Military Family Care & Mobility applies a legal standard to Women
The verified holding expressly addresses sex-based military spousal-benefit eligibility, creating a bounded legal-standard edge for women.
- Relationship ID
relationship:v728:66a34db215493039babf- Direction
- ISSUE_TO_STAKEHOLDER_WITH_RECIPROCAL_RENDERING
- Type
- reltype:legal-standard-applies-to-role
- Evidence lane
- EXPLICIT_SUPPORT
- Geographic scope
- United States
- Temporal scope
- As of 2026-08-25
- First published
- v7.28
- Last changed
- v7.28
What the relationship means
A verified judicial holding supplies a bounded legal standard that expressly governs the named role in the issue-specific evidence record.
Issue: Military Family Care & Mobility · Stakeholder: Women
Why it passed governance
A verified issue-specific record and its source expressly identify the stakeholder role and the legal relationship asserted by the selected type.
Admission rule: admission:v728:explicit-role-support. Exact role anchor: sex-based military spousal-benefit eligibility.
Supporting evidence
Frontiero v. Richardson · Cornell Legal Information Institute; opinion authored by the U.S. Supreme Court · publication 1973 · retrieved 2026-08-24
Qualifications and limitations
The source expressly uses the stated legal classification in the bounded context; the edge does not generalize experience, establish injury or liability, or infer a shared identity-group position.
Application outside the cited issue, role, jurisdiction, and source proposition requires separate evidence.
What this edge does not establish
It does not establish causation, a violation, liability, endorsement, affiliation, representation, political alignment, a shared stakeholder belief, exclusivity, or that omitted stakeholders are irrelevant.