{
  "appliedRules": [
    "CEV-SEARCH-REQUIRED-001",
    "CEV-SEARCH-COMPLETE-001",
    "CEV-ROLE-001",
    "CEV-CONTRADICTION-001",
    "CEV-MIXED-001",
    "CEV-DEDUP-001",
    "CEV-PUBLICATION-001"
  ],
  "assessmentTimestamp": "2026-08-24T00:00:00Z",
  "assessmentVersion": "7.18",
  "boundaries": {
    "aggregateConfidenceScoreProduced": false,
    "aggregateProbabilityScoreProduced": false,
    "aggregateTruthScoreProduced": false,
    "majorityVoteUsed": false,
    "noMatchIsPositiveEvidence": false,
    "noMatchMeansNoCounterevidenceExists": false,
    "sourceCountVoteUsed": false,
    "weightedVoteUsed": false
  },
  "claim": {
    "applicablePopulation": "People participating in or seeking benefits from federally assisted programs",
    "claimId": "claim:v715:fb8c554a764e65115f4e",
    "exactLanguage": "Title VI prohibits intentional race, color, or national-origin exclusion from or unequal treatment in federally assisted programs, but Alexander v. Sandoval limits private enforcement by recognizing no private right of action to enforce disparate-impact regulations under Title VI.",
    "exclusions": [
      "statutory doctrine and private enforcement",
      "1964 through 2026",
      "no finding about any named institution or claimant."
    ],
    "jurisdiction": "United States",
    "relevantTimePeriod": "1964-07-02/2026-08-24",
    "scope": "Federally assisted U.S. programs; statutory doctrine and private enforcement; 1964 through 2026; no finding about any named institution or claimant."
  },
  "completenessIntegration": {
    "counterevidenceBlockingCodes": [],
    "counterevidenceRequirementStatus": "SATISFIED",
    "existingBlockingCodes": [
      "MECHANISM_UNRESOLVED"
    ],
    "sourceCompletenessJsonRoute": "/data/evidence-completeness-v717/records/k2-ac85406ad32a4a9a.v1.json",
    "sourceCompletenessRecordId": "3b3debc2dd484ed7610fa95b21d4eacaac5b78acc93393931c0752a84451b917"
  },
  "engineVersion": "wsmusings.counterevidence-engine.v1",
  "evidenceRoles": {
    "counts": {
      "confirmatory": 1,
      "contextOnly": 0,
      "disconfirmatory": 1,
      "mixed": 0,
      "noMatch": 0
    },
    "records": {
      "CONFIRMATORY": [
        {
          "canonicalUrl": "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2023-title42/pdf/USCODE-2023-title42-chap21-subchapV.pdf",
          "claimId": "claim:v715:fb8c554a764e65115f4e",
          "evidenceRecordId": "evidence:v715:e06f45e602e272078fb7",
          "finding": "Paraphrase: no person may, on specified protected grounds, be excluded from participation in, denied benefits of, or subjected to discrimination under federally assisted programs.",
          "limitation": "The statutory prohibition does not by itself establish a violation in a particular institution or program.",
          "locatorType": "STATUTORY_PROVISION",
          "locatorValue": "42 U.S.C. § 2000d; 2023 U.S. Code, Title 42, page 5220",
          "role": "CONFIRMATORY",
          "sourceId": "source:v715:f4efaae0a84012b6cc8c",
          "sourceTitle": "42 U.S.C. § 2000d (Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)"
        }
      ],
      "CONTEXT_ONLY": [],
      "DISCONFIRMATORY": [
        {
          "canonicalUrl": "https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep532/usrep532275/usrep532275.pdf",
          "claimId": "claim:v715:fb8c554a764e65115f4e",
          "evidenceRecordId": "evidence:v715:2bfe9a5e201195c5fedb",
          "finding": "Paraphrase: the Court held that Title VI contains no private right of action to enforce disparate-impact regulations.",
          "limitation": "The holding concerns a private right of action and does not negate administrative enforcement or prove equal access.",
          "locatorType": "CASE_REPORTER_PAGE",
          "locatorValue": "532 U.S. 293",
          "role": "DISCONFIRMATORY",
          "sourceId": "source:v715:0ecf438f5e0c54a4447f",
          "sourceTitle": "Alexander v. Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275 (2001)"
        }
      ],
      "MIXED": [],
      "NO_MATCH": []
    },
    "semantics": {
      "CONFIRMATORY": "Supports some proposition or required evidentiary element.",
      "CONTEXT_ONLY": "Relevant background that does not satisfy confirmatory or disconfirmatory requirements.",
      "DISCONFIRMATORY": "Materially weighs against the bounded proposition or required condition.",
      "MIXED": "Contains materially relevant supportive and contrary material in one governed record.",
      "NO_MATCH": "A recorded bounded search did not yield qualifying evidence; this is distinct from no search and from proof that no contrary evidence exists."
    }
  },
  "object": {
    "associatedObjectIds": [
      "k2:ac85406ad32a4a9a"
    ],
    "k": 2,
    "objectId": "k2:ac85406ad32a4a9a",
    "objectType": "INTERSECTIONAL_THEME",
    "title": "Institutional Racially Unequal Protection × Racially Unequal Institutional Access"
  },
  "outputIdentity": "26317d89b15e60bf2d5fb5173a37ade963f00f96e6323864cfc058e4f62ce77e",
  "provenance": {
    "completenessRecordPath": "data/evidence-completeness-v717/records/k2-ac85406ad32a4a9a.v1.json",
    "completenessRecordSha256": "0fd33a1e2e49800578493655b13abe5754ab9ca98acf8621c0dba211e77bf9bb",
    "inputAssessmentPath": "data/evidence-quality-v716/records/k2-ac85406ad32a4a9a.v1.json",
    "inputAssessmentSha256": "cbbef9c3bed7899fa8348ebc67a8d744e9cc534b8837425748530eef9c6d71c2",
    "predecessorCandidateSha256": "60343ffa8e55ac438ca5a66dbe747d4bc55fbd54064b1e94257a4708d4f53122",
    "predecessorCommit": "b120c36cfba79d113f6a2a52691965d80fb3b839",
    "predecessorTree": "1924549c51fbf9c53e98a935cc91624c796814fb"
  },
  "publicationConsequence": {
    "blockers": [
      {
        "code": "MECHANISM_UNRESOLVED",
        "count": 1,
        "explanation": "General object evidence cannot substitute for unresolved mechanism evidence. Failure: MECHANISM_UNRESOLVED.",
        "requirementId": "ECR-MECHANISM-001"
      }
    ],
    "derivedPublicationState": "PUBLICATION_BLOCKED",
    "disconfirmatoryEvidenceAutomaticallyBlocks": false,
    "effect": "PUBLICATION_REMAINS_BLOCKED_BY_EXISTING_REQUIREMENTS",
    "priorPublicationState": "PUBLICATION_BLOCKED",
    "requirementRulesControlPublication": true
  },
  "result": {
    "contradiction": {
      "affectedRequirementIds": [
        "ECR-ROLE-001"
      ],
      "confirmatoryEvidenceIds": [
        "evidence:v715:e06f45e602e272078fb7"
      ],
      "disconfirmatoryEvidenceIds": [
        "evidence:v715:2bfe9a5e201195c5fedb"
      ],
      "sourceCountVoteUsed": false,
      "state": "CONTRADICTORY_EVIDENCE",
      "winnerSelected": false
    },
    "mixedFindings": [],
    "noDisconfirmatoryEvidenceSemantics": "Absence of identified disconfirmatory evidence in the recorded scope is not proof that none exists.",
    "resultState": "CONTRADICTORY_EVIDENCE",
    "resultingEvidenceIds": [
      "evidence:v715:2bfe9a5e201195c5fedb"
    ]
  },
  "schemaVersion": "wsmusings.counterevidence-search-result.v1",
  "searchRecordId": "countersearch:v718:e75f8843ba6b23b878c7",
  "searchRequirement": {
    "applicabilityRule": "Required when ECR-COUNTER-001 is mandatory and applicable for the assessed object.",
    "performed": true,
    "queryOrRetrievalIdentity": "914366c8a09d7f1710f62be84ee3a215e2eeba256b2b5f4d8cf0b2a32fda47b1",
    "required": true,
    "requirementId": "ECR-COUNTER-001",
    "scope": {
      "limitations": [
        "The bounded pilot record is not a comprehensive literature review; absence of identified contrary evidence is not proof that none exists."
      ],
      "scopeType": "GOVERNED_ASSOCIATED_EVIDENCE_SET",
      "scopes": [
        "Bounded claim claim:v715:fb8c554a764e65115f4e and its governed associated evidence set."
      ],
      "sourceClassesSearched": [
        "CASE"
      ],
      "strategies": [
        "Inspect governed evidence assigned a non-confirmatory or limiting role for the bounded claim."
      ]
    },
    "searchStatus": "SEARCH_COMPLETE",
    "status": "SATISFIED"
  },
  "timestampPolicy": "Release-normalized timestamp; excluded from rule inputs and deterministic output identity."
}