intake:automation-ai-and-worker-transition:capital-fit | capital-fit | P2 | Establish funding and implementation fit for Automation, AI & Worker Transition. | Capital pathways: Workforce development, small-business finance, CDFIs, consumer protection, transition assistance, public investment and responsible procurement. Record instrument, payer, intermediary, recipient, restriction, duration, risk allocation, beneficiary reach and observed outcome separately. | Query the funding and award sources in the issue packet; distinguish appropriations, obligations, outlays, grants, contracts, loans, guarantees, tax expenditures and private capital. | Published · owner-authorized |
|---|
intake:automation-ai-and-worker-transition:definition-authority | definition-authority | P1 | Add authoritative definitions and scope boundaries for Automation, AI & Worker Transition. | research scope: Assess work, wages, bargaining, market concentration, consumer finance, tax, entrepreneurship, wealth and mobility with institutional and distributional analysis. For Automation, AI & Worker Transition, treat the unit of analysis as a source-defined law, rule, institution, service, market, exposure, process or observed outcome. Do not infer a claim from category membership, identity, geography or association alone. Starting authorities: Antitrust Division, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, Current Population Survey. | Extract the operative definition, jurisdiction, exclusions, legal/status hierarchy and date from the cited sources; store exact locators. | Published · owner-authorized |
|---|
intake:automation-ai-and-worker-transition:implementation | implementation | P2 | Document supported implementation pathways for Automation, AI & Worker Transition. | Implementation approach: Track participation, wages, job quality, bargaining, market structure, credit terms, debt, ownership, tax incidence and mobility by population and place. Operationally, create an issue-specific logic chain from authority and need through implementer, action, output, outcome, remedy and feedback. | Populate responsible authority, implementer, delivery channel, eligibility, process step, service standard, output, outcome, cost and failure mode. | Published · owner-authorized |
|---|
intake:automation-ai-and-worker-transition:measures-trends | measures-trends | P1 | Assign dated measures or a comparable time series for Automation, AI & Worker Transition. | Measurement framework: labor-force participation and employment; wages/earnings and hours; occupational or leadership representation; hiring, retention, promotion and separation; complaints, findings, remedies or bargaining coverage; gap by subgroup, industry and geography. Denominator: Working-age population, labor force, covered employees or applicants as appropriate; do not use raw complaint counts as prevalence. Cadence: Monthly/annual labor series and multiyear enforcement or representation trends. | Extract a baseline, latest value and comparable time series for each feasible indicator; retain numerator, denominator, geography, subgroup, methodology and vintage. | Published · owner-authorized |
|---|
intake:automation-ai-and-worker-transition:relationships | relationships | P2 | Add explicit supported relationship records for Automation, AI & Worker Transition where evidence warrants them. | Candidate research relationships: Antitrust, Market Concentration & Competition (0.25; shared institutional/source pathway); Tax Fairness, Public Revenue & Fiscal Capacity (0.25; shared institutional/source pathway); Consumer Finance, Household Debt & Financial Protection (0.22; shared institutional/source pathway). These are routing hypotheses based on title/source proximity, not research intersectionality or causal findings. | For each candidate pair, test a named shared mechanism, direction, comparator, counterfactual, distinctiveness and independent source support. | Published · owner-authorized |
|---|
intake:automation-ai-and-worker-transition:risks-safeguards | risks-safeguards | P2 | Document issue-specific risks, failure conditions, and safeguards for Automation, AI & Worker Transition. | Material risks: Market power, precarity, automation displacement, predatory finance, wealth concentration, exclusionary capital and regressive burden. Required safeguards: Competition enforcement, labor standards, transparent credit, fair lending, portable supports, inclusive finance, worker voice and distributional evaluation. | Create one risk-control record per material risk with trigger, affected population, preventive control, detective control, remedy, owner and monitoring indicator. | Published · owner-authorized |
|---|
intake:automation-ai-and-worker-transition:rulings-confirmatory | rulings-confirmatory | P1 | Acquire confirmatory rulings for Automation, AI & Worker Transition. | No direct confirmatory ruling was identified in the current research registry for Automation, AI & Worker Transition. The issue remains supported by non-adjudicatory authorities in the issue source packet, but absence from this registry is not proof that no case, tribunal decision or agency order exists. | Search official federal/state/territorial/tribal or international court and agency repositories using the issue elements, jurisdiction, regulated actor, remedy and adverse-result terms; record negative search scope. | Published · owner-authorized |
|---|
intake:automation-ai-and-worker-transition:rulings-disconfirmatory | rulings-disconfirmatory | P1 | Acquire disconfirmatory, limiting, adverse, or narrowing rulings for Automation, AI & Worker Transition. | Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 584 U.S. 497 (U.S. Supreme Court, 2018). Enforced individualized arbitration agreements requiring employees to pursue claims separately under the Federal Arbitration Act. Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis rejects, narrows, limits, or supplies adverse authority relevant to Automation, AI & Worker Transition. Fit tier: Contextual. The placement must be used only within the holding and limitations recorded here. | Verify official text, current precedential status, later treatment, pinpoint holding, jurisdiction and exact issue-claim linkage; add lower-court or agency authorities where needed. | Published · owner-authorized |
|---|
intake:automation-ai-and-worker-transition:sources-policy-rulings | sources-policy-rulings | P1 | Acquire sources, datasets, policy records, and rulings for Automation, AI & Worker Transition. | A 12-source issue packet has been assembled from the Source Registry. Confirmatory ruling gap documented; disconfirmatory/limiting candidate: Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis (Contextual). Policy, data, implementation and adjudicatory sources remain separately typed. | Extract exact locators and claim linkages; perform legal currentness review; add jurisdiction-specific lower-court and agency material where the registry records a gap or analogue. | Published · owner-authorized |
|---|
intake:automation-ai-and-worker-transition:stakeholder-authority | stakeholder-authority | P2 | Identify documented affected groups, institutional actors, and decision authority for Automation, AI & Worker Transition. | Stakeholder set: Workers, households, unions, employers, small businesses, lenders, consumers, investors, regulators and communities. Separate affected people, rights holders, duty bearers, funders, implementers, data holders, adjudicators, advocates and potential opposing interests. | Validate each stakeholder class from a cited source; record authority, interest, exposure, decision rights, accountability and conflict-of-interest. | Published · owner-authorized |
|---|
intake:automation-ai-and-worker-transition:systems-differences | systems-differences | P2 | Source the systems and distributional differences material to Automation, AI & Worker Transition. | Systems map: Labor law and markets; antitrust; credit and debt; taxation; business formation and finance; public benefits; wealth accumulation and regional transition. Compare legal regime, eligibility, administrative process, funding, delivery channel, data definition, geography and population before making cross-system claims. | Build a comparison matrix across jurisdictions and subgroups; record which dimensions are comparable, non-comparable or missing. | Published · owner-authorized |
|---|
intake:automation-ai-and-worker-transition:tensions | tensions | P2 | Document issue-specific tensions or contrary evidence for Automation, AI & Worker Transition. | Material tensions: Efficiency versus worker power; innovation versus displacement; credit access versus consumer risk; growth versus distribution.. Limiting authority candidate: Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis (Contextual). | Record each tension as competing claim A/claim B, affected stakeholders, legal/policy authority, empirical trade-off, boundary conditions and adjudication or decision rule. | Published · owner-authorized |
|---|
intake:automation-ai-and-worker-transition:values-responsibilities | values-responsibilities | P2 | Document issue-specific values and institutional responsibilities for Automation, AI & Worker Transition. | Values and responsibilities: Economic dignity, fair opportunity, mobility, competition, worker voice, household security and responsible capital. Translate these into explicit duties for government, institutions, funders, implementers, data stewards and affected-community governance. | Link each asserted value to a legal, policy or ethical authority and to a measurable institutional responsibility, safeguard and remedy. | Published · owner-authorized |
|---|