{ "contentHash": "5b8c4d5fa712c6f8c357845c3c5a6e7f62df6fa3e281a57c0df4773bc091a467", "recordCount": 14, "records": [ { "denominator_definition": "Published v7.27 relationship IDs for the start value; v7.28 is reported separately.", "exclusion_rules": [ "Unpublished candidates and computational relationships." ], "formula": "Set comparison on stable relationship IDs; added = v7.28 minus v7.27, retained = intersection, retired = v7.27 minus v7.28; changed requires a semantic-field difference.", "inclusion_rules": [ "Published governed relationships in either archived snapshot." ], "input_registries": [ "stakeholder-threading-v727.relationships", "stakeholder-threading-v728.relationships" ], "limitations": [ "Two releases are a release-to-release comparison, not a trend." ], "method_id": "method:v729:release-relationship-diff", "method_version": "1.0.0", "minimum_publication_threshold": "At least one eligible record unless a method-specific threshold is stated.", "missing_data_handling": "Unknown values are retained as a separate state and are not silently removed.", "numerator_definition": "Added relationship IDs.", "plain_language_name": "Relationship release comparison", "prohibited_interpretations": [ "real-world prevalence", "issue importance or urgency", "stakeholder influence, belief, support, or opposition", "causality", "corpus completeness", "two-release trend or forecast" ], "question_answered": "What changed between the archived v7.27 and v7.28 governed relationship snapshots?", "rounding_rule": "Counts remain integers; percentages use four decimal places and retain the displayed numerator and denominator.", "tie_handling": "All exact ties are retained and displayed in deterministic label order.", "unit_of_analysis": "governed relationship", "zero_denominator_handling": "Return NOT_APPLICABLE; never render zero percent." }, { "denominator_definition": "All 1,139 canonical issue accounting rows.", "exclusion_rules": [ "Computational, candidate, or inferred relationships." ], "formula": "covered issues / all canonical issue accounting rows", "inclusion_rules": [ "Canonical issue accounting rows with governed_edge_count greater than zero." ], "input_registries": [ "stakeholder-threading-v728.issue-coverage" ], "limitations": [ "No published edge is not proof of no real-world stakeholder relationship." ], "method_id": "method:v729:issue-coverage", "method_version": "1.0.0", "minimum_publication_threshold": "At least one eligible record unless a method-specific threshold is stated.", "missing_data_handling": "Unknown values are retained as a separate state and are not silently removed.", "numerator_definition": "Distinct issue IDs with at least one published governed edge.", "plain_language_name": "Published issue-edge coverage", "prohibited_interpretations": [ "real-world prevalence", "issue importance or urgency", "stakeholder influence, belief, support, or opposition", "causality", "corpus completeness", "two-release trend or forecast" ], "question_answered": "How many canonical issues have at least one published governed relationship?", "rounding_rule": "Counts remain integers; percentages use four decimal places and retain the displayed numerator and denominator.", "tie_handling": "All exact ties are retained and displayed in deterministic label order.", "unit_of_analysis": "canonical issue", "zero_denominator_handling": "Return NOT_APPLICABLE; never render zero percent." }, { "denominator_definition": "All 287 canonical stakeholder accounting rows.", "exclusion_rules": [ "Computational closeness and unpublished candidates." ], "formula": "covered stakeholders / all canonical stakeholder accounting rows", "inclusion_rules": [ "Canonical stakeholder accounting rows with governed_edge_count greater than zero." ], "input_registries": [ "stakeholder-threading-v728.stakeholder-coverage" ], "limitations": [ "Coverage is sparse and does not measure relevance or influence." ], "method_id": "method:v729:stakeholder-coverage", "method_version": "1.0.0", "minimum_publication_threshold": "At least one eligible record unless a method-specific threshold is stated.", "missing_data_handling": "Unknown values are retained as a separate state and are not silently removed.", "numerator_definition": "Distinct stakeholder IDs with at least one published governed edge.", "plain_language_name": "Published stakeholder-edge coverage", "prohibited_interpretations": [ "real-world prevalence", "issue importance or urgency", "stakeholder influence, belief, support, or opposition", "causality", "corpus completeness", "two-release trend or forecast" ], "question_answered": "How many canonical stakeholders have at least one published governed relationship?", "rounding_rule": "Counts remain integers; percentages use four decimal places and retain the displayed numerator and denominator.", "tie_handling": "All exact ties are retained and displayed in deterministic label order.", "unit_of_analysis": "canonical stakeholder", "zero_denominator_handling": "Return NOT_APPLICABLE; never render zero percent." }, { "denominator_definition": "All 71 published governed relationships.", "exclusion_rules": [ "Unpublished candidates." ], "formula": "count by relationship_type_id / 71 published relationships", "inclusion_rules": [ "Each published relationship exactly once by relationship_type_id." ], "input_registries": [ "stakeholder-threading-v728.relationships", "stakeholder-threading-v728.relationship-types" ], "limitations": [ "Frequency does not establish importance." ], "method_id": "method:v729:relationship-type-composition", "method_version": "1.0.0", "minimum_publication_threshold": "At least one eligible record unless a method-specific threshold is stated.", "missing_data_handling": "Unknown values are retained as a separate state and are not silently removed.", "numerator_definition": "Relationships in a named type.", "plain_language_name": "Relationship-type composition", "prohibited_interpretations": [ "real-world prevalence", "issue importance or urgency", "stakeholder influence, belief, support, or opposition", "causality", "corpus completeness", "two-release trend or forecast" ], "question_answered": "How are the 71 published governed relationships distributed across governed types?", "rounding_rule": "Counts remain integers; percentages use four decimal places and retain the displayed numerator and denominator.", "tie_handling": "All exact ties are retained and displayed in deterministic label order.", "unit_of_analysis": "governed relationship", "zero_denominator_handling": "Return NOT_APPLICABLE; never render zero percent." }, { "denominator_definition": "All 71 published governed relationships.", "exclusion_rules": [ "Unpublished candidates." ], "formula": "count by admission lane / 71 published relationships", "inclusion_rules": [ "Each published relationship exactly once by evidence_directness." ], "input_registries": [ "stakeholder-threading-v728.relationships", "stakeholder-threading-v728.admission-rules" ], "limitations": [ "Formal authority and explicit support are distinct admission rules, not quality scores." ], "method_id": "method:v729:admission-lane-composition", "method_version": "1.0.0", "minimum_publication_threshold": "At least one eligible record unless a method-specific threshold is stated.", "missing_data_handling": "Unknown values are retained as a separate state and are not silently removed.", "numerator_definition": "Relationships in a named admission lane.", "plain_language_name": "Evidence-admission lane composition", "prohibited_interpretations": [ "real-world prevalence", "issue importance or urgency", "stakeholder influence, belief, support, or opposition", "causality", "corpus completeness", "two-release trend or forecast" ], "question_answered": "Which documented evidence-admission lanes admitted the published relationships?", "rounding_rule": "Counts remain integers; percentages use four decimal places and retain the displayed numerator and denominator.", "tie_handling": "All exact ties are retained and displayed in deterministic label order.", "unit_of_analysis": "governed relationship", "zero_denominator_handling": "Return NOT_APPLICABLE; never render zero percent." }, { "denominator_definition": "Published governed relationships for each covered issue.", "exclusion_rules": [ "Candidate and computational relationships." ], "formula": "max(count distinct stakeholder_id grouped by issue_id)", "inclusion_rules": [ "Distinct stakeholder IDs per issue across published governed relationships." ], "input_registries": [ "stakeholder-threading-v728.relationships" ], "limitations": [ "Highest published edge reach is not issue importance." ], "method_id": "method:v729:issue-published-reach", "method_version": "1.0.0", "minimum_publication_threshold": "At least one eligible record unless a method-specific threshold is stated.", "missing_data_handling": "Unknown values are retained as a separate state and are not silently removed.", "numerator_definition": "Distinct governed stakeholder IDs connected to a tied leading issue.", "plain_language_name": "Issue published stakeholder reach", "prohibited_interpretations": [ "real-world prevalence", "issue importance or urgency", "stakeholder influence, belief, support, or opposition", "causality", "corpus completeness", "two-release trend or forecast" ], "question_answered": "Which issue has the largest number of distinct governed stakeholder connections?", "rounding_rule": "Counts remain integers; percentages use four decimal places and retain the displayed numerator and denominator.", "tie_handling": "All exact ties are retained and displayed in deterministic label order.", "unit_of_analysis": "distinct governed stakeholder connection", "zero_denominator_handling": "Return NOT_APPLICABLE; never render zero percent." }, { "denominator_definition": "Published governed relationships for each covered stakeholder.", "exclusion_rules": [ "Candidate and computational relationships." ], "formula": "max(count distinct issue_id grouped by stakeholder_id)", "inclusion_rules": [ "Distinct issue IDs per stakeholder across published governed relationships." ], "input_registries": [ "stakeholder-threading-v728.relationships" ], "limitations": [ "Highest published reach is not influence." ], "method_id": "method:v729:stakeholder-published-reach", "method_version": "1.0.0", "minimum_publication_threshold": "At least one eligible record unless a method-specific threshold is stated.", "missing_data_handling": "Unknown values are retained as a separate state and are not silently removed.", "numerator_definition": "Distinct governed issue IDs connected to a tied leading stakeholder.", "plain_language_name": "Stakeholder published issue reach", "prohibited_interpretations": [ "real-world prevalence", "issue importance or urgency", "stakeholder influence, belief, support, or opposition", "causality", "corpus completeness", "two-release trend or forecast" ], "question_answered": "Which stakeholder has the largest number of distinct governed issue connections?", "rounding_rule": "Counts remain integers; percentages use four decimal places and retain the displayed numerator and denominator.", "tie_handling": "All exact ties are retained and displayed in deterministic label order.", "unit_of_analysis": "distinct governed issue connection", "zero_denominator_handling": "Return NOT_APPLICABLE; never render zero percent." }, { "denominator_definition": "Issue categories represented by that stakeholder's published edges.", "exclusion_rules": [ "Shared keywords, evidence, geography, taxonomy proximity, and Finder similarity." ], "formula": "max(count distinct canonical issue_category_id per stakeholder_id)", "inclusion_rules": [ "A category counts once when a stakeholder has at least one published governed relationship to an issue in that category." ], "input_registries": [ "stakeholder-threading-v728.relationships", "stakeholder-threading-v728.issue-coverage" ], "limitations": [ "The graph covers a minority of canonical issues and stakeholders." ], "method_id": "method:v729:stakeholder-category-span", "method_version": "1.0.0", "minimum_publication_threshold": "At least one eligible record unless a method-specific threshold is stated.", "missing_data_handling": "Unknown values are retained as a separate state and are not silently removed.", "numerator_definition": "Distinct represented issue categories for a tied stakeholder.", "plain_language_name": "Published category bridge span", "prohibited_interpretations": [ "real-world prevalence", "issue importance or urgency", "stakeholder influence, belief, support, or opposition", "causality", "corpus completeness", "two-release trend or forecast" ], "question_answered": "Which stakeholder spans the most represented canonical issue categories through published governed relationships?", "rounding_rule": "Counts remain integers; percentages use four decimal places and retain the displayed numerator and denominator.", "tie_handling": "All exact ties are retained and displayed in deterministic label order.", "unit_of_analysis": "distinct canonical issue category", "zero_denominator_handling": "Return NOT_APPLICABLE; never render zero percent." }, { "denominator_definition": "Stakeholders with published governed edges in the represented corpus.", "exclusion_rules": [ "Shared keywords, geography, evidence, identity, KNN, and Finder similarity." ], "formula": "count distinct stakeholder_id satisfying both category memberships", "inclusion_rules": [ "Stakeholder has at least one published edge in category A and at least one in category B; count distinct stakeholder IDs." ], "input_registries": [ "stakeholder-threading-v728.relationships", "stakeholder-threading-v728.issue-coverage" ], "limitations": [ "A bridge is shared published participation, not causality." ], "method_id": "method:v729:category-pair-bridge", "method_version": "1.0.0", "minimum_publication_threshold": "At least one eligible record unless a method-specific threshold is stated.", "missing_data_handling": "Unknown values are retained as a separate state and are not silently removed.", "numerator_definition": "Distinct stakeholder IDs bridging a tied category pair.", "plain_language_name": "Category-pair bridge stakeholders", "prohibited_interpretations": [ "real-world prevalence", "issue importance or urgency", "stakeholder influence, belief, support, or opposition", "causality", "corpus completeness", "two-release trend or forecast" ], "question_answered": "Which issue-category pair shares the largest number of distinct published bridge stakeholders?", "rounding_rule": "Counts remain integers; percentages use four decimal places and retain the displayed numerator and denominator.", "tie_handling": "All exact ties are retained and displayed in deterministic label order.", "unit_of_analysis": "distinct bridge stakeholder", "zero_denominator_handling": "Return NOT_APPLICABLE; never render zero percent." }, { "denominator_definition": "All distinct evidence records supporting published edges, including missing dates.", "exclusion_rules": [ "Duplicate edge-evidence associations after the first evidence ID occurrence." ], "formula": "count distinct evidence IDs by documented source publication year bucket", "inclusion_rules": [ "Distinct evidence IDs referenced by at least one published governed relationship." ], "input_registries": [ "stakeholder-threading-v728.relationships", "research-v726.evidence-objects", "research-v726.source-governance" ], "limitations": [ "Recency does not establish quality or current legal validity." ], "method_id": "method:v729:evidence-recency-distinct", "method_version": "1.0.0", "minimum_publication_threshold": "At least one eligible record unless a method-specific threshold is stated.", "missing_data_handling": "Missing publication dates remain a separate MISSING_DATE bucket.", "numerator_definition": "Distinct evidence records in the most recent bucket.", "plain_language_name": "Distinct evidence publication recency", "prohibited_interpretations": [ "real-world prevalence", "issue importance or urgency", "stakeholder influence, belief, support, or opposition", "causality", "corpus completeness", "two-release trend or forecast" ], "question_answered": "What publication-date profile appears among distinct evidence records supporting the 71 edges?", "rounding_rule": "Counts remain integers; percentages use four decimal places and retain the displayed numerator and denominator.", "tie_handling": "All exact ties are retained and displayed in deterministic label order.", "unit_of_analysis": "distinct evidence record", "zero_denominator_handling": "Return NOT_APPLICABLE; never render zero percent." }, { "denominator_definition": "All canonical issue IDs in that category.", "exclusion_rules": [ "Categories below 20 issues from headline extremes; they remain in the full table." ], "formula": "covered canonical issues / all canonical issues in category", "inclusion_rules": [ "Categories with at least 20 canonical issues; covered means governed_edge_count greater than zero." ], "input_registries": [ "stakeholder-threading-v728.issue-coverage" ], "limitations": [ "Sparse published-edge coverage is not real-world irrelevance." ], "method_id": "method:v729:category-coverage-rate", "method_version": "1.0.0", "minimum_publication_threshold": "At least 20 canonical issues in the category for headline rate selection.", "missing_data_handling": "Unknown values are retained as a separate state and are not silently removed.", "numerator_definition": "Covered issue IDs in each tied lowest-rate eligible category.", "plain_language_name": "Category published-edge coverage rate", "prohibited_interpretations": [ "real-world prevalence", "issue importance or urgency", "stakeholder influence, belief, support, or opposition", "causality", "corpus completeness", "two-release trend or forecast" ], "question_answered": "Which eligible issue categories have the lowest published-edge coverage?", "rounding_rule": "Counts remain integers; percentages use four decimal places and retain the displayed numerator and denominator.", "tie_handling": "All exact ties are retained and displayed in deterministic label order.", "unit_of_analysis": "canonical issue", "zero_denominator_handling": "Return NOT_APPLICABLE; never render zero percent." }, { "denominator_definition": "All 109 verified evidence records reviewed.", "exclusion_rules": [ "Relationship edges as the counting unit." ], "formula": "49 publishable + 31 insufficient direct evidence + 29 ambiguous relationship type = 109 reviewed evidence records", "inclusion_rules": [ "Existing verified evidence records reviewed for governed relationship publication." ], "input_registries": [ "reports.v728.disposition-accounting-clarification" ], "limitations": [ "The 49 publishable records are not one-to-one with 62 new edges because one record may support multiple edges." ], "method_id": "method:v729:disposition-evidence-records", "method_version": "1.0.0", "minimum_publication_threshold": "At least one eligible record unless a method-specific threshold is stated.", "missing_data_handling": "Unknown values are retained as a separate state and are not silently removed.", "numerator_definition": "Publishable evidence records.", "plain_language_name": "Relationship-publication disposition accounting", "prohibited_interpretations": [ "real-world prevalence", "issue importance or urgency", "stakeholder influence, belief, support, or opposition", "causality", "corpus completeness", "two-release trend or forecast" ], "question_answered": "How were the 109 verified evidence records reviewed for potential v7.28 governed relationship publication classified?", "rounding_rule": "Counts remain integers; percentages use four decimal places and retain the displayed numerator and denominator.", "tie_handling": "All exact ties are retained and displayed in deterministic label order.", "unit_of_analysis": "verified evidence record reviewed for relationship publication", "zero_denominator_handling": "Return NOT_APPLICABLE; never render zero percent." }, { "denominator_definition": "All distinct evidence records supporting published edges.", "exclusion_rules": [ "New scores or inferred authority." ], "formula": "count distinct evidence IDs by existing authority_level", "inclusion_rules": [ "Distinct evidence IDs referenced by a published edge; retain the existing authority classification." ], "input_registries": [ "stakeholder-threading-v728.relationships", "research-v726.evidence-objects", "research-v726.source-governance" ], "limitations": [ "Authority classification does not establish factual certainty." ], "method_id": "method:v729:evidence-authority-distinct", "method_version": "1.0.0", "minimum_publication_threshold": "At least one eligible record unless a method-specific threshold is stated.", "missing_data_handling": "Unknown values are retained as a separate state and are not silently removed.", "numerator_definition": "Distinct evidence records in a named authority class.", "plain_language_name": "Distinct evidence authority", "prohibited_interpretations": [ "real-world prevalence", "issue importance or urgency", "stakeholder influence, belief, support, or opposition", "causality", "corpus completeness", "two-release trend or forecast" ], "question_answered": "What existing authority classifications appear among evidence records supporting published edges?", "rounding_rule": "Counts remain integers; percentages use four decimal places and retain the displayed numerator and denominator.", "tie_handling": "All exact ties are retained and displayed in deterministic label order.", "unit_of_analysis": "distinct evidence record", "zero_denominator_handling": "Return NOT_APPLICABLE; never render zero percent." }, { "denominator_definition": "All 71 published governed relationships.", "exclusion_rules": [ "Coverage-gap issue rows, candidates, inferred links, and computational relationships." ], "formula": "count published governed relationships after conjunctive filter application / 71 published governed relationships", "inclusion_rules": [ "Published governed relationships satisfying every active applicable filter." ], "input_registries": [ "stakeholder-threading-v728.relationships", "stakeholder-threading-v728.issue-coverage", "stakeholder-threading-v728.stakeholder-coverage" ], "limitations": [ "A zero filtered result is not proof that no real-world relationship exists." ], "method_id": "method:v729:active-relationship-view", "method_version": "1.0.0", "minimum_publication_threshold": "Zero-result views remain publishable when the complete active filter state is shown.", "missing_data_handling": "Unknown values are retained as a separate state and are not silently removed.", "numerator_definition": "Matching published governed relationship records.", "plain_language_name": "Active published-relationship view", "prohibited_interpretations": [ "real-world prevalence", "issue importance or urgency", "stakeholder influence, belief, support, or opposition", "causality", "corpus completeness", "two-release trend or forecast" ], "question_answered": "Which published governed relationship records match the active public filter state?", "rounding_rule": "Counts remain integers; percentages use four decimal places and retain the displayed numerator and denominator.", "tie_handling": "All exact ties are retained and displayed in deterministic label order.", "unit_of_analysis": "governed relationship", "zero_denominator_handling": "Return NOT_APPLICABLE; never render zero percent." } ], "releaseVersion": "7.29", "schemaVersion": "wsmusings.insight-methods.v1" }