{ "canonical_route": "/research/objects/procurement-trust-editorial-independence/", "change_tracking": { "canonical_corpus_change_count": 0, "changes": [ { "change_class": "APPLICATION_PRESENTATION", "change_id": "change:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:created", "change_type": "FLAGSHIP_RESEARCH_OBJECT_CREATED", "statement": "v7.39 assembles predecessor compiler records into the existing Lighthouse Research Object architecture without changing the canonical corpus." } ], "stable_identifier": "research-object:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence" }, "citation": { "canonical_url": "https://wsmusings.com/research/objects/procurement-trust-editorial-independence/", "preferred": "WS Musings. “Procurement, Public Trust & Editorial Independence.” Flagship Lighthouse Research Object, v7.39 development candidate (2026-08-30). https://wsmusings.com/research/objects/procurement-trust-editorial-independence/", "source_citation_count": 0 }, "content_sha256": "74af3ab86e512ab3e0fd499d7815f617b06bc42b762144a481a51693b251f942", "contradictions": [ { "alternative_id": "alternative:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:01", "evidence_state": "UNSUPPORTED", "statement": "Metadata proximity without a real-world relationship.", "test": "Seek records or a matched case that distinguishes this explanation from the proposed mechanism." }, { "alternative_id": "alternative:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:02", "evidence_state": "UNSUPPORTED", "statement": "Parallel but independent mechanisms.", "test": "Seek records or a matched case that distinguishes this explanation from the proposed mechanism." }, { "alternative_id": "alternative:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:03", "evidence_state": "UNSUPPORTED", "statement": "A third factor accounting for the apparent association.", "test": "Seek records or a matched case that distinguishes this explanation from the proposed mechanism." } ], "decision_lens": { "comparison_design": "Match jurisdiction or institution, population, period, and observable consequence while selecting a case where the proposed implementation process is absent.", "comparison_route": "/research/intersections/#issues=issue:corporate-public-affairs-trust,issue:institutional-procurement-supply-chain,issue:research-editorial-independence&lens=compare&question=question:v737:044968ada150125af019", "limitation": "The design does not rank cases, recommend action, or imply a comparative result.", "negative_or_contrasting_case": { "case_id": "negative-case:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:matched-absence", "design": "Match jurisdiction or institution, population, period, and observable consequence while selecting a case where the proposed implementation process is absent.", "evidence_ids": [], "limitation": "No negative case has been selected or evidenced; matching quality remains unknown.", "route": "/research/intersections/#issues=issue:corporate-public-affairs-trust,issue:institutional-procurement-supply-chain,issue:research-editorial-independence&lens=compare&question=question:v737:044968ada150125af019", "status": "COMPARATIVE_DESIGN_IN_PROGRESS" }, "status": "COMPARATIVE_DESIGN_IN_PROGRESS" }, "disconfirmation_plan": { "decision_rule": "Weaken or reject the proposed mechanism if a disconfirming observation is supported by scoped primary records or a valid matched comparison.", "observations": [ "The proposed process is absent in the fixed jurisdiction or institution.", "The constituent issues do not overlap in population, institution, jurisdiction, or time.", "A matched comparison shows the same pattern without the proposed process.", "Primary records support an alternative explanation more directly than the proposed mechanism." ], "plan_id": "disconfirmation:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence", "precommitment": "Jurisdiction, institution, population, timeframe, outcome, and matching rules must be recorded before adjudication.", "status": "EVIDENCE_ACQUISITION_INCOMPLETE" }, "evidence_objects": [ { "allowed_public_language": "The application assembled a bounded question from governed metadata.", "blocked_public_language": "The intersection or proposed mechanism is proven.", "claim_id": "claim:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:scope", "claim_text": "The v7.38 governed metadata profile joins 3 constituent issue records into a bounded research question.", "claim_type": "COMPILER_BACKGROUND", "contrary_evidence": "Not applicable to the existence of the application records; their real-world implications remain untested.", "evidence_state": "BACKGROUND_CONTEXT", "exact_locators": [ "/research/insights/?view=research-leverage&profile=leverage:v738:0ccc283df61addae03c6", "/data/research-leverage-v738/research-leverage-profiles.v1.json" ], "limitations": "Metadata association does not establish a real-world relationship, exposure, consequence, causation, intent, or culpability.", "source_ids": [ "leverage:v738:0ccc283df61addae03c6", "question:v737:044968ada150125af019", "k3:a47f14d5210e9d5377a2" ], "supporting_evidence": "The deterministic compiler and profile register establish only this application-level assembly." }, { "allowed_public_language": "The object proposes a mechanism for investigation.", "blocked_public_language": "The mechanism is a finding or confirmed causal explanation.", "claim_id": "claim:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:mechanism", "claim_text": "A procurement or contract process could connect the constituent issues through the displayed mechanism chain.", "claim_type": "MECHANISM_HYPOTHESIS", "contrary_evidence": "Not yet acquired; plausible alternatives are recorded separately.", "evidence_state": "HYPOTHESIS_ONLY", "exact_locators": [], "limitations": "Jurisdiction, institution, population, timeframe, process, and consequence remain to be fixed and evidenced.", "source_ids": [], "supporting_evidence": "None acquired for the proposed real-world mechanism." }, { "allowed_public_language": "A negative-case comparison is planned.", "blocked_public_language": "The comparison supports or defeats the mechanism before records are acquired.", "claim_id": "claim:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:comparison", "claim_text": "A matched contrasting case can test whether the proposed process is necessary to the observed pattern.", "claim_type": "COMPARATIVE_DESIGN", "contrary_evidence": "A matched case showing the same pattern without the process would weaken the hypothesis.", "evidence_state": "BLOCKED_PENDING_EVIDENCE", "exact_locators": [], "limitations": "Comparability criteria and records must be fixed before results may be interpreted.", "source_ids": [], "supporting_evidence": "No case evidence acquired." } ], "evidence_state": { "acquired_primary_record_count": 0, "claim_evidence_matrix": [ { "allowed_public_language": "The application assembled a bounded question from governed metadata.", "blocked_public_language": "The intersection or proposed mechanism is proven.", "claim_id": "claim:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:scope", "claim_text": "The v7.38 governed metadata profile joins 3 constituent issue records into a bounded research question.", "claim_type": "COMPILER_BACKGROUND", "contrary_evidence": "Not applicable to the existence of the application records; their real-world implications remain untested.", "evidence_state": "BACKGROUND_CONTEXT", "exact_locators": [ "/research/insights/?view=research-leverage&profile=leverage:v738:0ccc283df61addae03c6", "/data/research-leverage-v738/research-leverage-profiles.v1.json" ], "limitations": "Metadata association does not establish a real-world relationship, exposure, consequence, causation, intent, or culpability.", "source_ids": [ "leverage:v738:0ccc283df61addae03c6", "question:v737:044968ada150125af019", "k3:a47f14d5210e9d5377a2" ], "supporting_evidence": "The deterministic compiler and profile register establish only this application-level assembly." }, { "allowed_public_language": "The object proposes a mechanism for investigation.", "blocked_public_language": "The mechanism is a finding or confirmed causal explanation.", "claim_id": "claim:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:mechanism", "claim_text": "A procurement or contract process could connect the constituent issues through the displayed mechanism chain.", "claim_type": "MECHANISM_HYPOTHESIS", "contrary_evidence": "Not yet acquired; plausible alternatives are recorded separately.", "evidence_state": "HYPOTHESIS_ONLY", "exact_locators": [], "limitations": "Jurisdiction, institution, population, timeframe, process, and consequence remain to be fixed and evidenced.", "source_ids": [], "supporting_evidence": "None acquired for the proposed real-world mechanism." }, { "allowed_public_language": "A negative-case comparison is planned.", "blocked_public_language": "The comparison supports or defeats the mechanism before records are acquired.", "claim_id": "claim:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:comparison", "claim_text": "A matched contrasting case can test whether the proposed process is necessary to the observed pattern.", "claim_type": "COMPARATIVE_DESIGN", "contrary_evidence": "A matched case showing the same pattern without the process would weaken the hypothesis.", "evidence_state": "BLOCKED_PENDING_EVIDENCE", "exact_locators": [], "limitations": "Comparability criteria and records must be fixed before results may be interpreted.", "source_ids": [], "supporting_evidence": "No case evidence acquired." } ], "interpretation": "Application provenance is available; no real-world mechanism or finding is verified.", "issue_verified": false, "primary_record_acquisition_manifest": [ { "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "record_locator": "", "scope": "Named jurisdiction, institution, population, and review period to be fixed before request or search.", "source_class": "law or regulation", "status": "NOT_LOCATED", "support_direction": "NOT_EVALUATED", "task_id": "acquisition:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:01" }, { "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "record_locator": "", "scope": "Named jurisdiction, institution, population, and review period to be fixed before request or search.", "source_class": "agency guidance", "status": "NOT_LOCATED", "support_direction": "NOT_EVALUATED", "task_id": "acquisition:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:02" }, { "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "record_locator": "", "scope": "Named jurisdiction, institution, population, and review period to be fixed before request or search.", "source_class": "administrative record", "status": "REQUEST_PLANNED", "support_direction": "NOT_EVALUATED", "task_id": "acquisition:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:03" }, { "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "record_locator": "", "scope": "Named jurisdiction, institution, population, and review period to be fixed before request or search.", "source_class": "audit", "status": "NOT_LOCATED", "support_direction": "NOT_EVALUATED", "task_id": "acquisition:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:04" }, { "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "record_locator": "", "scope": "Named jurisdiction, institution, population, and review period to be fixed before request or search.", "source_class": "dataset", "status": "NOT_LOCATED", "support_direction": "NOT_EVALUATED", "task_id": "acquisition:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:05" }, { "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "record_locator": "", "scope": "Named jurisdiction, institution, population, and review period to be fixed before request or search.", "source_class": "complaint or appeal", "status": "REQUEST_PLANNED", "support_direction": "NOT_EVALUATED", "task_id": "acquisition:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:06" }, { "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "record_locator": "", "scope": "Named jurisdiction, institution, population, and review period to be fixed before request or search.", "source_class": "official correspondence", "status": "REQUEST_PLANNED", "support_direction": "NOT_EVALUATED", "task_id": "acquisition:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:07" }, { "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "record_locator": "", "scope": "Named jurisdiction, institution, population, and review period to be fixed before request or search.", "source_class": "public-record request", "status": "REQUEST_PLANNED", "support_direction": "NOT_EVALUATED", "task_id": "acquisition:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:08" } ], "public_states": [ "RESEARCH_OBJECT_SCOPED", "EVIDENCE_ACQUISITION_INCOMPLETE", "COMPARATIVE_DESIGN_IN_PROGRESS", "MECHANISM_NOT_ESTABLISHED", "QUESTION_REMAINS_OPEN" ] }, "executive_summary": { "inferred_calculated": [ { "classification": "DETERMINISTIC_CORPUS_CALCULATION", "statement": "The object contains 3 constituent issue identifiers and 3 pairwise metadata relationships." } ], "known_evidenced": [ { "classification": "BACKGROUND_CONTEXT", "source_ids": [ "leverage:v738:0ccc283df61addae03c6", "question:v737:044968ada150125af019" ], "statement": "The bounded question and source profile are reproducible application records." } ], "unknown_missing": [ { "classification": "QUESTION_REMAINS_OPEN", "statement": "The proposed mechanism, stakeholder exposure, observable consequence, and remedy pathway remain unverified." } ] }, "exports": { "brief": "/downloads/research-objects/v7.39/procurement-trust-editorial-independence.brief.md", "citation": "/downloads/research-objects/v7.39/procurement-trust-editorial-independence.citation.txt", "csv": "/downloads/research-objects/v7.39/procurement-trust-editorial-independence.csv", "json": "/api/v1/research-objects/procurement-trust-editorial-independence.json" }, "gaps": [ { "gap_id": "gap:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:scope", "gap_type": "NAMED_SCOPE", "state": "EVIDENCE_ACQUISITION_INCOMPLETE", "statement": "Jurisdiction, institution, population, and timeframe remain to be fixed." }, { "gap_id": "gap:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:records", "gap_type": "PRIMARY_RECORDS", "state": "EVIDENCE_ACQUISITION_INCOMPLETE", "statement": "No primary records have been acquired for the proposed mechanism." }, { "gap_id": "gap:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:comparison", "gap_type": "NEGATIVE_CASE", "state": "COMPARATIVE_DESIGN_IN_PROGRESS", "statement": "The contrasting case and matching criteria remain to be evidenced." } ], "generated_at": "2026-08-30T00:00:00Z", "intersectionality": { "constituent_issue_ids": [ "issue:corporate-public-affairs-trust", "issue:institutional-procurement-supply-chain", "issue:research-editorial-independence" ], "limitation": "Issue co-selection and pairwise enumeration do not establish identity, experience, representation, impact, or causation.", "mechanism_chain": { "arrows": [ { "basis": "Metadata-derived routing hypothesis; no primary record has been acquired for this arrow.", "from": "FORMAL_RULE_OR_MATERIAL_CONDITION", "status": "PROPOSED", "to": "RESPONSIBLE_INSTITUTIONAL_ROLE" }, { "basis": "Metadata-derived routing hypothesis; no primary record has been acquired for this arrow.", "from": "RESPONSIBLE_INSTITUTIONAL_ROLE", "status": "PROPOSED", "to": "IMPLEMENTATION_PROCESS" }, { "basis": "Metadata-derived routing hypothesis; no primary record has been acquired for this arrow.", "from": "IMPLEMENTATION_PROCESS", "status": "PROPOSED", "to": "STAKEHOLDER_EXPOSURE" }, { "basis": "Metadata-derived routing hypothesis; no primary record has been acquired for this arrow.", "from": "STAKEHOLDER_EXPOSURE", "status": "UNKNOWN", "to": "OBSERVABLE_CONSEQUENCE" }, { "basis": "Metadata-derived routing hypothesis; no primary record has been acquired for this arrow.", "from": "OBSERVABLE_CONSEQUENCE", "status": "UNKNOWN", "to": "REVIEW_CORRECTION_OR_REMEDY_PATHWAY" } ], "chain_id": "mechanism-chain:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence", "overall_state": "MECHANISM_NOT_ESTABLISHED", "stages": [ { "stage": "FORMAL_RULE_OR_MATERIAL_CONDITION", "text": "A procurement or contract rule or material condition is in scope but has not yet been fixed to a named jurisdiction or institution." }, { "stage": "RESPONSIBLE_INSTITUTIONAL_ROLE", "text": "An implementing institutional role must be identified from primary records; no institution is inferred from taxonomy labels." }, { "stage": "IMPLEMENTATION_PROCESS", "text": "The proposed procurement or contract process is a research hypothesis awaiting documentary evidence." }, { "stage": "STAKEHOLDER_EXPOSURE", "text": "People subject to or dependent on the process may encounter the implementation pathway; exposure is not established." }, { "stage": "OBSERVABLE_CONSEQUENCE", "text": "A measurable consequence must be defined before evidence collection and tested against a matched comparison." }, { "stage": "REVIEW_CORRECTION_OR_REMEDY_PATHWAY", "text": "The review, correction, appeal, oversight, or remedy route must be located and assessed." } ] }, "pairwise_relationships": [ { "evidence_ids": [], "issue_ids": [ "issue:corporate-public-affairs-trust", "issue:institutional-procurement-supply-chain" ], "state": "PROPOSED_METADATA_RELATIONSHIP" }, { "evidence_ids": [], "issue_ids": [ "issue:corporate-public-affairs-trust", "issue:research-editorial-independence" ], "state": "PROPOSED_METADATA_RELATIONSHIP" }, { "evidence_ids": [], "issue_ids": [ "issue:institutional-procurement-supply-chain", "issue:research-editorial-independence" ], "state": "PROPOSED_METADATA_RELATIONSHIP" } ] }, "issue": { "cardinality": 3, "category_corridor": "Capital, Philanthropy & Institutional Stewardship × Media, Narrative & Information Integrity", "central_question": "Within a jurisdiction and review period fixed before evidence collection, under what conditions might a proposed procurement or contract connect Corporate Public Affairs & Institutional Trust and Institutional Procurement & Supply-Chain Responsibility and Research & Editorial Independence for people subject to or dependent on that process, compared with a matched institution or jurisdiction where the connection is not observed, and what evidence would weaken or defeat that explanation?", "constituent_issue_ids": [ "issue:corporate-public-affairs-trust", "issue:institutional-procurement-supply-chain", "issue:research-editorial-independence" ], "jurisdiction": "TO_BE_FIXED_BEFORE_EVIDENCE_COLLECTION", "mechanism_hypothesis": "A proposed procurement or contract process may connect the scoped issues; the mechanism is not established.", "question_id": "question:v737:044968ada150125af019", "question_title": "Procurement or contract across Corporate Public Affairs & Institutional Trust and Institutional Procurement & Supply-Chain Responsibility and Research & Editorial Independence", "timeframe": "TO_BE_FIXED_BEFORE_EVIDENCE_COLLECTION", "why_unresolved": "No scoped primary records, exact real-world locators, named institutional roles, or completed comparison have been acquired for this object." }, "methodology": { "admission_gates": { "ALTERNATIVE_EXPLANATION": true, "BOUNDED_CENTRAL_QUESTION": true, "COMPARISON_ROUTE": true, "DISCONFIRMATION_PLAN": true, "EVIDENCE_ACQUISITION_ROUTE": true, "READY_FOR_OBJECT_SCOPING": true, "REPRODUCIBLE_PROVENANCE": true, "SPECIFIC_MECHANISM_HYPOTHESIS": true, "STAKEHOLDER_ROLE_SPECIFICITY": true }, "brief_warning": "This brief assembles a research question, evidence records, comparisons, and limitations. It does not convert an open question or proposed mechanism into a verified finding.", "method_id": "method:v739:flagship-research-object-assembly", "method_route": "/research/objects/methodology/", "statement": "A deterministic selection from READY_FOR_OBJECT_SCOPING profiles, mapped into the existing Lighthouse Research Object schema and section flow." }, "object_id": "research-object:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence", "object_status": "RESEARCH_OBJECT_SCOPED", "object_type": "LIGHTHOUSE_RESEARCH_OBJECT", "observatory": { "evidence_asymmetry": "UNKNOWN_WITHOUT_ACQUIRED_RECORDS", "limitations": [ "This metadata calculation cannot establish causation, intent, coordination, culpability, legal equivalence, stakeholder impact, or a verified intersection. Independent evidence, counterevidence, and deterministic evidence assessment are required.", "Jurisdiction, institution, affected population, and review period must be fixed before evidence collection.", "The proposed mechanism is a routing hypothesis derived from supplied metadata and is not a factual or causal finding.", "Research Leverage dimensions are independent scoping signals; no overall score or rank is produced." ], "prior_work_register": { "located_records": [], "searched_sources": [], "state": "SYSTEMATIC_COVERAGE_REVIEW_NOT_COMPLETED", "statement": "Systematic coverage review was not completed; no novelty, first-study, or absence-of-prior-work claim is made." }, "profile_id": "leverage:v738:0ccc283df61addae03c6", "profile_route": "/research/insights/?view=research-leverage&profile=leverage:v738:0ccc283df61addae03c6" }, "provenance": { "compiler": "/tools/build_v739_research_objects.py", "profile_input_digest": "386bf3db24351ba1d4cd30a7e56d98f542c54988d7f5116719246d17ca698f23", "profile_output_digest": "759d9fc0eb909078a9772dc7385492183187eb17f04def0f3a47cd5151270cb6", "reproduction_command": "python3 tools/build_v739_research_objects.py", "source_candidate_ids": [ "k3:a47f14d5210e9d5377a2" ], "source_profile_id": "leverage:v738:0ccc283df61addae03c6", "source_question_id": "question:v737:044968ada150125af019", "source_register": "/data/research-leverage-v738/research-leverage-profiles.v1.json" }, "related_research": [ "question:v737:044968ada150125af019", "leverage:v738:0ccc283df61addae03c6", "k3:a47f14d5210e9d5377a2" ], "release": { "application": "7.39", "corpus": "7.28", "development_candidate": true, "production_authorized": false }, "reproducible_export_identity": { "export_id": "export:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:e0f465c1532b08c68ffa", "generation_command": "python3 tools/build_v739_research_objects.py", "schema_version": "wsmusings.research-object.v1", "source_profile_digest": "759d9fc0eb909078a9772dc7385492183187eb17f04def0f3a47cd5151270cb6" }, "schema_version": "wsmusings.research-object.v1", "slug": "procurement-trust-editorial-independence", "stakeholder_relationships": [ { "evidence_ids": [], "limitation": "No named entity, affiliation, representation, position, or impact is inferred.", "named_entity": null, "relationship_state": "PROPOSED", "role_class": "AFFECTED", "role_description": "People subject to or dependent on the process", "role_id": "role:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:affected" }, { "evidence_ids": [], "limitation": "No named entity, affiliation, representation, position, or impact is inferred.", "named_entity": null, "relationship_state": "PROPOSED", "role_class": "IMPLEMENTING", "role_description": "Institutional role responsible for applying the relevant process", "role_id": "role:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:implementing" }, { "evidence_ids": [], "limitation": "No named entity, affiliation, representation, position, or impact is inferred.", "named_entity": null, "relationship_state": "UNKNOWN", "role_class": "REGULATING", "role_description": "Role responsible for governing or constraining implementation", "role_id": "role:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:regulating" }, { "evidence_ids": [], "limitation": "No named entity, affiliation, representation, position, or impact is inferred.", "named_entity": null, "relationship_state": "UNKNOWN", "role_class": "REVIEWING", "role_description": "Role that reviews decisions, records, or outcomes", "role_id": "role:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:reviewing" }, { "evidence_ids": [], "limitation": "No named entity, affiliation, representation, position, or impact is inferred.", "named_entity": null, "relationship_state": "UNKNOWN", "role_class": "FUNDING", "role_description": "Role that authorizes or supplies material resources", "role_id": "role:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:funding" }, { "evidence_ids": [], "limitation": "No named entity, affiliation, representation, position, or impact is inferred.", "named_entity": null, "relationship_state": "UNKNOWN", "role_class": "OVERSIGHT", "role_description": "Role responsible for audit, monitoring, or public accountability", "role_id": "role:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:oversight" }, { "evidence_ids": [], "limitation": "No named entity, affiliation, representation, position, or impact is inferred.", "named_entity": null, "relationship_state": "UNKNOWN", "role_class": "REMEDY", "role_description": "Role able to correct, reverse, appeal, or remedy an adverse consequence", "role_id": "role:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:remedy" } ], "title": "Procurement, Public Trust & Editorial Independence", "workspace_components": [ { "component_id": "component:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:central-question", "key": "central-question", "title": "Central question" }, { "component_id": "component:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:selected-claims", "key": "selected-claims", "title": "Selected claims" }, { "component_id": "component:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:selected-evidence", "key": "selected-evidence", "title": "Selected evidence and claim states" }, { "component_id": "component:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:comparison-design", "key": "comparison-design", "title": "Comparison design" }, { "component_id": "component:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:stakeholder-role-matrix", "key": "stakeholder-role-matrix", "title": "Stakeholder-role matrix" }, { "component_id": "component:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:alternative-explanations", "key": "alternative-explanations", "title": "Alternative explanations" }, { "component_id": "component:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:disconfirmation-plan", "key": "disconfirmation-plan", "title": "Disconfirmation plan" }, { "component_id": "component:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:source-acquisition-tasks", "key": "source-acquisition-tasks", "title": "Source-acquisition tasks" }, { "component_id": "component:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:limitations", "key": "limitations", "title": "Limitations" }, { "component_id": "component:v739:procurement-trust-editorial-independence:notes", "key": "notes", "title": "Private notes" } ] }