{
  "schemaVersion": "wsmusings.evidence-pilot.v1",
  "object": {
    "objectId": "k2:ac85406ad32a4a9a",
    "objectType": "INTERSECTIONAL_THEME",
    "title": "Institutional Racially Unequal Protection × Racially Unequal Institutional Access",
    "route": "/research/objects/?group=k2%3Aac85406ad32a4a9a",
    "k": 2,
    "priority": "P1_CRITICAL_RESEARCH_QUEUE",
    "predecessorReadinessState": "NEEDS_LOCATOR",
    "predecessorEvidenceGaps": [
      "SOURCE_WITHOUT_LOCATOR",
      "INSUFFICIENT_CORROBORATION",
      "UNRESOLVED_MECHANISM"
    ]
  },
  "selectionReason": "One of exactly five P1 objects in the sealed v7.14 priority shard; no substitution or expansion.",
  "claim": {
    "claimId": "claim:v715:fb8c554a764e65115f4e",
    "text": "Title VI prohibits intentional race, color, or national-origin exclusion from or unequal treatment in federally assisted programs, but Alexander v. Sandoval limits private enforcement by recognizing no private right of action to enforce disparate-impact regulations under Title VI.",
    "scope": "Federally assisted U.S. programs; statutory doctrine and private enforcement; 1964 through 2026; no finding about any named institution or claimant.",
    "jurisdiction": "United States",
    "applicablePopulation": "People participating in or seeking benefits from federally assisted programs",
    "relevantTimePeriod": "1964-07-02/2026-08-24",
    "bounded": true,
    "atomic": true,
    "assessable": true,
    "advocacyLanguage": false,
    "unsupportedNumericPercentage": false,
    "authoringOrigin": "SYSTEM_DRAFT_FOR_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT"
  },
  "evidenceRecords": [
    {
      "evidenceRecordId": "evidence:v715:e06f45e602e272078fb7",
      "researchObjectId": "k2:ac85406ad32a4a9a",
      "claimId": "claim:v715:fb8c554a764e65115f4e",
      "claimText": "Title VI prohibits intentional race, color, or national-origin exclusion from or unequal treatment in federally assisted programs, but Alexander v. Sandoval limits private enforcement by recognizing no private right of action to enforce disparate-impact regulations under Title VI.",
      "claimScope": "Federally assisted U.S. programs; statutory doctrine and private enforcement; 1964 through 2026; no finding about any named institution or claimant.",
      "jurisdiction": "United States",
      "applicablePopulation": "People participating in or seeking benefits from federally assisted programs",
      "relevantTimePeriod": "1964-07-02/2026-08-24",
      "sourceId": "source:v715:f4efaae0a84012b6cc8c",
      "sourceTitle": "42 U.S.C. § 2000d (Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)",
      "sourceAuthorOrIssuingAuthority": "United States Congress",
      "publisher": "U.S. Government Publishing Office",
      "sourceType": "STATUTE",
      "canonicalUrl": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2023-title42/pdf/USCODE-2023-title42-chap21-subchapV.pdf",
      "publicationDate": "2023",
      "accessDate": "2026-08-24",
      "exactLocatorType": "STATUTORY_PROVISION",
      "exactLocatorValue": "42 U.S.C. § 2000d; 2023 U.S. Code, Title 42, page 5220",
      "atomicUrlRationale": "NOT_APPLICABLE",
      "extractOrParaphrase": "Paraphrase: no person may, on specified protected grounds, be excluded from participation in, denied benefits of, or subjected to discrimination under federally assisted programs.",
      "quotationStatus": "PARAPHRASE",
      "evidenceDirection": "CONFIRMATORY",
      "applicability": "APPLICABLE",
      "currency": "CURRENT_AS_CODIFIED",
      "authorityAssessment": "PRIMARY_FEDERAL_STATUTE",
      "methodologicalLimitation": "The statutory prohibition does not by itself establish a violation in a particular institution or program.",
      "conflictOrContradictionStatus": "NO_MATERIAL_CONTRADICTION_IDENTIFIED_BY_AUTOMATED_PRECHECK",
      "counterevidenceLink": "LINKED_WITHIN_CLAIM_RECORD",
      "reviewerDisposition": "NOT_EVALUATED",
      "reconciliationState": "NOT_EVALUATED",
      "provenance": {
        "authoringOrigin": "SYSTEM_CURATED_FROM_PRIMARY_SOURCE",
        "sourceAccess": "PUBLIC_OFFICIAL_URL",
        "modelOutputUsedAsEvidence": false,
        "automatedAssessmentPerformed": false
      },
      "createdAt": "2026-08-24T00:00:00Z",
      "updatedAt": "2026-08-24T00:00:00Z",
      "schemaVersion": "wsmusings.evidence-pilot.v1"
    },
    {
      "evidenceRecordId": "evidence:v715:2bfe9a5e201195c5fedb",
      "researchObjectId": "k2:ac85406ad32a4a9a",
      "claimId": "claim:v715:fb8c554a764e65115f4e",
      "claimText": "Title VI prohibits intentional race, color, or national-origin exclusion from or unequal treatment in federally assisted programs, but Alexander v. Sandoval limits private enforcement by recognizing no private right of action to enforce disparate-impact regulations under Title VI.",
      "claimScope": "Federally assisted U.S. programs; statutory doctrine and private enforcement; 1964 through 2026; no finding about any named institution or claimant.",
      "jurisdiction": "United States",
      "applicablePopulation": "People participating in or seeking benefits from federally assisted programs",
      "relevantTimePeriod": "1964-07-02/2026-08-24",
      "sourceId": "source:v715:0ecf438f5e0c54a4447f",
      "sourceTitle": "Alexander v. Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275 (2001)",
      "sourceAuthorOrIssuingAuthority": "Supreme Court of the United States",
      "publisher": "Library of Congress",
      "sourceType": "CASE",
      "canonicalUrl": "https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep532/usrep532275/usrep532275.pdf",
      "publicationDate": "2001-04-24",
      "accessDate": "2026-08-24",
      "exactLocatorType": "CASE_REPORTER_PAGE",
      "exactLocatorValue": "532 U.S. 293",
      "atomicUrlRationale": "NOT_APPLICABLE",
      "extractOrParaphrase": "Paraphrase: the Court held that Title VI contains no private right of action to enforce disparate-impact regulations.",
      "quotationStatus": "PARAPHRASE",
      "evidenceDirection": "DISCONFIRMATORY",
      "applicability": "LIMITING",
      "currency": "CURRENT_AS_PRECEDENT",
      "authorityAssessment": "PRIMARY_BINDING_US_SUPREME_COURT_PRECEDENT",
      "methodologicalLimitation": "The holding concerns a private right of action and does not negate administrative enforcement or prove equal access.",
      "conflictOrContradictionStatus": "MATERIAL_LIMITATION_RECORDED",
      "counterevidenceLink": "LINKED_WITHIN_CLAIM_RECORD",
      "reviewerDisposition": "NOT_EVALUATED",
      "reconciliationState": "NOT_EVALUATED",
      "provenance": {
        "authoringOrigin": "SYSTEM_CURATED_FROM_PRIMARY_SOURCE",
        "sourceAccess": "PUBLIC_OFFICIAL_URL",
        "modelOutputUsedAsEvidence": false,
        "automatedAssessmentPerformed": false
      },
      "createdAt": "2026-08-24T00:00:00Z",
      "updatedAt": "2026-08-24T00:00:00Z",
      "schemaVersion": "wsmusings.evidence-pilot.v1"
    }
  ],
  "relationshipAdjudication": {
    "unresolvedAffectingObject": 0,
    "resolved": 0,
    "status": "NO_UNRESOLVED_RELATIONSHIP_TYPE_IN_V714_PACKET",
    "controlledValue": "NOT_APPLICABLE",
    "basis": "Sealed v7.14 signalComponents.unresolvedRelationshipTypes equals 0.",
    "sourceIds": [],
    "reviewerState": "SYSTEM_PRECHECK_NOT_HUMAN",
    "limitations": "No substantive relationship-type finding was made."
  },
  "mechanismAdjudication": {
    "unresolvedAffectingObject": 1,
    "resolved": 0,
    "status": "UNRESOLVED_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT_REQUIRED",
    "controlledValue": "UNKNOWN",
    "basis": "Official sources address bounded controls or legal rules but do not establish the intersectional mechanism.",
    "sourceIds": [
      "source:v715:f4efaae0a84012b6cc8c",
      "source:v715:0ecf438f5e0c54a4447f"
    ],
    "reviewerState": "SYSTEM_PRECHECK_NOT_HUMAN",
    "limitations": "Computational closeness and priority do not establish mechanism or causation."
  },
  "critic": {
    "stage": "AUTOMATED_PRECHECK_COMPLETE_SECONDARY_CRITIC_PENDING",
    "authoringOrigin": "SYSTEM_DERIVED",
    "evidenceAssessor": false,
    "checks": {
      "overbreadth": {
        "status": "REQUIRES_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT",
        "note": "Mechanical completeness check passed; substantive judgment was not performed."
      },
      "sourceApplicability": {
        "status": "REQUIRES_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT",
        "note": "Mechanical completeness check passed; substantive judgment was not performed."
      },
      "sourceCurrency": {
        "status": "REQUIRES_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT",
        "note": "Mechanical completeness check passed; substantive judgment was not performed."
      },
      "sourceIndependence": {
        "status": "REQUIRES_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT",
        "note": "Mechanical completeness check passed; substantive judgment was not performed."
      },
      "locatorSufficiency": {
        "status": "REQUIRES_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT",
        "note": "Mechanical completeness check passed; substantive judgment was not performed."
      },
      "conflictingEvidence": {
        "status": "REQUIRES_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT",
        "note": "Mechanical completeness check passed; substantive judgment was not performed."
      },
      "alternativeExplanations": {
        "status": "REQUIRES_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT",
        "note": "Mechanical completeness check passed; substantive judgment was not performed."
      },
      "causalOverstatement": {
        "status": "REQUIRES_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT",
        "note": "Mechanical completeness check passed; substantive judgment was not performed."
      },
      "populationOrJurisdictionMismatch": {
        "status": "REQUIRES_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT",
        "note": "Mechanical completeness check passed; substantive judgment was not performed."
      },
      "unsupportedGeneralization": {
        "status": "REQUIRES_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT",
        "note": "Mechanical completeness check passed; substantive judgment was not performed."
      },
      "missingLimitations": {
        "status": "REQUIRES_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT",
        "note": "Mechanical completeness check passed; substantive judgment was not performed."
      }
    },
    "disposition": "NOT_EVALUATED",
    "allowedReconciliationStates": [
      "ACCEPTED_WITH_LIMITATIONS",
      "REVISE_CLAIM",
      "MORE_EVIDENCE_REQUIRED",
      "CONFLICT_UNRESOLVED",
      "REJECTED",
      "NOT_EVALUATED"
    ]
  },
  "reconciliation": {
    "state": "NOT_EVALUATED",
    "evidenceAssessor": false,
    "note": "Automated precheck cannot select a substantive reconciliation disposition."
  },
  "maturity": {
    "publicationStatus": "NOT_ELIGIBLE",
    "evidenceStatus": "EVIDENCE_ASSIGNED_AWAITING_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT",
    "reviewStatus": "NOT_EVALUATED",
    "corroborationStatus": "NOT_CORROBORATED",
    "verificationStatus": "NOT_VERIFIED",
    "researchMaturity": "READY_FOR_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT",
    "candidatePlacementIsApproval": false
  },
  "publicationGate": {
    "eligible": false,
    "blockers": [
      "CRITIC_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT_INCOMPLETE",
      "RECONCILIATION_INCOMPLETE",
      "REQUIRED_AUTOMATED_ASSESSMENT_ABSENT",
      "UNRESOLVED_REQUIRED_MECHANISM"
    ],
    "authorizationToPublish": false
  },
  "provenance": {
    "predecessorCommit": "5a8301fffed3d3e0326e6dfddd44d968c8b5516c",
    "predecessorTree": "4df502a55c6d9473937e18192b7adf0133d113da",
    "buildScript": "tools/build_v715_evidence_pilot.js",
    "generatedAt": "2026-08-24T00:00:00Z",
    "automatedAssessmentPerformed": false
  }
}