{
  "schemaVersion": "wsmusings.automated-evidence-assessment.v1",
  "assessmentEngineVersion": "wsmusings.automated-evidence-quality-engine.v1",
  "assessmentId": "assessment:v716:4360e041f3ca02c88f53",
  "assessmentTimestamp": "2026-08-24T00:00:00Z",
  "timestampPolicy": "Release-normalized timestamp; excluded from rule inputs and stable for identical v7.16 builds.",
  "object": {
    "objectId": "issue:academic-freedom-campus-pluralism-and-university-governance",
    "objectType": "ISSUE",
    "title": "Academic Freedom, Campus Pluralism & University Governance",
    "k": null,
    "associatedObjectIds": [
      "issue:academic-freedom-campus-pluralism-and-university-governance"
    ]
  },
  "claim": {
    "claimId": "claim:v715:3a361a24d2d255bb9fb5",
    "exactLanguage": "For faculty at U.S. public universities, the First Amendment protects academic freedom as a constitutional concern, while the application of ordinary public-employee official-duty doctrine to scholarship or teaching remains expressly unresolved by Garcetti.",
    "scope": "U.S. public-university faculty; constitutional doctrine; 1967 through 2026; no claim about private institutions or case-specific outcomes.",
    "exclusions": [
      "constitutional doctrine",
      "1967 through 2026",
      "no claim about private institutions or case-specific outcomes."
    ],
    "jurisdiction": "United States",
    "applicablePopulation": "Faculty at public universities",
    "relevantTimePeriod": "1967-01-23/2026-08-24"
  },
  "evidence": {
    "supportingEvidence": [
      {
        "evidenceRecordId": "evidence:v715:d3ed7c75caada679825f",
        "researchObjectId": "issue:academic-freedom-campus-pluralism-and-university-governance",
        "claimId": "claim:v715:3a361a24d2d255bb9fb5",
        "claimText": "For faculty at U.S. public universities, the First Amendment protects academic freedom as a constitutional concern, while the application of ordinary public-employee official-duty doctrine to scholarship or teaching remains expressly unresolved by Garcetti.",
        "claimScope": "U.S. public-university faculty; constitutional doctrine; 1967 through 2026; no claim about private institutions or case-specific outcomes.",
        "jurisdiction": "United States",
        "applicablePopulation": "Faculty at public universities",
        "relevantTimePeriod": "1967-01-23/2026-08-24",
        "sourceId": "source:v715:cbc51d8c5386869179bc",
        "sourceTitle": "Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 (1967)",
        "sourceAuthorOrIssuingAuthority": "Supreme Court of the United States",
        "publisher": "Library of Congress",
        "sourceType": "CASE",
        "canonicalUrl": "https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep385/usrep385589/usrep385589.pdf",
        "publicationDate": "1967-01-23",
        "accessDate": "2026-08-24",
        "exactLocatorType": "CASE_REPORTER_PAGE",
        "exactLocatorValue": "385 U.S. 603",
        "atomicUrlRationale": "NOT_APPLICABLE",
        "extractOrParaphrase": "Paraphrase: the Court describes academic freedom as a special First Amendment concern and rejects laws casting an orthodoxy over the classroom.",
        "quotationStatus": "PARAPHRASE",
        "evidenceDirection": "CONFIRMATORY",
        "applicability": "APPLICABLE",
        "currency": "CURRENT_AS_PRECEDENT",
        "authorityAssessment": "PRIMARY_BINDING_US_SUPREME_COURT_PRECEDENT",
        "methodologicalLimitation": "Legal authority defines a constitutional rule; it does not measure present-day campus outcomes.",
        "conflictOrContradictionStatus": "NO_MATERIAL_CONTRADICTION_IDENTIFIED_BY_AUTOMATED_PRECHECK",
        "counterevidenceLink": "LINKED_WITHIN_CLAIM_RECORD",
        "reviewerDisposition": "NOT_EVALUATED",
        "reconciliationState": "NOT_EVALUATED",
        "provenance": {
          "authoringOrigin": "SYSTEM_CURATED_FROM_PRIMARY_SOURCE",
          "sourceAccess": "PUBLIC_OFFICIAL_URL",
          "modelOutputUsedAsEvidence": false,
          "automatedAssessmentPerformed": false
        },
        "createdAt": "2026-08-24T00:00:00Z",
        "updatedAt": "2026-08-24T00:00:00Z",
        "schemaVersion": "wsmusings.evidence-pilot.v1"
      }
    ],
    "disconfirmatoryEvidence": [
      {
        "evidenceRecordId": "evidence:v715:00e23273510320ad5df9",
        "researchObjectId": "issue:academic-freedom-campus-pluralism-and-university-governance",
        "claimId": "claim:v715:3a361a24d2d255bb9fb5",
        "claimText": "For faculty at U.S. public universities, the First Amendment protects academic freedom as a constitutional concern, while the application of ordinary public-employee official-duty doctrine to scholarship or teaching remains expressly unresolved by Garcetti.",
        "claimScope": "U.S. public-university faculty; constitutional doctrine; 1967 through 2026; no claim about private institutions or case-specific outcomes.",
        "jurisdiction": "United States",
        "applicablePopulation": "Faculty at public universities",
        "relevantTimePeriod": "1967-01-23/2026-08-24",
        "sourceId": "source:v715:5aaef29106a6f1304f8f",
        "sourceTitle": "Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006)",
        "sourceAuthorOrIssuingAuthority": "Supreme Court of the United States",
        "publisher": "Library of Congress",
        "sourceType": "CASE",
        "canonicalUrl": "https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep547/usrep547410/usrep547410.pdf",
        "publicationDate": "2006-05-30",
        "accessDate": "2026-08-24",
        "exactLocatorType": "CASE_REPORTER_PAGE",
        "exactLocatorValue": "547 U.S. 425",
        "atomicUrlRationale": "NOT_APPLICABLE",
        "extractOrParaphrase": "Paraphrase: the Court reserved whether its official-duty analysis applies to speech related to scholarship or teaching.",
        "quotationStatus": "PARAPHRASE",
        "evidenceDirection": "DISCONFIRMATORY",
        "applicability": "LIMITING",
        "currency": "CURRENT_AS_PRECEDENT",
        "authorityAssessment": "PRIMARY_BINDING_US_SUPREME_COURT_PRECEDENT",
        "methodologicalLimitation": "The decision expressly reserved the scholarship-or-teaching question; it cannot settle every academic-freedom dispute.",
        "conflictOrContradictionStatus": "MATERIAL_LIMITATION_RECORDED",
        "counterevidenceLink": "LINKED_WITHIN_CLAIM_RECORD",
        "reviewerDisposition": "NOT_EVALUATED",
        "reconciliationState": "NOT_EVALUATED",
        "provenance": {
          "authoringOrigin": "SYSTEM_CURATED_FROM_PRIMARY_SOURCE",
          "sourceAccess": "PUBLIC_OFFICIAL_URL",
          "modelOutputUsedAsEvidence": false,
          "automatedAssessmentPerformed": false
        },
        "createdAt": "2026-08-24T00:00:00Z",
        "updatedAt": "2026-08-24T00:00:00Z",
        "schemaVersion": "wsmusings.evidence-pilot.v1"
      }
    ],
    "mixedEvidence": [],
    "contextOnlyEvidence": [],
    "structuredNoMatchRecords": [],
    "exactSourceLocators": [
      {
        "evidenceRecordId": "evidence:v715:d3ed7c75caada679825f",
        "sourceId": "source:v715:cbc51d8c5386869179bc",
        "sourceTitle": "Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 (1967)",
        "locatorType": "CASE_REPORTER_PAGE",
        "locatorValue": "385 U.S. 603",
        "direction": "CONFIRMATORY"
      },
      {
        "evidenceRecordId": "evidence:v715:00e23273510320ad5df9",
        "sourceId": "source:v715:5aaef29106a6f1304f8f",
        "sourceTitle": "Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006)",
        "locatorType": "CASE_REPORTER_PAGE",
        "locatorValue": "547 U.S. 425",
        "direction": "DISCONFIRMATORY"
      }
    ],
    "missingEvidence": [],
    "unresolvedRelationships": 0,
    "unresolvedMechanisms": 0
  },
  "automatedCritic": {
    "status": "AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT_COMPLETE",
    "automatedAssessment": false,
    "findings": [
      {
        "check": "overbreadth",
        "status": "PASS",
        "finding": "The deterministic structural rule found no blocker; this is not human or substantive validation."
      },
      {
        "check": "sourceApplicability",
        "status": "PASS",
        "finding": "The deterministic structural rule found no blocker; this is not human or substantive validation."
      },
      {
        "check": "sourceCurrency",
        "status": "PASS",
        "finding": "The deterministic structural rule found no blocker; this is not human or substantive validation."
      },
      {
        "check": "sourceIndependence",
        "status": "PASS",
        "finding": "The deterministic structural rule found no blocker; this is not human or substantive validation."
      },
      {
        "check": "locatorSufficiency",
        "status": "PASS",
        "finding": "The deterministic structural rule found no blocker; this is not human or substantive validation."
      },
      {
        "check": "conflictingEvidence",
        "status": "PASS",
        "finding": "The deterministic structural rule found no blocker; this is not human or substantive validation."
      },
      {
        "check": "alternativeExplanations",
        "status": "PASS",
        "finding": "The deterministic structural rule found no blocker; this is not human or substantive validation."
      },
      {
        "check": "causalOverstatement",
        "status": "PASS",
        "finding": "The deterministic structural rule found no blocker; this is not human or substantive validation."
      },
      {
        "check": "populationOrJurisdictionMismatch",
        "status": "PASS",
        "finding": "The deterministic structural rule found no blocker; this is not human or substantive validation."
      },
      {
        "check": "unsupportedGeneralization",
        "status": "PASS",
        "finding": "The deterministic structural rule found no blocker; this is not human or substantive validation."
      },
      {
        "check": "missingLimitations",
        "status": "PASS",
        "finding": "The deterministic structural rule found no blocker; this is not human or substantive validation."
      }
    ],
    "semantics": "Deterministic structural checks only; not deterministic evidence assessment, expert approval, truth, reliability, credibility, confidence, or probability."
  },
  "componentMetrics": {
    "locatorCompleteness": {
      "metricId": "LOCATOR_COMPLETENESS",
      "numerator": 2,
      "denominator": 2,
      "range": "0/2–2/2",
      "formula": "count satisfying the named rule / count to which the rule applies",
      "interpretation": "Exact locators present for applicable evidence records.",
      "limitations": "Does not assess whether a source proves the claim.",
      "publicationBlocking": true
    },
    "sourceCoverage": {
      "metricId": "SOURCE_COVERAGE",
      "numerator": 1,
      "denominator": 1,
      "range": "0/1–1/1",
      "formula": "count satisfying the named rule / count to which the rule applies",
      "interpretation": "Presence of at least one confirmatory record.",
      "limitations": "Official status does not automatically confirm a claim.",
      "publicationBlocking": true
    },
    "counterevidenceHandling": {
      "metricId": "COUNTEREVIDENCE_HANDLING",
      "numerator": 1,
      "denominator": 1,
      "range": "0/1–1/1",
      "formula": "count satisfying the named rule / count to which the rule applies",
      "interpretation": "Visibility of at least one countervailing or limiting record.",
      "limitations": "Visibility does not resolve a conflict.",
      "publicationBlocking": true
    },
    "claimToEvidenceTraceability": {
      "metricId": "CLAIM_TO_EVIDENCE_TRACEABILITY",
      "numerator": 2,
      "denominator": 2,
      "range": "0/2–2/2",
      "formula": "count satisfying the named rule / count to which the rule applies",
      "interpretation": "Evidence records refer to the bounded claim.",
      "limitations": "Traceability is not support.",
      "publicationBlocking": true
    },
    "mechanismResolution": {
      "metricId": "MECHANISM_RESOLUTION",
      "numerator": 1,
      "denominator": 1,
      "range": "0/1–1/1",
      "formula": "count satisfying the named rule / count to which the rule applies",
      "interpretation": "Required mechanism resolved or not applicable.",
      "limitations": "Resolution requires qualifying direct evidence.",
      "publicationBlocking": true
    },
    "relationshipResolution": {
      "metricId": "RELATIONSHIP_RESOLUTION",
      "numerator": 1,
      "denominator": 1,
      "range": "0/1–1/1",
      "formula": "count satisfying the named rule / count to which the rule applies",
      "interpretation": "Required relationship resolved or not applicable.",
      "limitations": "Computational closeness cannot resolve relationship type.",
      "publicationBlocking": true
    },
    "missingEvidenceBurden": {
      "metricId": "MISSING_EVIDENCE_BURDEN",
      "value": 0,
      "range": "0–unbounded count",
      "formula": "count of explicitly required evidence records still missing",
      "interpretation": "Higher values indicate more missing mandatory evidence.",
      "limitations": "Absence is not falsity.",
      "publicationBlocking": true
    },
    "criticPrecheckCompletion": {
      "metricId": "CRITIC_PRECHECK_COMPLETION",
      "numerator": 11,
      "denominator": 11,
      "range": "0/11–11/11",
      "formula": "count satisfying the named rule / count to which the rule applies",
      "interpretation": "Deterministic critic checks emitted.",
      "limitations": "Completion is not substantive validation.",
      "publicationBlocking": true
    },
    "publicationBlockCount": {
      "metricId": "PUBLICATION_BLOCK_COUNT",
      "value": 0,
      "range": "0–unbounded count",
      "formula": "count of active blocking-rule results",
      "interpretation": "Zero is required for automated publication readiness.",
      "limitations": "Zero blockers means machine-checkable editorial gates passed, not that the claim is true.",
      "publicationBlocking": true
    }
  },
  "appliedRules": [
    {
      "ruleId": "AEQ-BOUND-001",
      "result": "PASS",
      "basis": "Bounded v7.15 claim fields."
    },
    {
      "ruleId": "AEQ-SOURCE-001",
      "result": "PASS",
      "basis": "1 confirmatory record(s)."
    },
    {
      "ruleId": "AEQ-COUNTER-001",
      "result": "PASS",
      "basis": "1 countervailing/limiting record(s)."
    },
    {
      "ruleId": "AEQ-LOCATOR-001",
      "result": "PASS",
      "basis": "2/2 applicable records have exact locators."
    },
    {
      "ruleId": "AEQ-NOMATCH-001",
      "result": "PASS",
      "basis": "0 structured NO_MATCH record(s)."
    },
    {
      "ruleId": "AEQ-REL-001",
      "result": "PASS",
      "basis": "0 unresolved required relationship(s)."
    },
    {
      "ruleId": "AEQ-MECH-001",
      "result": "PASS",
      "basis": "0 unresolved required mechanism(s)."
    },
    {
      "ruleId": "AEQ-SUBSET-001",
      "result": "PASS",
      "basis": "Not applicable or no required subset evidence missing."
    },
    {
      "ruleId": "AEQ-CRITIC-001",
      "result": "PASS",
      "basis": "11/11 deterministic critic checks emitted findings."
    },
    {
      "ruleId": "AEQ-PROV-001",
      "result": "PASS",
      "basis": "Input hashes and versioned provenance are recorded."
    },
    {
      "ruleId": "AEQ-SCHEMA-001",
      "result": "PASS",
      "basis": "Record produced under the controlled v7.16 schema."
    }
  ],
  "blockingReasons": [],
  "nonBlockingCautions": [],
  "assessmentStatus": "AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT_COMPLETE",
  "finalAutomatedState": "AUTOMATED_PUBLICATION_READY",
  "maturity": {
    "automatedAssessment": "NOT_IN_SCOPE",
    "deterministicallyEvaluated": "NOT_IN_SCOPE",
    "evidenceSupported": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
    "corroborated": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
    "verified": "NOT_ESTABLISHED",
    "truthStatus": "NOT_ASSESSED",
    "expertApproved": "NOT_ASSESSED",
    "independentlyValidated": "NOT_ASSESSED"
  },
  "doesNotEstablish": [
    "FACTUAL_TRUTH",
    "AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT",
    "EXPERT_APPROVAL",
    "INDEPENDENT_VALIDATION",
    "CORROBORATION",
    "VERIFICATION",
    "PROBABILITY",
    "CREDIBILITY_SCORE"
  ],
  "provenance": {
    "inputRecordPath": "data/evidence-pilot-v715/records/issue-academic-freedom-campus-pluralism-and-university-governance.v1.json",
    "inputRecordSha256": "54ae1338f954668389254a42f0a41018f63b40164b0c95918b8c90a6fb5607b9",
    "sourceRegistrySha256": "520ad2593bae82edd9184e185e3666252b0cf454519cb5a8e1557c2ba0636fb3",
    "subsetRegistrySha256": "04f0168a0c51f89ae4e3ed62d236c205c82372b9de0afe1c0a25a1bc569bb57d",
    "sourceRecordIdentifiers": [
      "source:v715:5aaef29106a6f1304f8f",
      "source:v715:cbc51d8c5386869179bc"
    ],
    "ruleVersion": "wsmusings.automated-evidence-quality-engine.v1",
    "schemaVersion": "wsmusings.automated-evidence-assessment.v1",
    "predecessorCommit": "d6ff87ab1311b5dffca1c42b5e68b5758498f327",
    "predecessorTree": "b3ccdb348d3195a0ecee3263eb1ee36d265660fc"
  },
  "outputIdentity": "b958a5597a6f39e13d94e7f6ab081fadaa2d9f0ed4a054936b77d6d040408d98"
}