Discover → Select → Compare → Read
Find how civic issues relate.
Browse all 289 governed categories, subcategories, and issues; select two to five; and read closeness separately from relationship routing and intersectionality.
Closeness describes proximity. It does not establish intersectionality. Selections stay in this browser; no visitor selection is sent to an AI provider.
Loading governed Finder records…
Discover and select
Comparison brief
Choose two themes to compare. No preset is selected.
How to read the Finder
- Closeness: universal score and governed decile for each valid pair.
- Relationship routing: taxonomy, parallel, unrelated, insufficient, or structurally eligible.
- Intersectionality: independent evidence adjudication; withheld when readiness conditions are not met.
Finding
Generated comparison findings appear above after selection.
Closeness
Every valid constituent pair retains its universal closeness score and decile.
Relationship routing
Routing is independent from closeness.
Intersectionality
Unsupported percentages remain withheld.
Evidence
Sources and readiness accompany publishable findings.
Counterevidence
Material tensions and contrary evidence remain visible.
Limits
Missing evidence is never converted to zero.
Next
Open stable issue records or continue research.
Show the record
Technical model identity, provenance, and review history are available here rather than in the primary reading path.