Complete pair closure required
Every displayed record links to the shared governed group record inherited from the sealed v7.10 predecessor and contains all K×(K−1)/2 constituent pairs.
Intersectionality Beta · current-taxonomy research assessment · August 15, 2026
Issue Closeness & Intersectionality
Explore the supplied K=2 through K=7 research candidates that retain complete constituent-pair matrices across the current 1,139-issue assessment.
1,139 canonical issues
K=2 through K=7
Duplicate seed assignments collapsed
Research candidates only
0 verified conclusions
Interpretation boundary. These results are metadata-based research candidates. Numerical proximity and the accompanying abstract do not independently establish factual association, causation, coordination, common actors, common affected populations, discriminatory intent, legal equivalence, culpability, conspiracy, stakeholder impact, or an evidence-verified intersection. Verification requires independent evidence, counterevidence review, and deterministic evidence requirements.
Coverage boundary. The source assessment exports a bounded K=2 queue and seeded K=3 through K=7 queues rather than exhaustive combination universes. Only supplied records with complete constituent-pair closure render here; 103 incomplete higher-order records remain explicitly excluded without inference or padding.
Delivered current-taxonomy queue
Unique groups with seed-level traceability
The cards count unique issue sets after reciprocal or repeated seed assignments are collapsed. They are delivered research candidates, not claims about a complete higher-order universe.
- K=2 unique pairs
- 14,405 complete pair-matrix records
- K=3 unique groups
- 691 8 incomplete groups excluded
- K=4 unique groups
- 570 15 incomplete groups excluded
- K=5 unique groups
- 484 19 incomplete groups excluded
- K=6 unique groups
- 407 29 incomplete groups excluded
- K=7 unique groups
- 340 32 incomplete groups excluded
One record per issue set
Reciprocal K=2 rows and repeated K=3–K=7 groups are collapsed without discarding their source assignments.
Candidate, not conclusion
All results still require mechanism, population, jurisdiction, timeframe, source-fit, counterevidence, and review.
Interactive research queue
Explore the delivered K2–K7 trends
The default view shows every delivered unique candidate. Apply a threshold or taxonomy filter to narrow the bounded queue.
Active filters: None
View:
K=7 bounded candidate view
340 unique groups match the filters
Loading the accepted complete-pair-matrix projection…
Loading the deduplicated K=7 candidate queue…
| Candidate | K | Group closeness | Intersectionality | Minimum pair | Taxonomy breadth | Status | Contexts | Stakeholders | Case studies | Action |
|---|
Workbook decile labels
Delivered closeness distribution
Counts use the source workbook’s fixed closeness bands after deduplication. They do not describe evidence confidence or completeness.
| Band | K=2 | K=3 | K=4 | K=5 | K=6 | K=7 |
|---|
K=2 cross-category routing signal
Leading delivered category corridors
Counts identify where the bounded K=2 export is concentrated. They do not measure importance, coalition size, or social agreement.
| Category corridor | Eligible k=2 candidates | At or above 25% | Mean intersectionality | Maximum |
|---|
Method and provenance
How this assessment formed its trends
The supplied workbook uses outside-in and inside-out metadata screening, then applies group cohesion and taxonomy breadth. This is not the July governed generator and does not replace the preserved historical model.
Closeness components
Higher-order rule
- Group closeness: 70% mean pair score + 30% minimum pair score.
- Breadth: 65% subcategory breadth + 35% category breadth.
- Intersectionality: group closeness × breadth factor.
- Coverage: K=2 is a top-20-per-seed export; K=3–K=7 are bounded seeded groups.
Required next review
- Identify the specific shared or competing mechanism.
- Confirm compatible populations, places, jurisdictions, and timeframes.
- Inspect exact sources, limitations, and counterevidence.
- Promote only through the governed intersection-edge workflow.
Open analysis readiness · View governed relationship records
Exact workbook and generated-data provenance
- Workbook SHA-256
605fa000b315ee200d18db3ac2c06403e3f556c7406f10852d5c3f554cfc0ab0- Analysis version
intersectionality-trends-2026-08-15-k2-k7-bounded-v1- Taxonomy
2026-08-15-racial-hierarchy-hate-religious-power-v1- Generated data
- summary · issue registry · manifest and bundle hash
- Historical reference
- The July 24 K=2–K=5 model remains published under its existing v3 manifest. It is not silently merged with the current assessment because the measurement procedures differ.
- Constituent-pair boundary
- The workbook exports aggregate K=3–K=7 group values but not the full constituent-pair score matrix. Missing pair detail remains missing; no zero, mean, or inferred replacement is used.