{
  "record_count": 16,
  "records": [
    {
      "exclusion_rule": "Do not infer records from Finder similarity, taxonomy proximity, shared keywords, geography, publisher, identity, or missingness.",
      "formula": "All PUBLISHED_GOVERNED records whose issue_id equals the selected canonical issue ID.",
      "inclusion_rule": "Use only canonical records published in the sealed v7.28 governed corpus and validated issue IDs from the sealed v7.29 index.",
      "input_registries": [
        "data/stakeholder-threading-v728/issue-stakeholder-relationships.v3.json",
        "data/insight-observatory-v729/insight-record-index.v1.json"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "Published coverage is sparse and does not establish the complete real-world relationship universe."
      ],
      "method_id": "method:v730:issue-edge-set",
      "method_version": "1.0.0",
      "missing_data": "Unknown, unavailable, and not-applicable states remain explicit and are not converted to zero.",
      "name": "Selected issue edge set",
      "prohibited_interpretations": [
        "causality",
        "stakeholder belief or position",
        "real-world completeness",
        "issue importance",
        "policy recommendation",
        "overall intersection score"
      ],
      "question": "Which governed edges are published for an issue?",
      "ties": "Exact ties are retained in stable canonical-ID order.",
      "unit": "governed relationship"
    },
    {
      "exclusion_rule": "Do not infer records from Finder similarity, taxonomy proximity, shared keywords, geography, publisher, identity, or missingness.",
      "formula": "Distinct stakeholder_id over the selected issue edge set.",
      "inclusion_rule": "Use only canonical records published in the sealed v7.28 governed corpus and validated issue IDs from the sealed v7.29 index.",
      "input_registries": [
        "data/stakeholder-threading-v728/issue-stakeholder-relationships.v3.json",
        "data/insight-observatory-v729/insight-record-index.v1.json"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "Published coverage is sparse and does not establish the complete real-world relationship universe."
      ],
      "method_id": "method:v730:stakeholder-set",
      "method_version": "1.0.0",
      "missing_data": "Unknown, unavailable, and not-applicable states remain explicit and are not converted to zero.",
      "name": "Selected issue stakeholder set",
      "prohibited_interpretations": [
        "causality",
        "stakeholder belief or position",
        "real-world completeness",
        "issue importance",
        "policy recommendation",
        "overall intersection score"
      ],
      "question": "Which distinct governed stakeholders are published for an issue?",
      "ties": "Exact ties are retained in stable canonical-ID order.",
      "unit": "distinct canonical stakeholder"
    },
    {
      "exclusion_rule": "Do not infer records from Finder similarity, taxonomy proximity, shared keywords, geography, publisher, identity, or missingness.",
      "formula": "Intersection of stakeholder_set(i) across every selected issue.",
      "inclusion_rule": "Use only canonical records published in the sealed v7.28 governed corpus and validated issue IDs from the sealed v7.29 index.",
      "input_registries": [
        "data/stakeholder-threading-v728/issue-stakeholder-relationships.v3.json",
        "data/insight-observatory-v729/insight-record-index.v1.json"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "Published coverage is sparse and does not establish the complete real-world relationship universe."
      ],
      "method_id": "method:v730:all-issue-common-stakeholder",
      "method_version": "1.0.0",
      "missing_data": "Unknown, unavailable, and not-applicable states remain explicit and are not converted to zero.",
      "name": "All-issue common stakeholder",
      "prohibited_interpretations": [
        "causality",
        "stakeholder belief or position",
        "real-world completeness",
        "issue importance",
        "policy recommendation",
        "overall intersection score"
      ],
      "question": "Which stakeholder connects every selected issue?",
      "ties": "Exact ties are retained in stable canonical-ID order.",
      "unit": "distinct canonical stakeholder"
    },
    {
      "exclusion_rule": "Do not infer records from Finder similarity, taxonomy proximity, shared keywords, geography, publisher, identity, or missingness.",
      "formula": "Stakeholder with a published edge to at least two selected issue IDs; coverage_fraction=connected selected issues/K.",
      "inclusion_rule": "Use only canonical records published in the sealed v7.28 governed corpus and validated issue IDs from the sealed v7.29 index.",
      "input_registries": [
        "data/stakeholder-threading-v728/issue-stakeholder-relationships.v3.json",
        "data/insight-observatory-v729/insight-record-index.v1.json"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "Published coverage is sparse and does not establish the complete real-world relationship universe.",
        "Coverage fraction is descriptive, not an importance score."
      ],
      "method_id": "method:v730:bridge-stakeholder",
      "method_version": "1.0.0",
      "missing_data": "Unknown, unavailable, and not-applicable states remain explicit and are not converted to zero.",
      "name": "Bridge stakeholder",
      "prohibited_interpretations": [
        "causality",
        "stakeholder belief or position",
        "real-world completeness",
        "issue importance",
        "policy recommendation",
        "overall intersection score"
      ],
      "question": "Which stakeholders connect at least two selected issues?",
      "ties": "Exact ties are retained in stable canonical-ID order.",
      "unit": "distinct canonical stakeholder"
    },
    {
      "exclusion_rule": "Do not infer records from Finder similarity, taxonomy proximity, shared keywords, geography, publisher, identity, or missingness.",
      "formula": "Distinct stakeholder IDs in stakeholder_set(a) ∩ stakeholder_set(b).",
      "inclusion_rule": "Use only canonical records published in the sealed v7.28 governed corpus and validated issue IDs from the sealed v7.29 index.",
      "input_registries": [
        "data/stakeholder-threading-v728/issue-stakeholder-relationships.v3.json",
        "data/insight-observatory-v729/insight-record-index.v1.json"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "Published coverage is sparse and does not establish the complete real-world relationship universe."
      ],
      "method_id": "method:v730:pairwise-bridge",
      "method_version": "1.0.0",
      "missing_data": "Unknown, unavailable, and not-applicable states remain explicit and are not converted to zero.",
      "name": "Pairwise bridge",
      "prohibited_interpretations": [
        "causality",
        "stakeholder belief or position",
        "real-world completeness",
        "issue importance",
        "policy recommendation",
        "overall intersection score"
      ],
      "question": "Which stakeholders are shared by each issue pair?",
      "ties": "Exact ties are retained in stable canonical-ID order.",
      "unit": "distinct canonical stakeholder per issue pair"
    },
    {
      "exclusion_rule": "Do not infer records from Finder similarity, taxonomy proximity, shared keywords, geography, publisher, identity, or missingness.",
      "formula": "Union and set intersection of relationship_type_id by selected issue.",
      "inclusion_rule": "Use only canonical records published in the sealed v7.28 governed corpus and validated issue IDs from the sealed v7.29 index.",
      "input_registries": [
        "data/stakeholder-threading-v728/issue-stakeholder-relationships.v3.json",
        "data/insight-observatory-v729/insight-record-index.v1.json"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "Published coverage is sparse and does not establish the complete real-world relationship universe."
      ],
      "method_id": "method:v730:relationship-type-overlap",
      "method_version": "1.0.0",
      "missing_data": "Unknown, unavailable, and not-applicable states remain explicit and are not converted to zero.",
      "name": "Relationship-type overlap",
      "prohibited_interpretations": [
        "causality",
        "stakeholder belief or position",
        "real-world completeness",
        "issue importance",
        "policy recommendation",
        "overall intersection score"
      ],
      "question": "Which relationship types are shared or differ?",
      "ties": "Exact ties are retained in stable canonical-ID order.",
      "unit": "canonical relationship type"
    },
    {
      "exclusion_rule": "Do not infer records from Finder similarity, taxonomy proximity, shared keywords, geography, publisher, identity, or missingness.",
      "formula": "Same canonical evidence_id associated with governed edges for at least two selected issues.",
      "inclusion_rule": "Use only canonical records published in the sealed v7.28 governed corpus and validated issue IDs from the sealed v7.29 index.",
      "input_registries": [
        "data/stakeholder-threading-v728/issue-stakeholder-relationships.v3.json",
        "data/insight-observatory-v729/insight-record-index.v1.json"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "Published coverage is sparse and does not establish the complete real-world relationship universe.",
        "Shared publishers, titles, years, keywords, or domains are not shared evidence."
      ],
      "method_id": "method:v730:shared-evidence",
      "method_version": "1.0.0",
      "missing_data": "Unknown, unavailable, and not-applicable states remain explicit and are not converted to zero.",
      "name": "Shared canonical evidence",
      "prohibited_interpretations": [
        "causality",
        "stakeholder belief or position",
        "real-world completeness",
        "issue importance",
        "policy recommendation",
        "overall intersection score"
      ],
      "question": "Which same evidence records support two or more selected issues?",
      "ties": "Exact ties are retained in stable canonical-ID order.",
      "unit": "distinct canonical evidence record"
    },
    {
      "exclusion_rule": "Do not infer records from Finder similarity, taxonomy proximity, shared keywords, geography, publisher, identity, or missingness.",
      "formula": "Set intersection of canonical taxonomy ancestor IDs for selected issues.",
      "inclusion_rule": "Use only canonical records published in the sealed v7.28 governed corpus and validated issue IDs from the sealed v7.29 index.",
      "input_registries": [
        "data/stakeholder-threading-v728/issue-stakeholder-relationships.v3.json",
        "data/insight-observatory-v729/insight-record-index.v1.json"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "Published coverage is sparse and does not establish the complete real-world relationship universe.",
        "Taxonomy overlap is not a governed relationship."
      ],
      "method_id": "method:v730:taxonomy-overlap",
      "method_version": "1.0.0",
      "missing_data": "Unknown, unavailable, and not-applicable states remain explicit and are not converted to zero.",
      "name": "Taxonomy overlap",
      "prohibited_interpretations": [
        "causality",
        "stakeholder belief or position",
        "real-world completeness",
        "issue importance",
        "policy recommendation",
        "overall intersection score"
      ],
      "question": "Which canonical ancestors are common?",
      "ties": "Exact ties are retained in stable canonical-ID order.",
      "unit": "canonical taxonomy node"
    },
    {
      "exclusion_rule": "Do not infer records from Finder similarity, taxonomy proximity, shared keywords, geography, publisher, identity, or missingness.",
      "formula": "Union and intersection over normalized geographic_scope fields; any missing issue scope makes the all-selection intersection not measurable.",
      "inclusion_rule": "Use only canonical records published in the sealed v7.28 governed corpus and validated issue IDs from the sealed v7.29 index.",
      "input_registries": [
        "data/stakeholder-threading-v728/issue-stakeholder-relationships.v3.json",
        "data/insight-observatory-v729/insight-record-index.v1.json"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "Published coverage is sparse and does not establish the complete real-world relationship universe.",
        "Geography is not inferred from names, publishers, language, routes, identity, or user location."
      ],
      "method_id": "method:v730:normalized-geography",
      "method_version": "1.0.0",
      "missing_data": "Unknown, unavailable, and not-applicable states remain explicit and are not converted to zero.",
      "name": "Normalized geographic overlap",
      "prohibited_interpretations": [
        "causality",
        "stakeholder belief or position",
        "real-world completeness",
        "issue importance",
        "policy recommendation",
        "overall intersection score"
      ],
      "question": "Which canonical geographic scopes overlap?",
      "ties": "Exact ties are retained in stable canonical-ID order.",
      "unit": "canonical normalized scope"
    },
    {
      "exclusion_rule": "Do not infer records from Finder similarity, taxonomy proximity, shared keywords, geography, publisher, identity, or missingness.",
      "formula": "Raw issue-level counts and disclosed denominators for relationships, stakeholders, evidence, dates, lanes, types, and scopes.",
      "inclusion_rule": "Use only canonical records published in the sealed v7.28 governed corpus and validated issue IDs from the sealed v7.29 index.",
      "input_registries": [
        "data/stakeholder-threading-v728/issue-stakeholder-relationships.v3.json",
        "data/insight-observatory-v729/insight-record-index.v1.json"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "Published coverage is sparse and does not establish the complete real-world relationship universe.",
        "Differences do not rank importance, harm, influence, or research value."
      ],
      "method_id": "method:v730:differences",
      "method_version": "1.0.0",
      "missing_data": "Unknown, unavailable, and not-applicable states remain explicit and are not converted to zero.",
      "name": "Differences",
      "prohibited_interpretations": [
        "causality",
        "stakeholder belief or position",
        "real-world completeness",
        "issue importance",
        "policy recommendation",
        "overall intersection score"
      ],
      "question": "Where does published coverage differ?",
      "ties": "Exact ties are retained in stable canonical-ID order.",
      "unit": "selected canonical issue"
    },
    {
      "exclusion_rule": "Do not infer records from Finder similarity, taxonomy proximity, shared keywords, geography, publisher, identity, or missingness.",
      "formula": "Display only an existing canonical contradiction, conflict, or explicitly opposed-position record.",
      "inclusion_rule": "Use only canonical records published in the sealed v7.28 governed corpus and validated issue IDs from the sealed v7.29 index.",
      "input_registries": [
        "data/stakeholder-threading-v728/issue-stakeholder-relationships.v3.json",
        "data/insight-observatory-v729/insight-record-index.v1.json"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "Published coverage is sparse and does not establish the complete real-world relationship universe.",
        "No tension is inferred from unequal counts, types, categories, jurisdictions, or missing overlap."
      ],
      "method_id": "method:v730:documented-tension-gate",
      "method_version": "1.0.0",
      "missing_data": "Unknown, unavailable, and not-applicable states remain explicit and are not converted to zero.",
      "name": "Documented tension gate",
      "prohibited_interpretations": [
        "causality",
        "stakeholder belief or position",
        "real-world completeness",
        "issue importance",
        "policy recommendation",
        "overall intersection score"
      ],
      "question": "Is an actual source-qualified tension published?",
      "ties": "Exact ties are retained in stable canonical-ID order.",
      "unit": "canonical tension record"
    },
    {
      "exclusion_rule": "Do not infer records from Finder similarity, taxonomy proximity, shared keywords, geography, publisher, identity, or missingness.",
      "formula": "Map documented gap triggers to controlled question templates; stable sort by trigger and selected issue IDs.",
      "inclusion_rule": "Use only canonical records published in the sealed v7.28 governed corpus and validated issue IDs from the sealed v7.29 index.",
      "input_registries": [
        "data/stakeholder-threading-v728/issue-stakeholder-relationships.v3.json",
        "data/insight-observatory-v729/insight-record-index.v1.json"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "Published coverage is sparse and does not establish the complete real-world relationship universe.",
        "Questions are not findings, accusations, predictions, or recommendations."
      ],
      "method_id": "method:v730:research-frontier",
      "method_version": "1.0.0",
      "missing_data": "Unknown, unavailable, and not-applicable states remain explicit and are not converted to zero.",
      "name": "Research Frontier",
      "prohibited_interpretations": [
        "causality",
        "stakeholder belief or position",
        "real-world completeness",
        "issue importance",
        "policy recommendation",
        "overall intersection score"
      ],
      "question": "Which bounded questions follow from explicit gaps?",
      "ties": "Exact ties are retained in stable canonical-ID order.",
      "unit": "bounded open research question"
    },
    {
      "exclusion_rule": "Do not infer records from Finder similarity, taxonomy proximity, shared keywords, geography, publisher, identity, or missingness.",
      "formula": "Side-by-side exact values and A-minus-B differences for disclosed fields; set intersections and differences for record IDs.",
      "inclusion_rule": "Use only canonical records published in the sealed v7.28 governed corpus and validated issue IDs from the sealed v7.29 index.",
      "input_registries": [
        "data/stakeholder-threading-v728/issue-stakeholder-relationships.v3.json",
        "data/insight-observatory-v729/insight-record-index.v1.json"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "Published coverage is sparse and does not establish the complete real-world relationship universe.",
        "No score, winner, importance rank, or recommendation is produced."
      ],
      "method_id": "method:v730:combination-comparison",
      "method_version": "1.0.0",
      "missing_data": "Unknown, unavailable, and not-applicable states remain explicit and are not converted to zero.",
      "name": "Combination comparison",
      "prohibited_interpretations": [
        "causality",
        "stakeholder belief or position",
        "real-world completeness",
        "issue importance",
        "policy recommendation",
        "overall intersection score"
      ],
      "question": "How do two selected sets differ on named fields?",
      "ties": "Exact ties are retained in stable canonical-ID order.",
      "unit": "two validated issue combinations"
    },
    {
      "exclusion_rule": "Do not infer records from Finder similarity, taxonomy proximity, shared keywords, geography, publisher, identity, or missingness.",
      "formula": "Fixed deterministic selection classes with lexicographic tie handling and deduplication.",
      "inclusion_rule": "Use only canonical records published in the sealed v7.28 governed corpus and validated issue IDs from the sealed v7.29 index.",
      "input_registries": [
        "data/stakeholder-threading-v728/issue-stakeholder-relationships.v3.json",
        "data/insight-observatory-v729/insight-record-index.v1.json"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "Published coverage is sparse and does not establish the complete real-world relationship universe.",
        "Examples are not labeled best, urgent, or representative of society."
      ],
      "method_id": "method:v730:featured-example-selection",
      "method_version": "1.0.0",
      "missing_data": "Unknown, unavailable, and not-applicable states remain explicit and are not converted to zero.",
      "name": "Featured-example selection",
      "prohibited_interpretations": [
        "causality",
        "stakeholder belief or position",
        "real-world completeness",
        "issue importance",
        "policy recommendation",
        "overall intersection score"
      ],
      "question": "Which bounded examples demonstrate known analytical states?",
      "ties": "Exact ties are retained in stable canonical-ID order.",
      "unit": "issue combination"
    },
    {
      "exclusion_rule": "Do not infer records from Finder similarity, taxonomy proximity, shared keywords, geography, publisher, identity, or missingness.",
      "formula": "Controlled template populated only from the active structured analysis and sorted canonical record IDs.",
      "inclusion_rule": "Use only canonical records published in the sealed v7.28 governed corpus and validated issue IDs from the sealed v7.29 index.",
      "input_registries": [
        "data/stakeholder-threading-v728/issue-stakeholder-relationships.v3.json",
        "data/insight-observatory-v729/insight-record-index.v1.json"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "Published coverage is sparse and does not establish the complete real-world relationship universe."
      ],
      "method_id": "method:v730:intersection-brief",
      "method_version": "1.0.0",
      "missing_data": "Unknown, unavailable, and not-applicable states remain explicit and are not converted to zero.",
      "name": "Intersection Brief",
      "prohibited_interpretations": [
        "causality",
        "stakeholder belief or position",
        "real-world completeness",
        "issue importance",
        "policy recommendation",
        "overall intersection score"
      ],
      "question": "How is the active analysis reproduced for print and download?",
      "ties": "Exact ties are retained in stable canonical-ID order.",
      "unit": "one validated analysis"
    },
    {
      "exclusion_rule": "Do not infer records from Finder similarity, taxonomy proximity, shared keywords, geography, publisher, identity, or missingness.",
      "formula": "SHA-256 over canonical sorted schema, source release, issue IDs, method versions, and structured output.",
      "inclusion_rule": "Use only canonical records published in the sealed v7.28 governed corpus and validated issue IDs from the sealed v7.29 index.",
      "input_registries": [
        "data/stakeholder-threading-v728/issue-stakeholder-relationships.v3.json",
        "data/insight-observatory-v729/insight-record-index.v1.json"
      ],
      "limitations": [
        "Published coverage is sparse and does not establish the complete real-world relationship universe."
      ],
      "method_id": "method:v730:analysis-identity",
      "method_version": "1.0.0",
      "missing_data": "Unknown, unavailable, and not-applicable states remain explicit and are not converted to zero.",
      "name": "Analysis identity and content hash",
      "prohibited_interpretations": [
        "causality",
        "stakeholder belief or position",
        "real-world completeness",
        "issue importance",
        "policy recommendation",
        "overall intersection score"
      ],
      "question": "How is identical input recognized?",
      "ties": "Exact ties are retained in stable canonical-ID order.",
      "unit": "one validated analysis"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "wsmusings.intersection-method-registry.v1"
}