trade7.2%
Estimate 1,576 ± 409; unweighted sample 76.
Transportation Utilities4.0%
Estimate 889 ± 328; unweighted sample 46.
Wholesale TradeSuppressed
Unweighted sample 25; public estimate withheld.
Other Or Suppressed3.9%
Estimate 870 ± Not enough reliable data; unweighted sample 35.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Personal income

100000 Or More22.0%
Estimate 6,398 ± 659; unweighted sample 307.
1 To 2499924.1%
Estimate 7,020 ± 1,082; unweighted sample 352.
25000 To 4999919.3%
Estimate 5,629 ± 727; unweighted sample 274.
50000 To 9999923.6%
Estimate 6,884 ± 760; unweighted sample 317.
Zero Or Negative11.0%
Estimate 3,195 ± 561; unweighted sample 145.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Poverty

100 To 199 Percent10.1%
Estimate 3,016 ± 741; unweighted sample 148.
200 To 399 Percent22.9%
Estimate 6,823 ± 871; unweighted sample 318.
400 Percent Or More55.0%
Estimate 16,361 ± 1,234; unweighted sample 800.
Below 100 Percent11.9%
Estimate 3,538 ± 740; unweighted sample 143.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Health insurance

Covered90.0%
Estimate 27,222 ± 1,720; unweighted sample 1336.
Not Covered10.0%
Estimate 3,019 ± 771; unweighted sample 112.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Disability

With Disability8.8%
Estimate 2,666 ± 464; unweighted sample 144.
Without Disability91.2%
Estimate 27,575 ± 1,822; unweighted sample 1304.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Housing tenure

Occupied Without Cash RentSuppressed
Unweighted sample 18; public estimate withheld.
Owned Free And Clear28.1%
Estimate 6,914 ± 740; unweighted sample 392.
Owned With Mortgage40.6%
Estimate 9,973 ± 905; unweighted sample 510.
Rented29.6%
Estimate 7,280 ± 982; unweighted sample 272.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: limited.

Housing-cost burden

30 To 49 Percent21.0%
Estimate 1,518 ± 576; unweighted sample 46.
50 Percent Or More23.9%
Estimate 1,725 ± 501; unweighted sample 64.
Under 30 Percent55.1%
Estimate 3,987 ± 646; unweighted sample 161.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: moderate.

Residential tenure length

Established Residence39.5%
Estimate 9,708 ± 775; unweighted sample 537.
Mid Term Residence41.0%
Estimate 10,090 ± 1,109; unweighted sample 433.
Recent Move19.5%
Estimate 4,782 ± 698; unweighted sample 222.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

Residential mobility

Arrived From Outside Us3.9%
Estimate 1,168 ± 487; unweighted sample 52.
Different House In Us9.7%
Estimate 2,936 ± 598; unweighted sample 136.
Same House86.4%
Estimate 26,126 ± 1,861; unweighted sample 1259.

Aggregate estimates; reliability: high.

How this community differs across states

Highest community presence

  1. California/CA — 5,600
  2. Florida/FL — 3,868
  3. New York/NY — 2,942
  4. Illinois/IL — 1,931
  5. Arizona/AZ — 1,295
  6. Texas/TX — 1,245
  7. Colorado/CO — 1,189
  8. New Jersey/NJ — 1,187
  9. Washington/WA — 1,155
  10. Pennsylvania/PA — 1,073

Highest location quotient

  1. Colorado/CO — 2.25
  2. Arizona/AZ — 1.94
  3. Florida/FL — 1.91
  4. Illinois/IL — 1.68
  5. New York/NY — 1.64
  6. Washington/WA — 1.64
  7. California/CA — 1.58
  8. New Jersey/NJ — 1.41
  9. Oregon/OR — 1.17
  10. Pennsylvania/PA — 0.91

Closest surrounding demographic contexts

  1. New Hampshire/NH — 93.8%
  2. Vermont/VT — 93.0%
  3. Rhode Island/RI — 92.6%
  4. District of Columbia/DC — 92.1%
  5. Colorado/CO — 90.1%
  6. Maine/ME — 90.0%
  7. Minnesota/MN — 89.4%
  8. Montana/MT — 89.4%
  9. Wyoming/WY — 89.3%
  10. Connecticut/CT — 89.2%

Highest presence and closest surrounding context answer different questions and are never substituted for one another.

How this community compares with the United States

State-context comparisons use the same source period and composition schema. National community averages should not be treated as characteristics of any person.

The U.S.–Czechia community contains materially different racial, ethnic, generational, linguistic, geographic, household, and socioeconomic profiles. National averages should not be treated as characteristics of every person.

Closest demographic peers

Peer rankings use population and settlement, migration, race and ethnicity, age and household, education and economic structure, language, and housing as separately disclosed dimensions.

Closest demographic peer 1

U.S.–Serbia community

93.1% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 93.1% · without: 91.9% · rank change: 2.

Strongest similarities: Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable), Housing and mobility, Age and household

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Migration, nativity, and generation, Education, work, and income

View dimension scores
Age and household
96.6%
Education, work, and income
96.0%
Housing and mobility
96.6%
Migration, nativity, and generation
95.9%
Population and settlement
83.4%
Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable)
97.5%
Population scale
94.5%
Settlement concentration
97.0%
State footprint
58.7%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Closest demographic peer 2

U.S.–Slovakia community

92.5% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 92.5% · without: 92.5% · rank change: -1.

Strongest similarities: Housing and mobility, Migration, nativity, and generation, Age and household

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Education, work, and income, Age and household

View dimension scores
Age and household
96.9%
Education, work, and income
95.8%
Housing and mobility
98.8%
Migration, nativity, and generation
96.9%
Population and settlement
83.7%
Population scale
94.1%
Settlement concentration
95.2%
State footprint
61.9%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Closest demographic peer 3

U.S.–Finland community

92.2% balanced demographic structural similarity · high reliability.

With race and ethnicity: 92.2% · without: 90.5% · rank change: 6.

Strongest similarities: Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable), Housing and mobility, Migration, nativity, and generation

Largest differences: Population and settlement, Education, work, and income, Age and household

View dimension scores
Age and household
95.6%
Education, work, and income
91.9%
Housing and mobility
96.9%
Migration, nativity, and generation
96.7%
Population and settlement
81.6%
Race and ethnicity (ancestry unavailable)
98.4%
Population scale
94.2%
Settlement concentration
94.8%
State footprint
55.9%

Population scale, settlement concentration, and state footprint remain separately reported components.

Largest measured differences

The comparison asset reports the lowest demographic structural similarities without describing communities as enemies, opposites, incompatible groups, or unlikely allies.

  1. U.S.–Mexico community — 60.4% measured structural similarity
  2. U.S.–Marshall Islands community — 61.8% measured structural similarity
  3. U.S.–India community — 61.9% measured structural similarity

Explore peers in Ally Finder

Data quality

Profile state
eligible_high_reliability
Reliable dimensions
19
Observed basis
Country of birth in the 2020–2024 ACS 5-year PUMS

Suppressed cells remain labeled. Missing values and shared zeroes do not create similarity.

What should not be inferred

Aggregate demographic similarity does not establish agreement, alliance, representation, consent, endorsement, political behavior, nationality, dual citizenship, religion, caste, tribe, sect, or individual identity.

How the comparison was calculated

Dimension-specific categorical distributions use square-root Jensen–Shannon distance; ordered distributions use bounded Wasserstein distance; population totals use log-scaled distance; and state footprints use Jensen–Shannon distance. Available reliable dimensions are combined with versioned weights. KNN is a retrieval method, not a public claim about alliance.

Weights · Sources · Data quality