Verified bounded evidence recordGeduldig v. Aiello
Held that exclusion of pregnancy-related disabilities from a state insurance program was not, on that record, a sex classification under the Equal Protection Clause.
- Evidence ID
evidence:v724:c61f6ce64db3f3506d38- Verification
- VERIFIED_BOUNDED_EVIDENCE_PROPOSITION
- Support direction
- CONTRADICTS_OR_LIMITS
- Publisher
- Cornell Legal Information Institute; opinion authored by the U.S. Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- United States
Exact source
Geduldig v. Aiello
Scope and limitations
Subsequent statutes, including the Pregnancy Discrimination Act and Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, materially alter employment-law analysis.
Verification is bounded to the recorded proposition. It does not independently verify the complete issue or establish every relationship that might be plausible.
Show the record
- Stable ID
canonical-route:/research/evidence/records/c61f6ce64db3f3506d38/- Record type
- Analytical reader surface
- Publication/readiness state
- unknown — inspect the source-specific record
- Model/method version
- Preserved governed method; rendered through the v7.44 reader-first template
- As-of/currentness date
- Page projection 2026-08-30; source dates remain record-specific
- Source uses
- Record-specific source uses remain in the underlying governed artifact
- Exact locators
- Displayed only when supplied by the governed record; missing locators remain missing
- Limitations
- Route presence and computational output are not evidence; missingness remains explicit.
- Counterevidence state
- Not inferred; unknown or not evaluated remains explicit
- Review/governance history
- Deterministic release lineage; no human truth adjudication added