Indo-Tibetan Migration, Asylum & Consular Access applies a legal standard to Foreign-born residents
The verified holding governs asylum applicants, a bounded subset of foreign-born residents seeking protection.
- Relationship ID
relationship:v728:5467cf45d0e2841605f6- Direction
- ISSUE_TO_STAKEHOLDER_WITH_RECIPROCAL_RENDERING
- Type
- reltype:legal-standard-applies-to-role
- Evidence lane
- EXPLICIT_SUPPORT
- Geographic scope
- United States
- Temporal scope
- As of 2026-08-25
- First published
- v7.28
- Last changed
- v7.28
What the relationship means
A verified judicial holding supplies a bounded legal standard that expressly governs the named role in the issue-specific evidence record.
Issue: Indo-Tibetan Migration, Asylum & Consular Access · Stakeholder: Foreign-born residents
Why it passed governance
A verified issue-specific record and its source expressly identify the stakeholder role and the legal relationship asserted by the selected type.
Admission rule: admission:v728:explicit-role-support. Exact role anchor: asylum applicant standard.
Supporting evidence
INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Cornell Legal Information Institute; opinion authored by the U.S. Supreme Court · publication 1987 · retrieved 2026-08-24
Qualifications and limitations
The edge is limited to asylum applicants and does not generalize foreign-born residents, establish eligibility, or imply a shared position.
Application outside the cited issue, role, jurisdiction, and source proposition requires separate evidence.
What this edge does not establish
It does not establish causation, a violation, liability, endorsement, affiliation, representation, political alignment, a shared stakeholder belief, exclusivity, or that omitted stakeholders are irrelevant.