Verified bounded evidence recordINS v. Cardoza-Fonseca
Distinguished the asylum 'well-founded fear' standard from the more demanding withholding-of-removal standard.
- Evidence ID
evidence:v724:ffd88d1aae3f4bf0bd95- Verification
- VERIFIED_BOUNDED_EVIDENCE_PROPOSITION
- Support direction
- SUPPORTS
- Publisher
- Cornell Legal Information Institute; opinion authored by the U.S. Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- United States
Exact source
INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca
Scope and limitations
Eligibility still requires fact-specific proof and does not guarantee discretionary relief.
Verification is bounded to the recorded proposition. It does not independently verify the complete issue or establish every relationship that might be plausible.
Show the record
- Stable ID
canonical-route:/research/evidence/records/ffd88d1aae3f4bf0bd95/- Record type
- Analytical reader surface
- Publication/readiness state
- unknown — inspect the source-specific record
- Model/method version
- Preserved governed method; rendered through the v7.44 reader-first template
- As-of/currentness date
- Page projection 2026-08-30; source dates remain record-specific
- Source uses
- Record-specific source uses remain in the underlying governed artifact
- Exact locators
- Displayed only when supplied by the governed record; missing locators remain missing
- Limitations
- Route presence and computational output are not evidence; missingness remains explicit.
- Counterevidence state
- Not inferred; unknown or not evaluated remains explicit
- Review/governance history
- Deterministic release lineage; no human truth adjudication added