{
  "appliedRules": [
    "CEV-SEARCH-REQUIRED-001",
    "CEV-SEARCH-COMPLETE-001",
    "CEV-ROLE-001",
    "CEV-CONTRADICTION-001",
    "CEV-MIXED-001",
    "CEV-DEDUP-001",
    "CEV-PUBLICATION-001"
  ],
  "assessmentTimestamp": "2026-08-24T00:00:00Z",
  "assessmentVersion": "7.18",
  "boundaries": {
    "aggregateConfidenceScoreProduced": false,
    "aggregateProbabilityScoreProduced": false,
    "aggregateTruthScoreProduced": false,
    "majorityVoteUsed": false,
    "noMatchIsPositiveEvidence": false,
    "noMatchMeansNoCounterevidenceExists": false,
    "sourceCountVoteUsed": false,
    "weightedVoteUsed": false
  },
  "claim": {
    "applicablePopulation": "Faculty at public universities",
    "claimId": "claim:v715:3a361a24d2d255bb9fb5",
    "exactLanguage": "For faculty at U.S. public universities, the First Amendment protects academic freedom as a constitutional concern, while the application of ordinary public-employee official-duty doctrine to scholarship or teaching remains expressly unresolved by Garcetti.",
    "exclusions": [
      "constitutional doctrine",
      "1967 through 2026",
      "no claim about private institutions or case-specific outcomes."
    ],
    "jurisdiction": "United States",
    "relevantTimePeriod": "1967-01-23/2026-08-24",
    "scope": "U.S. public-university faculty; constitutional doctrine; 1967 through 2026; no claim about private institutions or case-specific outcomes."
  },
  "completenessIntegration": {
    "counterevidenceBlockingCodes": [],
    "counterevidenceRequirementStatus": "SATISFIED",
    "existingBlockingCodes": [],
    "sourceCompletenessJsonRoute": "/data/evidence-completeness-v717/records/issue-academic-freedom-campus-pluralism-and-university-governance.v1.json",
    "sourceCompletenessRecordId": "c05a5cb797bd271107a7863dc8fa5936b085e76cf5bcf353bd2e125cbfda2ba7"
  },
  "engineVersion": "wsmusings.counterevidence-engine.v1",
  "evidenceRoles": {
    "counts": {
      "confirmatory": 1,
      "contextOnly": 0,
      "disconfirmatory": 1,
      "mixed": 0,
      "noMatch": 0
    },
    "records": {
      "CONFIRMATORY": [
        {
          "canonicalUrl": "https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep385/usrep385589/usrep385589.pdf",
          "claimId": "claim:v715:3a361a24d2d255bb9fb5",
          "evidenceRecordId": "evidence:v715:d3ed7c75caada679825f",
          "finding": "Paraphrase: the Court describes academic freedom as a special First Amendment concern and rejects laws casting an orthodoxy over the classroom.",
          "limitation": "Legal authority defines a constitutional rule; it does not measure present-day campus outcomes.",
          "locatorType": "CASE_REPORTER_PAGE",
          "locatorValue": "385 U.S. 603",
          "role": "CONFIRMATORY",
          "sourceId": "source:v715:cbc51d8c5386869179bc",
          "sourceTitle": "Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 (1967)"
        }
      ],
      "CONTEXT_ONLY": [],
      "DISCONFIRMATORY": [
        {
          "canonicalUrl": "https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/usrep/usrep547/usrep547410/usrep547410.pdf",
          "claimId": "claim:v715:3a361a24d2d255bb9fb5",
          "evidenceRecordId": "evidence:v715:00e23273510320ad5df9",
          "finding": "Paraphrase: the Court reserved whether its official-duty analysis applies to speech related to scholarship or teaching.",
          "limitation": "The decision expressly reserved the scholarship-or-teaching question; it cannot settle every academic-freedom dispute.",
          "locatorType": "CASE_REPORTER_PAGE",
          "locatorValue": "547 U.S. 425",
          "role": "DISCONFIRMATORY",
          "sourceId": "source:v715:5aaef29106a6f1304f8f",
          "sourceTitle": "Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006)"
        }
      ],
      "MIXED": [],
      "NO_MATCH": []
    },
    "semantics": {
      "CONFIRMATORY": "Supports some proposition or required evidentiary element.",
      "CONTEXT_ONLY": "Relevant background that does not satisfy confirmatory or disconfirmatory requirements.",
      "DISCONFIRMATORY": "Materially weighs against the bounded proposition or required condition.",
      "MIXED": "Contains materially relevant supportive and contrary material in one governed record.",
      "NO_MATCH": "A recorded bounded search did not yield qualifying evidence; this is distinct from no search and from proof that no contrary evidence exists."
    }
  },
  "object": {
    "associatedObjectIds": [
      "issue:academic-freedom-campus-pluralism-and-university-governance"
    ],
    "k": null,
    "objectId": "issue:academic-freedom-campus-pluralism-and-university-governance",
    "objectType": "ISSUE",
    "title": "Academic Freedom, Campus Pluralism & University Governance"
  },
  "outputIdentity": "bcf3f4fbf7b811bfa15db4bbb10f098b01219811825a18633f254424e97d7594",
  "provenance": {
    "completenessRecordPath": "data/evidence-completeness-v717/records/issue-academic-freedom-campus-pluralism-and-university-governance.v1.json",
    "completenessRecordSha256": "c04129f326d2fc1e78f269cb0f672acc728688ecba3e12bcb148bf1cff6c1764",
    "inputAssessmentPath": "data/evidence-quality-v716/records/issue-academic-freedom-campus-pluralism-and-university-governance.v1.json",
    "inputAssessmentSha256": "5f0627bf8c54a1ec94e017ae0e7166276c9070b0b99e7d49a1c89807a51fa392",
    "predecessorCandidateSha256": "60343ffa8e55ac438ca5a66dbe747d4bc55fbd54064b1e94257a4708d4f53122",
    "predecessorCommit": "b120c36cfba79d113f6a2a52691965d80fb3b839",
    "predecessorTree": "1924549c51fbf9c53e98a935cc91624c796814fb"
  },
  "publicationConsequence": {
    "blockers": [],
    "derivedPublicationState": "AUTOMATED_PUBLICATION_READY",
    "disconfirmatoryEvidenceAutomaticallyBlocks": false,
    "effect": "PUBLICATION_READY_WITH_CONTRADICTORY_EVIDENCE_DISCLOSED",
    "priorPublicationState": "AUTOMATED_PUBLICATION_READY",
    "requirementRulesControlPublication": true
  },
  "result": {
    "contradiction": {
      "affectedRequirementIds": [
        "ECR-ROLE-001"
      ],
      "confirmatoryEvidenceIds": [
        "evidence:v715:d3ed7c75caada679825f"
      ],
      "disconfirmatoryEvidenceIds": [
        "evidence:v715:00e23273510320ad5df9"
      ],
      "sourceCountVoteUsed": false,
      "state": "CONTRADICTORY_EVIDENCE",
      "winnerSelected": false
    },
    "mixedFindings": [],
    "noDisconfirmatoryEvidenceSemantics": "Absence of identified disconfirmatory evidence in the recorded scope is not proof that none exists.",
    "resultState": "CONTRADICTORY_EVIDENCE",
    "resultingEvidenceIds": [
      "evidence:v715:00e23273510320ad5df9"
    ]
  },
  "schemaVersion": "wsmusings.counterevidence-search-result.v1",
  "searchRecordId": "countersearch:v718:271d9c596efae90d8e53",
  "searchRequirement": {
    "applicabilityRule": "Required when ECR-COUNTER-001 is mandatory and applicable for the assessed object.",
    "performed": true,
    "queryOrRetrievalIdentity": "12603c1beb9107d27bd907c05dc87351b9da5e6f7161056c136ae35ac287bb7e",
    "required": true,
    "requirementId": "ECR-COUNTER-001",
    "scope": {
      "limitations": [
        "The bounded pilot record is not a comprehensive literature review; absence of identified contrary evidence is not proof that none exists."
      ],
      "scopeType": "GOVERNED_ASSOCIATED_EVIDENCE_SET",
      "scopes": [
        "Bounded claim claim:v715:3a361a24d2d255bb9fb5 and its governed associated evidence set."
      ],
      "sourceClassesSearched": [
        "CASE"
      ],
      "strategies": [
        "Inspect governed evidence assigned a non-confirmatory or limiting role for the bounded claim."
      ]
    },
    "searchStatus": "SEARCH_COMPLETE",
    "status": "SATISFIED"
  },
  "timestampPolicy": "Release-normalized timestamp; excluded from rule inputs and deterministic output identity."
}