{ "alternative_explanation_ledger": [ { "alternative_id": "alternative:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:01", "distinguishing_evidence": "Pre-register a variable or matched case able to separate this explanation from the proposed mechanism.", "explanation": "selection effects", "status": "UNTESTED" }, { "alternative_id": "alternative:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:02", "distinguishing_evidence": "Pre-register a variable or matched case able to separate this explanation from the proposed mechanism.", "explanation": "reporting differences", "status": "UNTESTED" }, { "alternative_id": "alternative:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:03", "distinguishing_evidence": "Pre-register a variable or matched case able to separate this explanation from the proposed mechanism.", "explanation": "resource variation", "status": "UNTESTED" }, { "alternative_id": "alternative:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:04", "distinguishing_evidence": "Pre-register a variable or matched case able to separate this explanation from the proposed mechanism.", "explanation": "legal eligibility", "status": "UNTESTED" }, { "alternative_id": "alternative:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:05", "distinguishing_evidence": "Pre-register a variable or matched case able to separate this explanation from the proposed mechanism.", "explanation": "administrative capacity", "status": "UNTESTED" }, { "alternative_id": "alternative:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:06", "distinguishing_evidence": "Pre-register a variable or matched case able to separate this explanation from the proposed mechanism.", "explanation": "geographic composition", "status": "UNTESTED" }, { "alternative_id": "alternative:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:07", "distinguishing_evidence": "Pre-register a variable or matched case able to separate this explanation from the proposed mechanism.", "explanation": "data quality", "status": "UNTESTED" }, { "alternative_id": "alternative:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:08", "distinguishing_evidence": "Pre-register a variable or matched case able to separate this explanation from the proposed mechanism.", "explanation": "policy timing", "status": "UNTESTED" }, { "alternative_id": "alternative:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:09", "distinguishing_evidence": "Pre-register a variable or matched case able to separate this explanation from the proposed mechanism.", "explanation": "unrelated institutional change", "status": "UNTESTED" }, { "alternative_id": "alternative:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:10", "distinguishing_evidence": "Pre-register a variable or matched case able to separate this explanation from the proposed mechanism.", "explanation": "measurement definition", "status": "UNTESTED" }, { "alternative_id": "alternative:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:11", "distinguishing_evidence": "Pre-register a variable or matched case able to separate this explanation from the proposed mechanism.", "explanation": "sample composition", "status": "UNTESTED" } ], "assessment_change_register": [ { "automatic_adjudication": false, "change": "STRENGTHEN", "required_evidence": "Multiple exact primary records document consecutive mechanism stages and the same directional pattern appears in both comparisons." }, { "automatic_adjudication": false, "change": "NARROW", "required_evidence": "Records support the pathway only for a specified role, institution, jurisdiction, period, or policy state." }, { "automatic_adjudication": false, "change": "WEAKEN", "required_evidence": "A valid matched comparison shows the same pattern without the proposed process or records support an alternative more directly." }, { "automatic_adjudication": false, "change": "REVERSE", "required_evidence": "Reliable records show the proposed directional relationship is opposite within the pre-registered scope." }, { "automatic_adjudication": false, "change": "DEFEAT", "required_evidence": "The proposed process is absent, temporally impossible, or contradicted by controlling records in the fixed scope." } ], "causation_status": "NOT_ESTABLISHED", "central_question": "Within a jurisdiction and review period fixed before evidence collection, under what conditions might a proposed classification process connect Algorithmic Profiling and Associational Profiling and Political or Ideological Profiling and Racial Profiling and Religious Profiling for people subject to or dependent on that process, compared with a matched institution or jurisdiction where the connection is not observed, and what evidence would weaken or defeat that explanation?", "change_log": [ { "change_class": "APPLICATION_RESEARCH_PACKAGE", "change_id": "change:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:package-created", "date": "2026-08-30T00:00:00Z", "statement": "Created an evidence-incomplete comparative package from the sealed v7.39 Research Object; no evidence state was promoted." } ], "claim_evidence_matrix": [ { "allowed_public_language": "The application assembled a bounded question from governed metadata.", "blocked_public_language": "The intersection or proposed mechanism is proven.", "claim_id": "claim:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:scope", "claim_text": "The v7.38 governed metadata profile joins 5 constituent issue records into a bounded research question.", "claim_type": "COMPILER_BACKGROUND", "contrary_evidence": "Not applicable to the existence of the application records; their real-world implications remain untested.", "evidence_state": "BACKGROUND_CONTEXT", "exact_locators": [ "/research/insights/?view=research-leverage&profile=leverage:v738:44b07eb365e0ae1b73e1", "/data/research-leverage-v738/research-leverage-profiles.v1.json" ], "limitations": "Metadata association does not establish a real-world relationship, exposure, consequence, causation, intent, or culpability.", "source_ids": [ "leverage:v738:44b07eb365e0ae1b73e1", "question:v737:01dcab42290640ba838a", "k5:7b3ae9a9bfcbb2f60204" ], "supporting_evidence": "The deterministic compiler and profile register establish only this application-level assembly." }, { "allowed_public_language": "The object proposes a mechanism for investigation.", "blocked_public_language": "The mechanism is a finding or confirmed causal explanation.", "claim_id": "claim:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:mechanism", "claim_text": "A classification process process could connect the constituent issues through the displayed mechanism chain.", "claim_type": "MECHANISM_HYPOTHESIS", "contrary_evidence": "Not yet acquired; plausible alternatives are recorded separately.", "evidence_state": "HYPOTHESIS_ONLY", "exact_locators": [], "limitations": "Jurisdiction, institution, population, timeframe, process, and consequence remain to be fixed and evidenced.", "source_ids": [], "supporting_evidence": "None acquired for the proposed real-world mechanism." }, { "allowed_public_language": "A negative-case comparison is planned.", "blocked_public_language": "The comparison supports or defeats the mechanism before records are acquired.", "claim_id": "claim:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:comparison", "claim_text": "A matched contrasting case can test whether the proposed process is necessary to the observed pattern.", "claim_type": "COMPARATIVE_DESIGN", "contrary_evidence": "A matched case showing the same pattern without the process would weaken the hypothesis.", "evidence_state": "BLOCKED_PENDING_EVIDENCE", "exact_locators": [], "limitations": "Comparability criteria and records must be fixed before results may be interpreted.", "source_ids": [], "supporting_evidence": "No case evidence acquired." } ], "comparative_designs": [ { "alternative_explanations": [ "selection effects", "reporting differences", "resource variation", "administrative capacity", "measurement definition" ], "comparison_id": "comparison:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:eligibility-classification", "comparison_type": "SIMILAR_POPULATIONS_DIFFERENT_ELIGIBILITY_CLASSIFICATIONS", "data_limitations": "No case, primary record, dataset, denominator, or measurement definition has yet been acquired; comparability remains untested.", "denominators": [ "all in-scope decisions or encounters in each case", "all people meeting the pre-registered eligibility rule" ], "disconfirming_pattern": "The same pattern appears across classifications, or the pattern tracks a non-classification variable more closely.", "exclusions": [ "records outside the pre-registered period", "unmatched aggregates", "records whose population or decision unit cannot be resolved" ], "expected_mechanism": "If classification drives the proposed pathway, process and remedy measures should differ after other pre-registered variables are held constant.", "inclusions": [ "records inside the fixed jurisdiction, institution, period, role, and policy state", "records with a stable join key or documented aggregate denominator" ], "institution": "Comparable implementing units within the same institutional system", "jurisdiction": "One jurisdiction, to be named before acquisition", "policy_state": "Classification A versus Classification B under the same surrounding rule", "population_or_stakeholder_role": "People in comparable roles who differ only on a documented eligibility classification", "status": "DESIGN_READY_EVIDENCE_NOT_ACQUIRED", "timeframe": "A review period fixed before acquisition, with aligned start and end dates for both cases", "unit_of_analysis": "one administrative classification decision", "variables": [ "implementation_process_present", "eligible_population_denominator", "observable_consequence_count", "remedy_use_count" ] }, { "alternative_explanations": [ "selection effects", "reporting differences", "resource variation", "administrative capacity", "measurement definition" ], "comparison_id": "comparison:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:safeguard-presence", "comparison_type": "INSTITUTION_WITH_SAFEGUARD_COMPARABLE_INSTITUTION_WITHOUT_SAFEGUARD", "data_limitations": "No case, primary record, dataset, denominator, or measurement definition has yet been acquired; comparability remains untested.", "denominators": [ "all in-scope decisions or encounters in each case", "all people meeting the pre-registered eligibility rule" ], "disconfirming_pattern": "No pathway difference appears, or the apparent difference predates the safeguard or follows unrelated institutional change.", "exclusions": [ "records outside the pre-registered period", "unmatched aggregates", "records whose population or decision unit cannot be resolved" ], "expected_mechanism": "A functioning safeguard should alter notice, review, correction, or outcome pathways if the proposed mechanism is operative.", "inclusions": [ "records inside the fixed jurisdiction, institution, period, role, and policy state", "records with a stable join key or documented aggregate denominator" ], "institution": "One implementing institution with a documented safeguard and one comparable institution without it", "jurisdiction": "Matched jurisdictions or one shared jurisdiction", "policy_state": "Documented safeguard present versus safeguard absent", "population_or_stakeholder_role": "People subject to the same classification function", "status": "DESIGN_READY_EVIDENCE_NOT_ACQUIRED", "timeframe": "A review period fixed before acquisition, with aligned start and end dates for both cases", "unit_of_analysis": "one classification process during the fixed review period", "variables": [ "implementation_process_present", "eligible_population_denominator", "observable_consequence_count", "remedy_use_count" ] } ], "content_sha256": "d9c0e228bbd72115844e81ca2ed36c95c16dd59ca2c70ec08270326117618397", "data_table_specification": [ { "denominator": "eligible_population_denominator", "join_key": "case-period", "jurisdiction": "FIX_BEFORE_ACQUISITION", "known_bias": "Selection, reporting, access, administrative, temporal, and measurement bias remain unassessed.", "meaning": "Whether the pre-registered implementation process is documented", "missing_value_treatment": "Keep missing as UNKNOWN; do not coerce to zero or absence.", "population": "FIX_ROLE_AND_ELIGIBILITY_BEFORE_ACQUISITION", "source": "IMPLEMENTATION_RECORD", "time_period": "FIX_BEFORE_ACQUISITION", "transformation": "No transformation until source schema and denominator are documented.", "unit": "binary case indicator", "validation_rule": "Reject rows outside fixed scope; report missingness; reconcile aggregates to the documented denominator.", "variable_name": "implementation_process_present" }, { "denominator": "self-defining eligible population count", "join_key": "jurisdiction-institution-period-role", "jurisdiction": "FIX_BEFORE_ACQUISITION", "known_bias": "Selection, reporting, access, administrative, temporal, and measurement bias remain unassessed.", "meaning": "All people or decisions meeting the fixed eligibility rule", "missing_value_treatment": "Keep missing as UNKNOWN; do not coerce to zero or absence.", "population": "FIX_ROLE_AND_ELIGIBILITY_BEFORE_ACQUISITION", "source": "FORMAL_RULE and administrative dataset", "time_period": "FIX_BEFORE_ACQUISITION", "transformation": "No transformation until source schema and denominator are documented.", "unit": "count", "validation_rule": "Reject rows outside fixed scope; report missingness; reconcile aggregates to the documented denominator.", "variable_name": "eligible_population_denominator" }, { "denominator": "eligible_population_denominator", "join_key": "jurisdiction-institution-period-outcome", "jurisdiction": "FIX_BEFORE_ACQUISITION", "known_bias": "Selection, reporting, access, administrative, temporal, and measurement bias remain unassessed.", "meaning": "Count of the pre-registered observable consequence", "missing_value_treatment": "Keep missing as UNKNOWN; do not coerce to zero or absence.", "population": "FIX_ROLE_AND_ELIGIBILITY_BEFORE_ACQUISITION", "source": "MEASURED_OUTCOME", "time_period": "FIX_BEFORE_ACQUISITION", "transformation": "No transformation until source schema and denominator are documented.", "unit": "count", "validation_rule": "Reject rows outside fixed scope; report missingness; reconcile aggregates to the documented denominator.", "variable_name": "observable_consequence_count" }, { "denominator": "eligible_population_denominator", "join_key": "jurisdiction-institution-period-remedy", "jurisdiction": "FIX_BEFORE_ACQUISITION", "known_bias": "Selection, reporting, access, administrative, temporal, and measurement bias remain unassessed.", "meaning": "Count of in-scope remedy initiations", "missing_value_treatment": "Keep missing as UNKNOWN; do not coerce to zero or absence.", "population": "FIX_ROLE_AND_ELIGIBILITY_BEFORE_ACQUISITION", "source": "REMEDY_USE", "time_period": "FIX_BEFORE_ACQUISITION", "transformation": "No transformation until source schema and denominator are documented.", "unit": "count", "validation_rule": "Reject rows outside fixed scope; report missingness; reconcile aggregates to the documented denominator.", "variable_name": "remedy_use_count" }, { "denominator": "eligible_population_denominator", "join_key": "jurisdiction-institution-period-remedy-outcome", "jurisdiction": "FIX_BEFORE_ACQUISITION", "known_bias": "Selection, reporting, access, administrative, temporal, and measurement bias remain unassessed.", "meaning": "Count of completed remedy outcomes by recorded disposition", "missing_value_treatment": "Keep missing as UNKNOWN; do not coerce to zero or absence.", "population": "FIX_ROLE_AND_ELIGIBILITY_BEFORE_ACQUISITION", "source": "REMEDY_OUTCOME", "time_period": "FIX_BEFORE_ACQUISITION", "transformation": "No transformation until source schema and denominator are documented.", "unit": "count", "validation_rule": "Reject rows outside fixed scope; report missingness; reconcile aggregates to the documented denominator.", "variable_name": "remedy_outcome_count" } ], "disconfirming_evidence_plan": { "decision_rule": "Weaken or reject the proposed mechanism if a disconfirming observation is supported by scoped primary records or a valid matched comparison.", "observations": [ "The proposed process is absent in the fixed jurisdiction or institution.", "The constituent issues do not overlap in population, institution, jurisdiction, or time.", "A matched comparison shows the same pattern without the proposed process.", "Primary records support an alternative explanation more directly than the proposed mechanism." ], "plan_id": "disconfirmation:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards", "precommitment": "Jurisdiction, institution, population, timeframe, outcome, and matching rules must be recorded before adjudication.", "status": "EVIDENCE_ACQUISITION_INCOMPLETE" }, "document_trail": [ { "acquisition_status": "NOT_LOCATED", "document_type": "law", "event_date": null, "evidence_category": "FORMAL_RULE", "limitation": "A dated source-linked entry may be added only after the record is acquired and its exact locator is governed.", "sequence_order": 1, "source_id": null, "source_locator": null }, { "acquisition_status": "NOT_LOCATED", "document_type": "regulation", "event_date": null, "evidence_category": "FORMAL_RULE", "limitation": "A dated source-linked entry may be added only after the record is acquired and its exact locator is governed.", "sequence_order": 2, "source_id": null, "source_locator": null }, { "acquisition_status": "NOT_LOCATED", "document_type": "guidance", "event_date": null, "evidence_category": "FORMAL_RULE", "limitation": "A dated source-linked entry may be added only after the record is acquired and its exact locator is governed.", "sequence_order": 3, "source_id": null, "source_locator": null }, { "acquisition_status": "NOT_LOCATED", "document_type": "decision", "event_date": null, "evidence_category": "IMPLEMENTATION_RECORD", "limitation": "A dated source-linked entry may be added only after the record is acquired and its exact locator is governed.", "sequence_order": 4, "source_id": null, "source_locator": null }, { "acquisition_status": "NOT_LOCATED", "document_type": "contract", "event_date": null, "evidence_category": "IMPLEMENTATION_RECORD", "limitation": "A dated source-linked entry may be added only after the record is acquired and its exact locator is governed.", "sequence_order": 5, "source_id": null, "source_locator": null }, { "acquisition_status": "NOT_LOCATED", "document_type": "audit", "event_date": null, "evidence_category": "OBSERVED_PROCESS", "limitation": "A dated source-linked entry may be added only after the record is acquired and its exact locator is governed.", "sequence_order": 6, "source_id": null, "source_locator": null }, { "acquisition_status": "NOT_LOCATED", "document_type": "dataset", "event_date": null, "evidence_category": "MEASURED_OUTCOME", "limitation": "A dated source-linked entry may be added only after the record is acquired and its exact locator is governed.", "sequence_order": 7, "source_id": null, "source_locator": null }, { "acquisition_status": "NOT_LOCATED", "document_type": "complaint", "event_date": null, "evidence_category": "REPORTED_EXPERIENCE", "limitation": "A dated source-linked entry may be added only after the record is acquired and its exact locator is governed.", "sequence_order": 8, "source_id": null, "source_locator": null }, { "acquisition_status": "NOT_LOCATED", "document_type": "appeal", "event_date": null, "evidence_category": "REMEDY_USE", "limitation": "A dated source-linked entry may be added only after the record is acquired and its exact locator is governed.", "sequence_order": 9, "source_id": null, "source_locator": null }, { "acquisition_status": "NOT_LOCATED", "document_type": "correction", "event_date": null, "evidence_category": "REMEDY_OUTCOME", "limitation": "A dated source-linked entry may be added only after the record is acquired and its exact locator is governed.", "sequence_order": 10, "source_id": null, "source_locator": null }, { "acquisition_status": "NOT_LOCATED", "document_type": "policy change", "event_date": null, "evidence_category": "FORMAL_RULE", "limitation": "A dated source-linked entry may be added only after the record is acquired and its exact locator is governed.", "sequence_order": 11, "source_id": null, "source_locator": null } ], "evaluation_status": "NOT_EXTERNALLY_EVALUATED", "evidence_categories": [ { "category": "FORMAL_RULE", "evidence_status": "NOT_ACQUIRED", "exact_locators": [], "separation_rule": "A formal entitlement or rule is not proof of implementation.", "source_ids": [] }, { "category": "IMPLEMENTATION_RECORD", "evidence_status": "NOT_ACQUIRED", "exact_locators": [], "separation_rule": "This category remains distinct and requires category-appropriate records and locators.", "source_ids": [] }, { "category": "OBSERVED_PROCESS", "evidence_status": "NOT_ACQUIRED", "exact_locators": [], "separation_rule": "This category remains distinct and requires category-appropriate records and locators.", "source_ids": [] }, { "category": "REPORTED_EXPERIENCE", "evidence_status": "NOT_ACQUIRED", "exact_locators": [], "separation_rule": "Reported experience is not a population-level measured outcome.", "source_ids": [] }, { "category": "MEASURED_OUTCOME", "evidence_status": "NOT_ACQUIRED", "exact_locators": [], "separation_rule": "A measured association is not a causal mechanism.", "source_ids": [] }, { "category": "LEGAL_CHARACTERIZATION", "evidence_status": "NOT_ACQUIRED", "exact_locators": [], "separation_rule": "This category remains distinct and requires category-appropriate records and locators.", "source_ids": [] }, { "category": "INSTITUTIONAL_ROLE", "evidence_status": "NOT_ACQUIRED", "exact_locators": [], "separation_rule": "This category remains distinct and requires category-appropriate records and locators.", "source_ids": [] }, { "category": "REMEDY_AVAILABILITY", "evidence_status": "NOT_ACQUIRED", "exact_locators": [], "separation_rule": "This category remains distinct and requires category-appropriate records and locators.", "source_ids": [] }, { "category": "REMEDY_USE", "evidence_status": "NOT_ACQUIRED", "exact_locators": [], "separation_rule": "This category remains distinct and requires category-appropriate records and locators.", "source_ids": [] }, { "category": "REMEDY_OUTCOME", "evidence_status": "NOT_ACQUIRED", "exact_locators": [], "separation_rule": "This category remains distinct and requires category-appropriate records and locators.", "source_ids": [] } ], "evidence_status": "EVIDENCE_ACQUISITION_INCOMPLETE", "exports": { "alternative_explanations_csv": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/alternative-explanations.csv", "change_log_json": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/change-log.json", "citation_pack_md": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/citation-pack.md", "claim_evidence_matrix_csv": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/claim-evidence-matrix.csv", "comparison_design_csv": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/comparison-design.csv", "data_table_specification_csv": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/data-table-specification.csv", "disconfirming_evidence_plan_csv": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/disconfirming-evidence-plan.csv", "external_review_worksheet_md": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/external-review-worksheet.md", "institutional_responsibility_map_csv": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/institutional-responsibility-map.csv", "method_and_limitations_md": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/method-and-limitations.md", "open_data_manifest_json": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/open-data-manifest.json", "prior_work_register_csv": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/prior-work-register.csv", "records_acquisition_checklist_csv": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/records-acquisition-checklist.csv", "reproduction_instructions_md": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/reproduction-instructions.md", "research_brief_md": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/research-brief.md", "research_object_json": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/research-object.json", "source_locator_register_csv": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/source-locator-register.csv", "stakeholder_role_matrix_csv": "/downloads/investigation-packages/v7.40/profiling-classification-safeguards/stakeholder-role-matrix.csv" }, "external_challenge": { "allowed_evaluator_dispositions": [ "TRACEABILITY_CONFIRMED", "TRACEABILITY_GAP_FOUND", "MATERIAL_SOURCE_GAP_FOUND", "COMPARISON_DESIGN_GAP_FOUND", "ALTERNATIVE_EXPLANATION_MISSING", "REPRODUCTION_PASS", "REPRODUCTION_FAIL", "LANGUAGE_OVERSTATES_EVIDENCE", "NO_MATERIAL_DEFECT_LOCATED" ], "evaluation_separate_from_evidence_status": true, "forbidden_automatic_outputs": [ "CLAIM_VERIFIED", "CLAIM_FALSE", "CAUSATION_CONFIRMED", "PUBLICATION_APPROVED" ], "surface": "/evaluate/#comparative-challenge", "tasks": [ { "required_output": "bounded_question_restatement", "task": "Restate the central question without strengthening its language.", "task_number": 1 }, { "required_output": "three_proposition_traces", "task": "Trace at least three propositions to exact records and locators.", "task_number": 2 }, { "required_output": "unsupported_assumption", "task": "Identify one unsupported assumption.", "task_number": 3 }, { "required_output": "contrary_evidence", "task": "Identify or propose contrary evidence.", "task_number": 4 }, { "required_output": "reproduction_record", "task": "Reproduce one calculation or comparison.", "task_number": 5 }, { "required_output": "causation_limit", "task": "Explain why the package does not yet establish causation.", "task_number": 6 }, { "required_output": "local_review_export", "task": "Export a citation-complete review worksheet.", "task_number": 7 } ], "transmission": "NONE_BROWSER_LOCAL_EXPORT_ONLY" }, "generated_at": "2026-08-30T00:00:00Z", "institutional_responsibility_map": [ { "documentation_state": "UNKNOWN", "exact_locators": [], "institution_name": null, "institutional_function": "data collection", "limitation": "This maps a function to be documented; it does not infer personal responsibility, blame, intent, or culpability.", "responsibility_id": "responsibility:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:data-collection", "responsible_role": "TO_BE_IDENTIFIED_FROM_PRIMARY_RECORD", "source_ids": [] }, { "documentation_state": "UNKNOWN", "exact_locators": [], "institution_name": null, "institutional_function": "rulemaking", "limitation": "This maps a function to be documented; it does not infer personal responsibility, blame, intent, or culpability.", "responsibility_id": "responsibility:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:rulemaking", "responsible_role": "TO_BE_IDENTIFIED_FROM_PRIMARY_RECORD", "source_ids": [] }, { "documentation_state": "UNKNOWN", "exact_locators": [], "institution_name": null, "institutional_function": "implementation", "limitation": "This maps a function to be documented; it does not infer personal responsibility, blame, intent, or culpability.", "responsibility_id": "responsibility:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:implementation", "responsible_role": "TO_BE_IDENTIFIED_FROM_PRIMARY_RECORD", "source_ids": [] }, { "documentation_state": "UNKNOWN", "exact_locators": [], "institution_name": null, "institutional_function": "decision", "limitation": "This maps a function to be documented; it does not infer personal responsibility, blame, intent, or culpability.", "responsibility_id": "responsibility:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:decision", "responsible_role": "TO_BE_IDENTIFIED_FROM_PRIMARY_RECORD", "source_ids": [] }, { "documentation_state": "UNKNOWN", "exact_locators": [], "institution_name": null, "institutional_function": "notice", "limitation": "This maps a function to be documented; it does not infer personal responsibility, blame, intent, or culpability.", "responsibility_id": "responsibility:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:notice", "responsible_role": "TO_BE_IDENTIFIED_FROM_PRIMARY_RECORD", "source_ids": [] }, { "documentation_state": "UNKNOWN", "exact_locators": [], "institution_name": null, "institutional_function": "review", "limitation": "This maps a function to be documented; it does not infer personal responsibility, blame, intent, or culpability.", "responsibility_id": "responsibility:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:review", "responsible_role": "TO_BE_IDENTIFIED_FROM_PRIMARY_RECORD", "source_ids": [] }, { "documentation_state": "UNKNOWN", "exact_locators": [], "institution_name": null, "institutional_function": "correction", "limitation": "This maps a function to be documented; it does not infer personal responsibility, blame, intent, or culpability.", "responsibility_id": "responsibility:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:correction", "responsible_role": "TO_BE_IDENTIFIED_FROM_PRIMARY_RECORD", "source_ids": [] }, { "documentation_state": "UNKNOWN", "exact_locators": [], "institution_name": null, "institutional_function": "appeal", "limitation": "This maps a function to be documented; it does not infer personal responsibility, blame, intent, or culpability.", "responsibility_id": "responsibility:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:appeal", "responsible_role": "TO_BE_IDENTIFIED_FROM_PRIMARY_RECORD", "source_ids": [] }, { "documentation_state": "UNKNOWN", "exact_locators": [], "institution_name": null, "institutional_function": "oversight", "limitation": "This maps a function to be documented; it does not infer personal responsibility, blame, intent, or culpability.", "responsibility_id": "responsibility:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:oversight", "responsible_role": "TO_BE_IDENTIFIED_FROM_PRIMARY_RECORD", "source_ids": [] }, { "documentation_state": "UNKNOWN", "exact_locators": [], "institution_name": null, "institutional_function": "funding", "limitation": "This maps a function to be documented; it does not infer personal responsibility, blame, intent, or culpability.", "responsibility_id": "responsibility:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:funding", "responsible_role": "TO_BE_IDENTIFIED_FROM_PRIMARY_RECORD", "source_ids": [] }, { "documentation_state": "UNKNOWN", "exact_locators": [], "institution_name": null, "institutional_function": "remedy", "limitation": "This maps a function to be documented; it does not infer personal responsibility, blame, intent, or culpability.", "responsibility_id": "responsibility:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:remedy", "responsible_role": "TO_BE_IDENTIFIED_FROM_PRIMARY_RECORD", "source_ids": [] } ], "method": { "limitations": [ "No primary source, observed process, reported experience, measured outcome, or remedy evidence is acquired by this build.", "Comparison designs are executable specifications, not comparative results.", "External evaluation identifies traceability, source, comparison, reproduction, and language defects; it does not adjudicate truth.", "Browser-local notes and Workspace state are excluded from committed exports." ], "method_id": "method:v740:comparative-investigation-package-assembly", "selection_rule": "First two v7.39 objects in deterministic slug order among objects with complete structural contracts; no composite score or rank." }, "negative_case_specification": { "design": { "alternative_explanations": [ "selection effects", "reporting differences", "resource variation", "administrative capacity", "measurement definition" ], "comparison_id": "comparison:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards:safeguard-presence", "comparison_type": "INSTITUTION_WITH_SAFEGUARD_COMPARABLE_INSTITUTION_WITHOUT_SAFEGUARD", "data_limitations": "No case, primary record, dataset, denominator, or measurement definition has yet been acquired; comparability remains untested.", "denominators": [ "all in-scope decisions or encounters in each case", "all people meeting the pre-registered eligibility rule" ], "disconfirming_pattern": "No pathway difference appears, or the apparent difference predates the safeguard or follows unrelated institutional change.", "exclusions": [ "records outside the pre-registered period", "unmatched aggregates", "records whose population or decision unit cannot be resolved" ], "expected_mechanism": "A functioning safeguard should alter notice, review, correction, or outcome pathways if the proposed mechanism is operative.", "inclusions": [ "records inside the fixed jurisdiction, institution, period, role, and policy state", "records with a stable join key or documented aggregate denominator" ], "institution": "One implementing institution with a documented safeguard and one comparable institution without it", "jurisdiction": "Matched jurisdictions or one shared jurisdiction", "policy_state": "Documented safeguard present versus safeguard absent", "population_or_stakeholder_role": "People subject to the same classification function", "status": "DESIGN_READY_EVIDENCE_NOT_ACQUIRED", "timeframe": "A review period fixed before acquisition, with aligned start and end dates for both cases", "unit_of_analysis": "one classification process during the fixed review period", "variables": [ "implementation_process_present", "eligible_population_denominator", "observable_consequence_count", "remedy_use_count" ] }, "evidence_status": "NOT_ACQUIRED", "interpretation_rule": "A negative case may weaken or redirect the mechanism; it does not independently prove falsity or causation.", "negative_case_id": "negative-case:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards", "selection_status": "NOT_SELECTED" }, "package_id": "investigation-package:v740:profiling-classification-safeguards", "package_status": "EXTERNALLY_REVIEWABLE_RESEARCH_PACKAGE", "prior_work_register": { "located_records": [], "searched_sources": [], "state": "SYSTEMATIC_COVERAGE_REVIEW_NOT_COMPLETED", "statement": "Systematic coverage review was not completed; no novelty, first-study, or absence-of-prior-work claim is made." }, "provenance": { "build_command": "python3 tools/build_v740_investigation_packages.py", "compiler": "/tools/build_v740_investigation_packages.py", "source_object_path": "/data/research-objects-v739/objects/profiling-classification-safeguards.v1.json", "test_command": "python3 tools/validate_v740_investigation_packages.py" }, "records_acquisition_checklist": [ { "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "record_locator": "", "scope": "Named jurisdiction, institution, population, and review period to be fixed before request or search.", "source_class": "law or regulation", "status": "NOT_LOCATED", "support_direction": "NOT_EVALUATED", "task_id": "acquisition:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:01" }, { "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "record_locator": "", "scope": "Named jurisdiction, institution, population, and review period to be fixed before request or search.", "source_class": "agency guidance", "status": "NOT_LOCATED", "support_direction": "NOT_EVALUATED", "task_id": "acquisition:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:02" }, { "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "record_locator": "", "scope": "Named jurisdiction, institution, population, and review period to be fixed before request or search.", "source_class": "administrative record", "status": "REQUEST_PLANNED", "support_direction": "NOT_EVALUATED", "task_id": "acquisition:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:03" }, { "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "record_locator": "", "scope": "Named jurisdiction, institution, population, and review period to be fixed before request or search.", "source_class": "audit", "status": "NOT_LOCATED", "support_direction": "NOT_EVALUATED", "task_id": "acquisition:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:04" }, { "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "record_locator": "", "scope": "Named jurisdiction, institution, population, and review period to be fixed before request or search.", "source_class": "dataset", "status": "NOT_LOCATED", "support_direction": "NOT_EVALUATED", "task_id": "acquisition:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:05" }, { "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "record_locator": "", "scope": "Named jurisdiction, institution, population, and review period to be fixed before request or search.", "source_class": "complaint or appeal", "status": "REQUEST_PLANNED", "support_direction": "NOT_EVALUATED", "task_id": "acquisition:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:06" }, { "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "record_locator": "", "scope": "Named jurisdiction, institution, population, and review period to be fixed before request or search.", "source_class": "official correspondence", "status": "REQUEST_PLANNED", "support_direction": "NOT_EVALUATED", "task_id": "acquisition:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:07" }, { "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "record_locator": "", "scope": "Named jurisdiction, institution, population, and review period to be fixed before request or search.", "source_class": "public-record request", "status": "REQUEST_PLANNED", "support_direction": "NOT_EVALUATED", "task_id": "acquisition:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:08" } ], "release": "7.40", "schema_version": "wsmusings.comparative-investigation-package.v1", "slug": "profiling-classification-safeguards", "source_locator_register": [ { "acquisition_status": "NOT_LOCATED", "evidence_category": "TO_BE_CLASSIFIED_AFTER_ACQUISITION", "exact_locator": null, "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "source_class": "law or regulation", "source_id": null, "task_id": "acquisition:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:01" }, { "acquisition_status": "NOT_LOCATED", "evidence_category": "TO_BE_CLASSIFIED_AFTER_ACQUISITION", "exact_locator": null, "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "source_class": "agency guidance", "source_id": null, "task_id": "acquisition:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:02" }, { "acquisition_status": "REQUEST_PLANNED", "evidence_category": "TO_BE_CLASSIFIED_AFTER_ACQUISITION", "exact_locator": null, "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "source_class": "administrative record", "source_id": null, "task_id": "acquisition:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:03" }, { "acquisition_status": "NOT_LOCATED", "evidence_category": "TO_BE_CLASSIFIED_AFTER_ACQUISITION", "exact_locator": null, "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "source_class": "audit", "source_id": null, "task_id": "acquisition:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:04" }, { "acquisition_status": "NOT_LOCATED", "evidence_category": "TO_BE_CLASSIFIED_AFTER_ACQUISITION", "exact_locator": null, "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "source_class": "dataset", "source_id": null, "task_id": "acquisition:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:05" }, { "acquisition_status": "REQUEST_PLANNED", "evidence_category": "TO_BE_CLASSIFIED_AFTER_ACQUISITION", "exact_locator": null, "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "source_class": "complaint or appeal", "source_id": null, "task_id": "acquisition:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:06" }, { "acquisition_status": "REQUEST_PLANNED", "evidence_category": "TO_BE_CLASSIFIED_AFTER_ACQUISITION", "exact_locator": null, "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "source_class": "official correspondence", "source_id": null, "task_id": "acquisition:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:07" }, { "acquisition_status": "REQUEST_PLANNED", "evidence_category": "TO_BE_CLASSIFIED_AFTER_ACQUISITION", "exact_locator": null, "limitation": "Listing this class does not establish that a record exists, is accessible, or supports the hypothesis.", "source_class": "public-record request", "source_id": null, "task_id": "acquisition:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:08" } ], "source_research_object_id": "research-object:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards", "source_research_object_route": "/research/objects/profiling-classification-safeguards/", "source_research_object_sha256": "8b47ca760d4e391af1cbcfd0031d323bba888c3dc3f1fa0a7b69e4a6f18edb2d", "stakeholder_role_matrix": [ { "evidence_ids": [], "limitation": "No named entity, affiliation, representation, position, or impact is inferred.", "named_entity": null, "relationship_state": "PROPOSED", "role_class": "AFFECTED", "role_description": "People subject to or dependent on the process", "role_id": "role:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:affected" }, { "evidence_ids": [], "limitation": "No named entity, affiliation, representation, position, or impact is inferred.", "named_entity": null, "relationship_state": "PROPOSED", "role_class": "IMPLEMENTING", "role_description": "Institutional role responsible for applying the relevant process", "role_id": "role:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:implementing" }, { "evidence_ids": [], "limitation": "No named entity, affiliation, representation, position, or impact is inferred.", "named_entity": null, "relationship_state": "UNKNOWN", "role_class": "REGULATING", "role_description": "Role responsible for governing or constraining implementation", "role_id": "role:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:regulating" }, { "evidence_ids": [], "limitation": "No named entity, affiliation, representation, position, or impact is inferred.", "named_entity": null, "relationship_state": "UNKNOWN", "role_class": "REVIEWING", "role_description": "Role that reviews decisions, records, or outcomes", "role_id": "role:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:reviewing" }, { "evidence_ids": [], "limitation": "No named entity, affiliation, representation, position, or impact is inferred.", "named_entity": null, "relationship_state": "UNKNOWN", "role_class": "FUNDING", "role_description": "Role that authorizes or supplies material resources", "role_id": "role:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:funding" }, { "evidence_ids": [], "limitation": "No named entity, affiliation, representation, position, or impact is inferred.", "named_entity": null, "relationship_state": "UNKNOWN", "role_class": "OVERSIGHT", "role_description": "Role responsible for audit, monitoring, or public accountability", "role_id": "role:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:oversight" }, { "evidence_ids": [], "limitation": "No named entity, affiliation, representation, position, or impact is inferred.", "named_entity": null, "relationship_state": "UNKNOWN", "role_class": "REMEDY", "role_description": "Role able to correct, reverse, appeal, or remedy an adverse consequence", "role_id": "role:v739:profiling-classification-safeguards:remedy" } ], "title": "Profiling Classification & Public Safeguards" }